[A. Call to Order and Announce that a Quorum is Present.]
[00:00:04]
IT IS 630 AND I CALL TO ORDER THE TUESDAY, MARCH 4TH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND TRANSPORTATION BOARD. FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS TO ANNOUNCE THAT A QUORUM IS PRESENT.
[B. Approval of Minutes]
THE NEXT ORDER OF BUSINESS IS APPROVING THE MINUTES.ANYONE HAVE ADDITIONS? CORRECTIONS? IF NOT, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE. MOTION BY FRANCESCA. SECOND BY JACK.
ALL IN FAVOR MAY VOTE. NOW. MOTION CARRIES SIX ZERO.
[C. Regular Hearings]
THE NEXT ARE A SERIES OF REGULAR HEARINGS. THE FIRST IS THE FINAL PLAT OF WILLOWS AT OAK BEND, CONTAINING 41 TOWNHOMES. LOT 21 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED LOTS IN FOUR GREEN SPACE.LOTS ON 7.935 ACRES OUT OF THE L BOURGEOIS SURVEY.
ABSTRACT NUMBER 52. ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ESTATE, TOWNHOUSE PD ETH DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 301 AND 333 EAST HOOKER LANE AT 20 308-1FF PCP.
STAFF. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THIS PLAT SEVERAL TIMES AND DUE TO ERROR, IT WAS NEVER BROUGHT FORWARD TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. QUESTIONS. COMMENTS.
IF NOT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT.
SECOND MOTION TO APPROVE. BY RICK. SECONDED BY FRANCESCA.
YOU MAY VOTE NOW. MOTION CARRIES SIX ZERO. ITEM NUMBER THREE.
FINAL PLAT OF KINGSWOOD HILLS EDITION CONTAINS 136 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED LOTS AND SEVEN GREEN SPACE LOTS ON 47.641 ACRES OUT OF THE R.F. HARDIN SURVEY.
ABSTRACT NUMBER 613. THE DE COOK SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 234 AND THE TO WEST SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 1345. AND THE B SCHOONOVER SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER ONE 209.
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF JOSIE LANE, APPROXIMATELY 3000FT FEET SOUTH OF WINTER HAVEN PARKWAY.
2405 TWO DASH FPC. COMMISSIONERS. STAFF HAS ALSO REVIEWED THIS PLOT.
IT WAS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED ON MAY 28TH OF LAST YEAR.
HAS GONE THROUGH SEVERAL ROUNDS OF REVIEW AND IS NOW READY FOR APPROVAL.
THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? IF NOT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MOVE TO APPROVE.
MOVE TO APPROVE. BY ARAM, SECONDED BY AINSLIE.
YOU MAY VOTE NOW. MOTION CARRIES 670. WELCOME, JOSH.
ITEM NUMBER FOUR. FINAL PLAT OF AMERICAN LANDSCAPE EDITION ON 1.129 ACRES OUT OF THE SOUTH.
EXCUSE ME. S M HAYDEN SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER 537.
ZONE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT 504 BARNETT LANE 2502 FOUR FP. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS. THIS PLAT WAS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED ON FEBRUARY 3RD AND HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY STAFF.
THE DEFICIENCIES ARE LISTED WITHIN THE STAFF MEMO, AND STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DISAPPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF THE AMERICAN LANDSCAPE ADDITION FOR THE DEFICIENCIES LISTED, AND DELEGATE TO STAFF THE AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT AND APPROVE THE PLAT.
THANK YOU. STAFF. COMMISSIONERS. QUESTIONS. COMMENTS? IF THERE ARE NONE, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. A MOTION TO DISAPPROVE THE FINAL PLAT DUE TO DEFICIENCIES,
[00:05:07]
AND DELEGATE TO STAFF THE AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT AND APPROVE WHEN THE DEFICIENCIES ARE CORRECTED.MOTION BY RICK, SECONDED BY AINSLEY. YOU MAY VOTE NOW.
MOTION CARRIES SEVEN ZERO. ITEM NUMBER FIVE. CONSIDERATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE STANDARD RELATED TO ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS OF THE I-35E QUARTER.
OVERLAY DISTRICT ON 1.056 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE J.
SUTTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 1155 AND THE PICKETT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 1014, LOCATED ON THE NORTH CORNER OF I-35 EAST FRONTAGE ROAD AND FOX AVENUE INTERSECTION, AS REQUESTED BY EMILY ZOELLNER, P.E. OF MANATT CONSULTING ON BEHALF OF THE RUNTIME CENTER'S LLC, THE PROPERTY OWNERS.
AFTER THAT MEETING, THE ELEVATIONS HAD BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY ALTERED FROM WHAT I PRESENTED TO YOU, AND I WANTED TO BRING BACK FOR THE ELEVATIONS WHAT THE ALTERNATIVE STANDARD YOU YOU RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AT THAT MEETING.
THIS ALTERNATIVE STANDARD, IT IS STILL LACKING IN A SIMILAR METHOD TO THE PREVIOUS ALTERNATIVE STANDARD, AND THEY ARE REQUESTING TO REDUCE THE GLASS BUILDING MATERIAL REQUIREMENT FROM 40% TO 0% PERCENT 100% REDUCTION ALONG THE I-35 FRONTAGE ROAD. I HAVE RENDERINGS OF THE ELEVATIONS UP ON THE SCREEN AND I HAVE A QUICK COMPARISON.
THIS IS THE PREVIOUS ELEVATION THAT WAS APPROVED AT THE LAST MEETING AND THIS IS THE NEW ELEVATIONS.
THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS QUESTIONS FOR JONATHAN.
I THINK I HAVE A I HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT.
SURE. HOW ARE YOU DOING, COMMISSIONER? HI. MY NAME IS WARREN.
I'M WITH FRONTLINE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT. I'M SPEAKING FOR BOTH THE OWNERS HERE.
WE HAVE PATRICK AND RICHARD. AND YOUR QUESTION? WHAT? WHAT BROUGHT YOU TO THIS NEW REQUEST? THE ORIGINAL DESIGN PRESENTED.
IT WASN'T INTERESTING ENOUGH FOR OUR VERY FINE GENTLEMEN BEHIND ME.
SO WE WENT BACK THROUGH A REDESIGN PROCESS, TRYING TO MAKE THAT CONCEPT VERY UNIQUE TO THE BRAND.
YOU KNOW, IF YOU GO TO A WHATABURGER AND YOU SEE THE THE A-FRAME, YOU DON'T EVEN GOT TO KNOW IT'S A WHATABURGER, RIGHT? YOU JUST SEE A FRAME. ORANGE, WHITE. LET'S REDESIGN.
OKAY. BASED OFF THE COMMENTS OF THE LAST PLANNING ZONE MEETING, WHICH, BY THE WAY, SORRY I WASN'T HERE, BUT I WAS WATCHING VIRTUALLY. I KNOW THERE WAS SOME CONCERNS REGARDING, LIKE, THE GLASS.
SO THE GLASS WAS REMOVED, THE WINDOWS REINSERTED.
OKAY. I JUST WANTED TO QUICKLY CLARIFY THAT THE THE ALTERNATIVE STANDARD IS THE SAME ALTERNATIVE STANDARD THAT WAS REQUESTED AND THE ELEVATIONS MEET THE I-35 OVERLAY IN THE SAME CAPACITY THE ORIGINAL ELEVATION DID.
WE JUST FELT THAT THIS ELEVATION, EVEN THOUGH WE'RE ASKING FOR THE EXACT SAME ALTERNATIVE STANDARD, THAT IT WAS SUCH A DEPARTURE FROM WHAT I ORIGINALLY PRESENTED AT THE LAST MEETING, I WANTED TO BRING THE NEW ELEVATION FORWARD, BUT THERE'S NO NEW ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS BEING ASKED.
THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION.
YES, MA'AM. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? IF NOT, I'LL READ THESE NAMES INTO THE RECORD.
THERE'S BECCA, DEACON WARREN. WHERE RICHARD VILLAIN.
VILLAIN PRONOUNCED FOR ME, PLEASE. SO I'M CORRECT.
THANK YOU. AND PATRICK LOCK. THANK YOU, AGAIN.
THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN, FOR THERE ARE NO MORE QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONERS.
[00:10:02]
AND I STILL FEEL THE SAME WAY THAT I DID THE LAST TIME THAT I VOTED AGAINST THIS.IN REGARDS OF THE SAFETY. WHEN YOU'RE TURNING INTO THAT STREET RIGHT NOW, INTO YOUR PROPERTY, I'M JUST AFRAID THAT THAT MIGHT BE A SAFETY ISSUE.
AND, I MEAN, BUT THE CITY IS SAYING THAT IT'S FINE.
BUT I STILL AM A LITTLE BIT SKEPTICAL AS TO IT GOING IN THAT AREA.
I THINK THEY'RE ALL FOR. BECAUSE RIGHT, AS SOON AS THE BRIDGE AS YOU'RE DRIVING THROUGH, I MEAN, THERE'S LIKE A BLOCK, LIKE YOU CANNOT SEE IF SOMEBODY'S STOPPING BECAUSE THEY NOW REALIZE, OH, HERE'S WHERE I NEED TO COME AND PICK UP MY FOOD.
I CAN SEE THAT THERE'S A SAFETY. THERE COULD BE A SAFETY CONCERN, AT LEAST FOR ME.
IT WOULD BE CLOSE TO A SCHOOL BEING CLOSE TO.
BUT AS A PERSON THAT DRIVES THAT STREET AND THAT FRONTAGE, BECAUSE I GO THROUGH THERE TO GO TO SEVERAL OF THE PLACES THAT I FREQUENT, LIKE THAT STARBUCKS AND JUST THAT GETTING INTO MAIN STREET RIGHT NOW AND BRAHMS. AND SO I STILL SEE A SOME KIND OF HAZARD.
AND I WOULD HATE FOR NOT TO EXPRESS MY OPINION ON IT.
IT'S SOMETHING LATER ON DOWN THE ROAD COMES OUT.
YEAH. I MEAN, COMMISSIONER, THANK YOU FOR THAT.
WELCOME. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER, THANK YOU FOR THE FOR RAISING THAT.
SO ANY IDEA THAT THAT, YOU KNOW, YOU MIGHT HAVE, AND ESPECIALLY WE'RE HAPPY TO WORK WITH THE CITY TO FIGURE OUT LIKE, HEY, WHAT ELSE CAN WE WHAT ELSE CAN WE DO TO TO KIND OF REDUCE THE RISK OF ANYTHING? AND I THINK YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT BASICALLY JUST CAR DRIVING AND NOT SEEING ANYTHING.
RIGHT. SO SO YEAH. SO WE YOU KNOW, WE BASICALLY HAVE IDEAS IN TERMS OF MAKE SIGNS VISIBLE TO SAY LIKE, HEY, YOU KNOW, THERE MIGHT THERE'S A, THERE'S CAR COMING IN AND THERE'S CAR COMING OUT.
SO IT'S JUST A FUNCTION OF US COMMUNICATING. AND THAT'S PART OF WHAT, YOU KNOW, PART OF THE OVERALL DESIGN IS, IS TO MAKE SURE THAT, YOU KNOW, SAFETY IN TERMS OF CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE AND SAFETY IS PART OF THAT.
RIGHT. IS PART OF THE IS PART OF THE PACKAGE? OKAY. DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? IT DOES. IT DOES. AND I MEAN BUT I STILL HAD TO SAY SOMETHING.
YEAH. JUST BECAUSE MOST RECENTLY I PASSED BY THERE AND I WAS THINKING, OH, YES, THERE IT IS.
THERE'S THE ENTRANCE. AND I THOUGHT I COULD, I MYSELF COULD EASILY MIS MISS IT.
AND I'M THINKING, I DON'T KNOW THAT THAT WOULD BE.
YEAH, WELL, YEAH, WE'LL DEFINITELY TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION FOR SURE.
YEAH, YEAH. AND I THINK ONE OF THE COMMISSIONERS LAST TIME MENTIONED SOMETHING ABOUT LIGHTING AND THE LIGHTING GOING INTO THE NEIGHBORS, AND I KNOW THAT THAT'S PROBABLY NOT HERE NOR THERE, BUT THAT'S ALSO A, YOU KNOW, THE OUR, THE NEIGHBORS. I MEAN, I'M ASSUMING THE CITY'S DONE THEIR DUE DILIGENCE AND MAKING SURE THAT EVERYTHING IS RIGHT DURING THE ENGINEERING SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS. WE DO REQUIRE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS, AND WE MAKE SURE IT MEETS ALL THE STANDARDS OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH DOES HAVE SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR THE AMOUNT OF CANDLES OF LIGHT THAT CAN GO INTO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WELL, YOU ALL HAVE MY SUPPORT, THEN.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU. OKAY, COMMISSIONERS.
I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ALTERNATIVE STANDARD AS PRESENTED.
SECOND MOTION BY JOSHUA. SECOND BY AARON. YOU MAY VOTE NOW.
MOTION CARRIES SEVEN ZERO. COMMISSIONERS, THIS ITEM WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR A FINAL DECISION ON MONDAY, MARCH 17TH, 2025 AT 7:00 PM. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
RICHARD. ITEM NUMBER SIX CONSIDERATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE STANDARD ASSOCIATED WITH LANDSCAPING STANDARDS ON 0.935 ACRES LOCATED AT 591 BENJAMIN'S WAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED, DESCRIBED AS LOTS FOUR, SIX AND EIGHT PANEL SUBDIVISION PHASE FOUR ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LI, AS REQUESTED BY STEVEN MEYER OF MEYER ENGINEERING INCORPORATED ON
[00:15:09]
BEHALF OF THE OWNER, ZINDEL HOLDINGS HOLDINGS.EXCUSE ME LLC, 2501 TWO ALTE STAND. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.
AN ALTERNATIVE STANDARD IS BEING REQUESTED FOR A SERVICE CONTRACTOR USE OFF OF BENJAMIN'S WAY.
THE SITE WAS ORIGINALLY CONSTRUCTED IN 97. BUT IT WAS PURCHASED AROUND 2018, I BELIEVE BY AN OWNER. AND THEY MADE SOME SITE IMPROVEMENTS, BUT DID NOT RECEIVE THE CORRECT PERMITS FOR THAT.
THE SITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE ON THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE SITE.
THIS ADDED DRIVE RIGHT HERE. THE ORIGINAL LOTS.
WERE THESE TWO RIGHT HERE? AND SO THEY RECEIVED NOTIFICATION ABOUT CODE COMPLIANCE, AND THEY ARE CURRENTLY MAKING IMPROVEMENTS TO THEIR SITE TO BRING IT UP TO CODE AS WELL AS ADD FIVE ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES ON THIS EASTERN PORTION AND A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. THEY ARE REQUESTING AN ALTERNATIVE STANDARD BECAUSE THE CODE REQUIRES A 30 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER, BUT THE SITE, AS MENTIONED, IS PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED AND THEY HAVE WHAT I BELIEVE IS ABOUT A TEN FOOT BUFFER.
HERE THERE'S SOME PREEXISTING TREES HERE, BUT THERE THEY WOULD BE UNABLE TO MAKE IT THAT 30 FOOT BASED OFF OF REQUIRED SPACING FOR MANEUVERING AND PARKING.
SO THEY'RE REQUESTING A REDUCTION TO LEAVE IT AT THE CURRENT 10%.
AND TO ACCOUNT FOR THIS REDUCTION, THEY'RE ADDING TWO ADDITIONAL TREES ON THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE SITE HIGHLIGHTED IN GREEN HERE. FOR THE ALTERNATIVE STANDARD. I'M HERE FOR QUESTIONS, AND I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.
COMMISSIONERS. THE APPLICANT IS HERE. MR. HOLMES IS HERE IF WE HAVE ANYTHING. YES. I JUST WANT TO SAY I ALWAYS APPRECIATE THE ADDITION OF TREES, SO I CAN'T GO WRONG THERE. ANY OTHER. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? COMMISSIONERS? IF NOT, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS AS PRESENTED.
SECOND MOTION BY SECOND BY AINSLEY. YOU MAY VOTE NOW.
MOTION CARRIES SEVEN ZERO. COMMISSIONERS. THIS ITEM WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION ON MONDAY, MARCH 17TH, 2025 AT 7:00 PM. THANK YOU.
AND THE NEXT ITEM WE HAVE IS A PUBLIC HEARING.
[D. Public Hearing ]
IT'S A CONSIDERATION OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM PUBLIC USE PER DISTRICT TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT.TOWNHOUSE TWO PD TWO DISTRICT ON 3.211 ACRES.
AS REQUESTED BY BENNY JAFARI, TSM, JV, LLC, THE PROPERTY OWNER.
CASE NUMBER 20 308-6- PS. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.
SO THIS PROPERTY WAS ORIGINALLY OWNED BY LEWISVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
THEY DID AUCTION OFF THE PROPERTY. AND IT WAS PURCHASED BY TSM.
JV. WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING IS A TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT THAT WOULD OFFER OPPORTUNITIES FOR OWNERSHIP.
THAT'S BASED OFF OF BELLVILLE VILLAGE IN OLD TOWN, WHICH IS ANOTHER PROJECT THAT THEY COMPLETED.
THE ARCHITECTURE IS SIMILAR, ALTHOUGH NOT IDENTICAL, TO BELLEVILLE VILLAGE.
THEY'VE CHANGED THE ROOFLINE A LITTLE BIT, AND SOME OF THE WINDOWS WITHOUT THE CURVED TOPS.
[00:20:03]
TO ACHIEVE THE DENSITY THERE ARE LOTS PROPOSED ARE SMALLER THAN THE BASE TWO ZONING STAFF DID ACTUALLY LOOK AT DOING AN OLD TOWN MIXED USE BASED ZONING, BECAUSE A LOT OF THE SETBACKS IN THAT ARE DIFFERENT.BUT WE WANTED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THIS IS NOT ACTUALLY WITHIN THE OLD TOWN DESIGN DISTRICT, EVEN THOUGH IT'S JUST A FEW BLOCKS SOUTH OF PURNELL STREET.
PURNELL STREET IS THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE OLD TOWN DESIGN DISTRICT.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THAT STREET HERE ON THE MAP IN FRONT OF YOU.
SO THERE IS A TABLE THAT DOES OUTLINE A LOT OF THE SETBACK REDUCTIONS AGAIN IN THE OLD TOWN, MIXED USE TOO. THERE ARE MUCH LESSER RESTRICTIONS.
IT'S A FIVE FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. THERE'S BASICALLY A ZERO FOOT FRONT SETBACK.
IT'S A FOUR FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK ALONG AN ALLEY.
SO BUT WE DID USE THE TOWNHOUSE TWO AS THERE'S TOWNHOUSE TWO ZONING ACROSS THE STREET.
AND THIS IS NOT WITHIN OLD TOWN. SO THIS IS THE SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
IT WAS USED AS KIND OF A MAINTENANCE REPAIR AREA FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT.
YOU CAN SEE HERE THIS IS THE PROPOSED LAYOUT.
AND THEN ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS WITH THIS DENSITY IS TYPICALLY OUTSIDE OF OLD TOWN.
WE REQUIRE THREE OFF STREET PARKING SPACES PER UNIT.
THEY'RE JUST DOING TWO. THEY HAVE A TWO CAR GARAGE PER UNIT.
THEY ARE REAR ENTRY. SO EVERYTHING IS ALLEY ENTRY.
SO YOU WON'T HAVE ANY GARAGE DOORS FACING THE STREET.
BUT IT IS JUST A TWO CAR GARAGE. AND THEN THERE WILL BE ON STREET PARKING, BOTH ON THE EXISTING STREETS AND ON THE NEW STREETS THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT. IF THEY WERE WITHIN THE OLD TOWN DESIGN DISTRICT, THE TWO CAR GARAGE WOULD BE SUFFICIENT TO MEET OUR ORDINANCES.
IT'S ONLY BECAUSE THEY'RE OUTSIDE OF THAT THAT THAT THIRD SPACE IS REQUIRED.
THERE ARE ABOUT A TEN MINUTE WALK FROM MAIN STREET AND JUST ABOUT TWO BLOCKS SOUTH OF THE DESIGN DISTRICT, WHICH IS PART OF THE REASON FOR THAT. AND SIMILARLY, THEY'RE ALSO ASKING FOR SOME RELIEF ON THE SCREENING STANDARDS.
THE SCREENING STANDARDS ARE REALLY DESIGNED TO PROTECT SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS. THEY'RE THE ONES COMING IN ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING OFFICE TO THE NORTH AND SCHOOL TO THE WEST. THEY'RE PROPOSING JUST A WOODEN FENCE ON THE BACK SIDE OF THE ALLEY FOR SCREENING.
STAFF HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THAT. AND AGAIN, IN OLD TOWN, SCREENING STANDARDS WOULD BE LESS ANYWAY.
THE SURROUNDING USES ARE CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO THE WEST. THERE'S AN OFFICE TO THE NORTH.
ACROSS CHARLES STREET TO THE EAST IS SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD.
I'M SORRY. TO THE SOUTH IS THE SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD ZONED R 75 TO THE EAST.
ONE. THIS STAFF DOES FIND THAT THIS PROPOSAL IS SUPPORTING THE LEWISVILLE 2025 VISION PLAN, WHICH CALLS FOR THIS AREA TO BE A DIVERSE AND THRIVING NEIGHBORHOOD.
SO ADDING TOWNHOMES DOES INCREASE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR HOMEOWNERSHIP.
AND IT ALSO PROVIDES WALKABILITY TO OLD TOWN, WHICH WOULD ALSO SUPPORT OUR BIG MOVE OF OLD TOWN.
SO THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE. BUT IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS NOW OR WE CAN DO THEM AFTER THE PUBLIC HEARING. I HAVE ONE AT THE AT THE MOMENT SINCE THIS WAS A MAINTENANCE FACILITY. WAS THERE ANY REMEDIATION THAT NEEDED TO BE DONE? NOT THAT I'M AWARE OF, BUT WE CAN CERTAINLY ASK THE APPLICANT IF THAT WAS NECESSARY.
OKAY. THANK YOU. SO I ALSO HAD A QUESTION. SO 55 MINUTES IS I THINK READING THROUGH THIS.
THERE'S PARKING YOU KNOW LIKE COME IN THROUGH THE ALLEY.
I'M ASSUMING THERE'S NO PLACE TO PARK OTHER THAN IN YOUR GARAGE.
THERE'S NO DRIVEWAY OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. SO ANY ADDITIONAL.
AS WE ALL KNOW, PEOPLE DON'T ALWAYS PARK IN THEIR GARAGES BECAUSE THEY FILL IT UP WITH STUFF.
I MEAN, SO WHERE EVERYONE ELSE IS GOING TO HAVE TO PARK ON THE STREET. ANYBODY THAT COMES TO SEE THEM IS GOING TO PARK ON THE STREET. IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THE POTENTIAL TO HAVE A LOT OF CARS AROUND THIS AREA AND PARKING ON THE STREET.
IS ANYONE SAID ANYTHING ABOUT THAT, OR HAS THAT COME UP AS AN ISSUE FROM ANYBODY? OR. I DON'T NECESSARILY SEE THAT AS AN ISSUE BECAUSE THE STREETS ARE DESIGNED TO ALLOW FOR PARKING ON EITHER SIDE OF THE STREET, AND WITH THIS STREETSCAPE, WITH THE 53 FOOT SECTION THAT WAS DESIGNED FOR DENSER DEVELOPMENT.
SO WE STILL DO HAVE STREET TREES. SO ESSENTIALLY YOU'LL HAVE YOUR HOME, A LITTLE BIT OF A LANDSCAPE BUFFER THAT CAN ACCOMMODATE SOME SHRUBS OR GROUNDCOVER, THINGS LIKE THAT. YOU'LL HAVE YOUR SIDEWALK, THEN YOU'LL HAVE A SIX FOOT WIDE PLANTING STRIP WHERE THE TREES WILL GO.
SO THE TREES ARE ALWAYS AT LEAST TEN FEET AWAY FROM THE BUILDING FOUNDATION.
[00:25:02]
SO IF EVERYONE HAS A CAR, THERE'S 55 CARS. MOST PEOPLE HAVE TWO CARS.THERE'S 100 CARS, AND I JUST. IS THERE ANY CHANCE THAT THIS IS GOING TO BLEED INTO NEIGHBORHOODS? PEOPLE ARE GOING TO START PARKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS, AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO START HAVING ISSUES WITH, YOU KNOW, THE PEOPLE IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS COMPLAINING BECAUSE THESE PEOPLE ARE NOW PARKING ON THEIR STREETS, IN FRONT OF THEIR HOUSES AND ALL THAT KIND OF STUFF. I DON'T I'M JUST SEEMS LIKE A LOT OF CARS TO ADD TO THAT AREA THERE.
AND THEN THERE IS ON STREET PARKING WITH THE NEW STREETS A AND B THAT ARE PROPOSED WITH THE SUBDIVISION, AND SO TYPICALLY 22 TO 24 SPACES FOR AN ON STREET PARKING.
PEOPLE CAN ALSO PARK ON CHARLES STREET AND POTENTIALLY LAKE HAVEN, BUT RIGHT NOW, NOT IN ITS CURRENT CONFIGURATION, BUT RIGHT NOW IT'S CHARLES STREET WOULD ALSO BE A PLACE FOR PEOPLE TO PARK. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.
I, I, I SHARE RICK'S CONCERN BECAUSE I HAVE NO DRIVEWAYS RIGHT NOW BECAUSE MILL STREET IS BEING REDONE, AND WE ESSENTIALLY HAVE TWO PARKING SPACES IN FRONT OF OUR HOUSE.
AND WE HAVE WE CAN'T SEE THERE'S ONE LANE IN AND ONE LANE OUT.
AND IF YOU HAVE CARS PARKING ON TWO SIDES, THAT JUST THAT FEELS LIKE WE'RE SETTING SOMEBODY UP TO FAIL BECAUSE WE'RE NOT GOING TO SEE COMING AROUND A CORNER. WHAT IF EMERGENCY SERVICES NEEDS TO COME IN AND IT JUST DOESN'T.
IT JUST DOESN'T SEEM FEASIBLE IF THERE ARE LIKE MORE THAN TWO PEOPLE THAT DRIVE IN A HOUSEHOLD AND THERE JUST HAPPENS TO BE MORE CARS. I WILL SAY THE LAYOUT IS VERY SIMILAR TO BELVILLE VILLAGE, WHICH ALSO DOES NOT HAVE A THIRD SPACE.
SO THAT IS WITHIN OLD TOWN, THE DIMENSIONS AND THE PRODUCT IS VERY SIMILAR TO THAT.
SO IT'S ALL ALLEY ACCESS. THERE'S NOT ENOUGH ROOM TO PARK BEHIND YOUR GARAGE IN THE ALLEY.
THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT DO PARK ON THE STREET IN BELLVILLE VILLAGE.
I THINK ONE OF THE MORE IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS, TOO, IS THE INTERSECTIONS.
THEY ARE MEETING ALL OF OUR REQUIREMENTS FOR CORNER CLIPS.
ECLIPSE. THAT'S THE ANGLE YOU'LL SEE THAT THE ANGLES AT EACH OF THE CORNERS.
YES. OKAY. YEAH. AND AGAIN, IT'S VERY TYPICAL OF THIS TYPE OF DENSITY.
LIKE I SAID, WE WE HAVE BELVILLE VILLAGE IS ONE EXAMPLE, BUT EVEN SOUTH VILLAGE IS ANOTHER.
EVEN TIGHTER. I THINK THEY'RE RIGHT AWAY WITH US ARE A LITTLE SMALLER.
AND AGAIN, IT'S MORE OF AN URBAN, MORE WALKABLE.
WE DON'T WANT REALLY HIGH SPEEDS. WE WANT THE CARS TO GO SLOW.
AND USUALLY PARKED CARS ON THE STREET DOES TEND TO MAKE TRAFFIC SLOW DOWN.
AND THIS IS RIGHT ON THE EDGE OF OLD TOWN. SO THAT'S KIND OF ONE OF THE REASONS WHY A DEVELOPMENT OF THIS DENSITY KIND OF AIDS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF OLD TOWN AND TO THE CHARACTER AND THE FEEL AND THE DENSITY.
THANK YOU. RICHARD. THANK STAFF FOR BRINGING UP THE OLD TOWN EXPERIENCE.
WE'VE DONE WALKING TOURS. GOT TO SEE SOME OF THE RESULTS OF NOT HAVING THOSE DIAGONAL CUTS OF THE THE GEOMETRIES AT THE END. IF Y'ALL FEEL LIKE YOU'VE APPLIED THOSE LESSONS TO THIS DESIGN.
CORRECT. THEY HAVE PROVIDED DIFFERENT CORNER CLIPS.
WE ARE DOING A FULL WIDTH STREET RIGHT AWAY. WE HAVE NOT REDUCED THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY AT ALL, WHICH IS, I THINK, WHERE A LOT OF SOME OF THE ISSUES CAME FROM IN OTHER PROJECTS.
SO I THINK THAT THAT REALLY DOES HELP WITH THIS PROJECT.
AND SO FAR AS WE KNOW, THE, THE, THE NEEDS OF SANITATION FOR THOSE TYPE OF VEHICLES REMAIN THE SAME FROM THOSE PREVIOUS LESSONS. YEAH, WE HAVE ACTUALLY WE'VE WITH THE ALLEYS, THE ALLEYS ARE ACTUALLY BEING PAVED A LITTLE BIT WIDER.
THE REASON THAT WE PAVED IT WIDER WAS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DIDN'T HAVE HALF A DRIVEWAY BEHIND A HOME THAT ENCOURAGED PEOPLE TO WANT TO TRY TO PARK THERE AND THEN HANG OUT AND BLOCK THE ALLEY. WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE WERE IT WAS VERY CLEAR THAT THAT IS NOT A PARKING SPACE.
THANK YOU. IF THERE ARE NO MORE QUESTIONS. YES.
GO AHEAD. CAN YOU GO TO THE LOCATION MAP? I WANT TO SEE IF I WANT TO KNOW WHAT I'M LOOKING AT,
[00:30:06]
WHAT THIS IS SURROUNDED BY. SO TO THE WEST IS THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, TO THE NORTH IS TO THE DIRECT NORTH IS A BUSINESS. AND THEN IS THAT SINGLE FAMILY? THERE'S TOWNHOMES HERE AT THE INTERSECTION OF CHARLESTON HIGH SCHOOL DRIVE AND BELOW THOSE TOWNHOMES, THERE'S SOME MULTIFAMILY FAMILY.AND THEN SOUTH OF LAKE HAVEN IS SINGLE FAMILY.
OKAY. AND THEN NORTH, THERE'S SOME MORE SINGLE FAMILY.
YES, NORTH OF HIGH SCHOOL DRIVE. IN FOR A WHILE.
YES. AND THE CHURCH'S PARKING LOT? YEAH. OKAY.
AND YOU'RE KIND OF CATTY CORNER ACROSS FROM MILL STREET ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AS WELL.
YEAH, I JUST THAT'S. I JUST SEE THAT CHARLES AND LAKE HAVEN BEING HEAVILY TRAVELED BECAUSE OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS, AND I'M JUST, I DON'T KNOW, I'M STILL NOT SOLD ON THE THE PARKING PARKING ISSUE.
I DON'T THINK CHARLES CARES. A LOT OF THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TRAFFIC, IT'S IT'S MORE HIGH SCHOOL AND COMING OFF THE INTERSTATE A LITTLE BIT OFF LAKE HAVEN. YEAH, I GO DOWN THAT STREET EVERY DAY.
THERE'S RARELY ANY TRAFFIC ON IT. THANK YOU. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO KEEP IN MIND, TOO, THAT THIS IS REALLY AN EXTENSION. IT'S NOT OLD TOWN, BUT I WOULD ENCOURAGE OUR FELLOW COMMISSIONERS TO CONSIDER THIS AN EXTENSION OF OUR CITY'S OLD TOWN. IT'S TWO BLOCKS AWAY. SO THE NEW DEVELOPMENT THERE, IT'S AN EMPTY LOT TODAY.
WE'RE BRINGING IN MORE ACTIVITY FOR OUR BUSINESSES IN THE OLD TOWN DISTRICT.
MORE RESIDENTS, MORE DENSITY. RIGHT PAST THAT CHARLES STREET YOU'LL SEE THAT SOUTH VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT RICK WAS TALKING ABOUT LAID OUT VERY SIMILAR, A LITTLE BIT TIGHTER. SO THE ALLEYS HERE ARE ACTUALLY WIDER TO THE POINT IN THE STREET RIGHT AWAY IS A LITTLE BIT WIDER THAN THAT OTHER DEVELOPMENT THERE.
AND ALSO FOR CLARIFICATION, CHARLES STREET IS A COLLECTOR STREET WITH A PAVEMENT WITH A 42FT.
SO IT'S ADEQUATELY HAS ADEQUATE WIDTH TO ACCOMMODATE PARKED CARS AND STILL HAVE WELL OVER 24FT ARE TWO 12 FOOT TRAVEL LANES. SO IT'S DESIGNED TO CARRY A LITTLE BIT HIGHER VOLUMES AND TO ACCOMMODATE ON STREET PARKING, SINCE THERE IS SOME EXISTING MULTIFAMILY TO THE EAST THAT DOES UTILIZE SOME SMALL STREET PARKING.
AND THEN JUST SO YOU GUYS CAN SEE, THIS IS BELVILLE VILLAGE.
AND SO THE DIFFERENCE HERE FROM THIS IS WE WOULD HAVE A WIDER PARKWAY AND TREES PLANTED BETWEEN THE PARKWAY AND THE HOMES, WHICH I THINK WOULD BE GENERALLY AN IMPROVEMENT TO THE STREETSCAPE. BUT IT WOULD FEEL GENERALLY KIND OF LIKE THIS. YOU'LL NOTICE THAT THERE. YES. THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT DO PARK ON THE STREET. BUT IT DOESN'T IMPEDE THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC OR SAFETY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND SO YOU CAN SEE HERE THERE'S SOME TREES PLANTED IN THE PARKWAY.
IT WOULD BE SOMETHING LIKE THAT. EXCEPT FOR WE WILL HAVE A WIDER PARKWAY HERE.
DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION? I MEAN, I LIKE I LIKE THE IDEA.
I JUST LIKE I SAID, I'M HUNG UP ON THE PARKING, SO.
AND IF I'M THE ONLY ONE, THEN THAT THAT'S THAT'S OKAY.
BUT, I MEAN, I LIKE THE IDEA. I UNDERSTAND ABOUT IT BEING JUST OUTSIDE OLD TOWN.
I'M JUST. I'M NOT AN ON STREET PARKING FAN, SO.
YEAH. MORE HEADS IN THE BED. LET'S BRING IT. I MEAN, I LIKE THE IDEA OF BRINGING MORE OWNERSHIP TO THIS AREA RATHER THAN JUST THE APARTMENTS.
APARTMENTS? APARTMENTS. I MEAN, WE REALLY NEED TO BRING SOME PERMANENT.
YOU KNOW, I DON'T LIKE TO USE THE WORD TRANSIENT HOMEOWNERS.
YOU KNOW, SOMEONE COULD BE IN A SIX MONTH LEASE AND THEN IT TURNS AROUND. I MEAN, WE REALLY NEED JUST, YOU KNOW, PUTTING MY REALTOR HAT ON FOR A MINUTE.
WE NEED SOME MORE. YEAH. HOMEOWNERS DOWN HERE.
ANYONE ELSE BEFORE I OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING? OPENING THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK MAY COME FORWARD. STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS, PLEASE.
AND WE'D BE HAPPY TO HEAR FROM YOU. HI, MY NAME IS VENKAT.
I HAVE A FEW CONCERNS. ONE OF THEM IS THE POTENTIAL, THE SAFETY.
BECAUSE THERE ARE SCHOOLS AROUND IT, RIGHT? VERY CLOSE BY.
[00:35:03]
AND BECAUSE OF THIS THERE IS AN IMPACT TO THE SCHOOL ZONE TRAFFIC.AND THEN THERE'S GOING TO BE POTENTIAL BOTTLENECKS.
AND TO THE ACCESS POINTS AND ALSO THE PARKING.
RIGHT. SO WHEN PEOPLE COME TO DROP OFF THE KIDS, THEY TEND TO PARK ON THE SIDES OF THE ROADS AND IT'S GOING TO CAUSE A LOT OF PROBLEMS. SO THAT'S ONE THING. AND THEN ALSO PROPERTY VALUE CONSIDERATIONS.
RIGHT. SO THESE ARE THE TOWNHOMES. SO PEOPLE TEND TO RENT VERSUS OWN.
SO THE PROPERTY VALUES ARE THEN WILL TEND TO GO DOWN RIGHT.
SO BECAUSE OF THAT AND THEN OTHER CONCERNS I HAVE IS WITH THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES. RIGHT. SO SO OVERALL THE, THE NEIGHBORHOOD THE LIVING ATMOSPHERE WILL CHANGE BECAUSE OF A LOT OF POPULATION INCREASE.
AND THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD WILL CHANGE.
SO WITH THE MORE DENSITY. RIGHT. SO BY OVERCROWDING THE AREAS.
AND AS I MENTIONED, TRAFFIC CONGESTION. CONGESTION.
AND ALSO REDUCE PRIVACY TO THE EXISTING HOMEOWNERS AND INCREASE NOISE LEVELS.
SO THEY TEND TO PARK ON THE, ON THE IN FRONT OF THE OTHER HOUSES.
RIGHT. SO THE, THE WHOLE SOCIAL DYNAMICS IN THAT AREA IS GOING TO CHANGE.
SO I WOULD LIKE TO BRING UP AND THEN WANTED TO OPPOSE THE ZONING CHANGE.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK.
HAVING NO ONE COME FORWARD. I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
COMMISSIONERS. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION? REAL FAST. IS THE DEVELOPER HERE? YES. LET ME REOPEN THE.
LET ME REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. JUST A QUICK QUESTION.
JUST TO HIT ON THIS POINT. OWNERSHIP VERSUS RENTING.
I'M SORRY. I CAN'T HEAR YOU. OWNERSHIP VERSUS RENTERS.
ARE THERE GOING TO BE ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS OR ANY MECHANISMS IN PLACE TO BALANCE OUT JUST INVESTORS COMING IN AND BUYING THESE AND PUTTING UP FOR RENT VERSUS STRAIGHT HOMEOWNERS OWNER OCCUPANTS? YES, MA'AM. ON OUR HOA THAT WE'VE WRITTEN.
A PERSON CANNOT PURCHASE MORE THAN TWO TO A PLACE.
OKAY. I'M SORRY THAT YOU CAN ONLY PURCHASE 1 OR 2.
PER OWNER IS WHAT YOU ARE ASKING ME. WELL, IS THERE GOING TO BE A PERCENTAGE CAP THOUGH? OF LEAST PROPERTIES VERSUS OWNER OCCUPANT PROPERTIES, THERE'S ONLY YOU CAN PURCHASE TWO HOMES AT A TIME UNDER ONE NAME OR WHATEVER IT IS, BUT OKAY. BUT THEN THEY COULD PUT BOTH OF THOSE UP FOR RENT.
NO THEY CANNOT. HOA SAYS THAT YOU CANNOT RENT.
OKAY, SO IT HAS TO BE OWNER OCCUPANT. THAT'S WHAT I WAS.
OKAY, SO I JUST WANTED TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION FOR THE GENTLEMAN OWNER CONCERN ALSO.
ON THAT SITE EVERYTHING'S GOOD TECH. THEY'VE BEEN THERE YOU KNOW.
WE HAVE REMOVED ALL THE ASBESTOS, ALL CLEAN. THANK YOU FOR THAT.
THANK YOU SIR. ANYONE ELSE BEFORE I CLOSE AGAIN? I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AGAIN. COMMISSIONERS, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ZONE.
CHANGE AS PRESENTED. SECOND. MOTION BY ARAM. SECOND BY AINSLIE.
YOU MAY VOTE NOW. FRANCESCA WAS THE SECOND. THANK YOU.
MOTION CARRIES SIX ONE. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS.
THIS ITEM WILL GO BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL FOR A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL THE 7TH.
THANK YOU. AT 7 P.M.. THANK YOU. MICHELE. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
NO ANNOUNCEMENTS. NO ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FEEDBACK.
IN THAT CASE, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN.
MOTION TO ADJOURN. MOTION BY FRANCESCA. SECOND BY JACK.
[00:40:07]
VOTE NOW. MOTION CARRIES SEVEN. ZERO.COMMISSIONERS. YOU WANT A BREAK BEFORE THE NEXT ONE, OR ROLL RIGHT ALONG.
ROLL RIGHT ALONG. OKAY. I WILL OPEN THE MARCH 4TH,
[G. Call to Order and Announce that a Quorum is Present.]
2025 TRANSPORTATION BOARD MEETING. THERE IS A QUORUM PRESENT, AND I WILL CALL THAT TO ORDER.FIRST ITEM IS APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM JULY 2ND, 2024.
[H. Approval of Minutes]
MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND MOTION BY RICK. SECOND BY FRANCESCA.I VOTE NOW. MOTION CARRIES SEVEN ZERO. WE HAVE A REGULAR HEARING.
[I. Regular Hearing]
CONSIDER AMENDING THE LEWISVILLE CITY CODE. CHAPTER 15, SECTION 15 THROUGH 137.PARKING RESTRICTIONS IN OLD TOWN ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT BY LIMITING PARKING ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILL STREET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF PARNELL STREET TO THE INTERSECTION OF MAIN STREET TO TWO HOUR PARKING.
BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 8 A.M. AND 5 P.M.. GOOD EVENING, BOARD MEMBERS.
WE WERE CONTACTED BY THE BUSINESS OWNERS ALONG MILL STREET ON THE EAST SIDE.
THERE'S A FEW LIMITED PARKING SPOTS THAT CUSTOMERS CAN USE, AND IT SEEMS THAT BECAUSE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE APARTMENTS, SOME PEOPLE, ALTHOUGH THE APARTMENTS HAVE ENOUGH ON SITE AND ON STREET PARKING, SOMETIMES THEY PARK IN THESE SPOTS FOR LONG TIMES DURING BUSINESS HOURS. SO THEY REQUESTED, AND WE HAVE A CHAPTER IN OUR CITY CODE THAT LIMITS THE TRAFFIC, THE PARKING DURING BUSINESS HOURS TO TWO HOURS. AND WE WANTED TO INCLUDE THIS SECTION.
AS YOU SEE, IT'S ABOUT TEN SPOTS AND IT WILL BE LIMITED ONLY TO TWO HOURS FROM 8 A.M.
TO 5 P.M.. I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
COMMISSIONER'S QUESTIONS. ARE THERE OTHER AREAS OF THE CITY THAT EMPLOY THIS LIMITED PARKING AND HOW IS IT ENFORCED? CAN YOU REPEAT THAT QUESTION AGAIN? ARE THERE ANY OTHER AREAS THAT ARE LIMITED FOR TWO HOUR PARKING IN THE VICINITY, AND HOW IS IT ENFORCED? ARE THERE THE YES, TO BE SPECIFIC, MAYBE IN OLD TOWN.
THERE ARE CHAPTER IN 15 THE SAME. CHAPTER 15 37 SPECIFIES TWO HOUR PARKING AND OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SIGHTING THESE VEHICLES AT PARK IN LONG HOURS.
DEFINITELY IT NEEDS TO BE REPORTED OR BE SPOTTED BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.
IT'S NOT. WE DON'T HAVE A PARK PARKING METER TO BE EXACT.
WE DON'T HAVE A PARKING METER TO TIME IT, BUT IT'S IT'S A MEAN TO LIMIT LONG HOURS OF PARKING.
AND THERE IS PROPER SIGNAGE, CORRECT? YES. SIGNAGE WILL BE INSTALLED TO INFORM.
I JUST I'VE NEVER SEEN ENFORCEMENT. I'VE, I'VE, WE USED TO HAVE A DOWNTOWN OLD TOWN PARKING PERSON WHO DROVE AROUND AND ENFORCED THAT, BUT I'VE GOTTEN A FEW OF THOSE ORANGE STICKERS IN MY TIME.
I'M NOT GOING TO LIE. OKAY, OKAY. YES WE HAVE.
YEAH. THANK YOU. SO. YEAH, WE USED TO SEE THAT IN FOSTER ALL THE TIME.
OH, YEAH, I GOT ONE. YEAH. BUT AT THE PARK. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMENTS, COMMISSIONERS? IF NOT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
MOTION TO APPROVE. MOTION. LIMITED PARKING ON MILL STREET, AS PRESENTED.
THANK YOU. FRANCESCA. MOTION BY FRANCESCA. SECOND BY JOSHUA.
THANK YOU. VOTE NOW. MOTION CARRIES SEVEN ZERO.
THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. AT THIS POINT, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN.
MOTION TO ADJOURN. THANK YOU. FRANCESCA. SECOND BY AINSLEY.
YOU MAY VOTE NOW. SEVEN ZERO. WE ARE ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.