Jun 02, 2025 City Council

WELL, YOU'RE A MINUTE LATE. I DON'T LIKE IT. JUST LETTING OFF THE GAS. I TAKE A WEEK OFF, AND

[00:00:06]

SO DON'T SAY IT IF YOU DON'T INTEND TO BROADCAST IT. I THINK FIRST UP HERE WE HAVE OUR WORKSHOP SESSION, WHICH IS DISCUSSION OF CONSENT AND REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS. YOU WANT TO DO CLOSED AFTER THAT OR BEFORE WE CAN GO THROUGH IT. IF WE GO BACK TO SO YEAH. SO WE'RE GOING TO DO CONSENT AGENDA DISCUSSION REAL QUICK. AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO BREAK INTO CLOSED SESSION FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY. OR JUST TO CLARIFY FOR. I DON'T KNOW WHICH ONE. LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE 551.071 CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY. ITEM NUMBER TWO. ITEM NUMBER TWO. OKAY. YOU WANT YOU WANT ME TO DO THAT AFTER WE GO THROUGH ALL OF IT? OR EITHER WAY, YOU WANT TO DO IT, THEN WE'LL DO IT THAT WAY. ALL RIGHT. SO WE'LL GO AHEAD AND GO THROUGH THE AGENDA. FIRST UP I'VE GOT THE INVOCATION. COUNCIL MEMBER MEREDITH, I'VE GOT A PLEDGE TO THE FLAGS. COUNCIL MEMBER TROYER. ITEM C1 PUBLIC HEARING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR SELF STORAGE FACILITY. QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON THAT. PUBLIC HEARING. NUMBER TWO, THIS IS THE REALM SUBDISTRICT PLAN DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. AND VISITOR CITIZENS FORUM. ITEM E CONSENT AGENDA. CONSENT AGENDA. ITEM NUMBER THREE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. ITEM NUMBER FOUR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LJA ENGINEERING. THIS IS FOR KING ARTHUR. PALMS UP. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU MA'AM. ITEM FIVE RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL RELATING TO DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY SECRETARY. THEN WE HAVE CITY COUNCIL AND STAFF REPORTS. WE DO HAVE OUR CITY SEMIANNUAL REPORT FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE. THAT WAS THAT REPORT IS IN YOUR PACKET. SO IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN THAT. AND THEN DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER CLOSED SESSION. YES. OH YEAH ONE. ITEM GOING CLOSE BEFORE ITEM FIVE. SUPER. THERE IS NO OTHER DISCUSSION OF CONSENT AND REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS. WE'RE GOING TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION PER 551 INVOCATION. ALL RIGHT. WE'RE GOING TO CALL THIS MEETING OF

[A. Invocation - Councilmember William Meridith]

[B. Pledge to the American and Texas Flags - Councilmember Bob Troyer]

WE DO HAVE SOME ADDITIONAL MATERIAL TO GO OVER IN OUR WORKSHOP. SO WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND PUT THE REGULAR SESSION ON PAUSE. WE'LL BE BACK IN A MOMENT. COUNCIL, IF WE

[H. Return to Workshop Session if Necessary]

[00:07:08]

BASICALLY IT STARTS WITH A LETTER NOTIFICATION THAT'S SENT TO PROPERTY OWNERS. YOU KNOW, TALKING ABOUT THE NUISANCE CRIMES THAT WE'RE SEEING. WE KIND OF DISCUSS HOW WE WOULD ADDRESS THOSE. THE OWNER EITHER SIGNS AND COMPLIES WITH THE CRIME REDUCTION AGREEMENT THAT WE COME UP WITH. AND THEN WE MOVE FORWARD WITH ANNUAL MONITORING AND REPORTING, AND WE LOOK AT HOW IT'S GOING AND KIND OF WORK WITH THEM AS IT GOES, OR WE DON'T GET ANY COOPERATION FROM THE MANAGEMENT OR THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY AND THEN MOVES TO THE LAWSUIT. SO THE WAY THAT WE'RE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD IS GOING TO HAVE MORE STEPS IN THAT, AND IT'S GOING TO BE A LITTLE MORE LENGTHY INVOLVED. AND WE'RE GOING TO DO ROUTINE MONTHLY, QUARTERLY, YEARLY AUDITING TO GIVE US A GOOD INSIGHT INTO WHAT'S GOING ON. SO EARLY INTERVENTION AGAIN, IS THE KEY. YOU KNOW, USING DATA DRIVEN APPROACH TO CRIME ANALYSIS, HAVING BOTH OUR OUR CRIME ANALYSIS, LOOK AT THE CALLS FOR SERVICE THAT ARE HAPPENING, SHOWING IT, BUT ALSO USING OUR GEOGRAPHIC ACCOUNTABILITY, OUR OFFICERS, OUR SERGEANTS, OUR CAPTAINS THAT ARE IN THE DISTRICTS KEEPING AN EYE AND LOOKING AT THE CRIME STATS. SO INCLUSION IN THE NAP

[00:10:02]

YEAH, THE NUMBER OF PROPERTIES BASED ON THE HIGHEST, THE PROPERTIES, LIKE THE TOP TEN PROPERTIES THAT HAVE THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF OFFENSES, THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY WHAT WE DID. SO WE HAD LIMITED IT TO THE HOTELS OR EXTENDED STAYS. AND THEN WE SAID WE'RE GOING TO TAKE THE TOP ONE OR TOP TWO BECAUSE WE JUST WE WERE REALLY KIND OF STARTING ON THIS PROCESS HERE. AND THEY'LL GO THROUGH THIS MORE IS THAT THEY'RE SETTING A STANDARD. SO IF YOU HIT A CERTAIN NUMBER OF OFFENSES OR ARRESTS ON THAT, THEN THEN YOU GET KICKED INTO THE PROGRAM. SO IT'S ACROSS THE BOARD. BUT YOU'LL SEE WHAT WHAT THE RESULTS ARE. ONCE WE SET THOSE THRESHOLDS, YOU'LL SEE WHAT THOSE BUSINESSES ARE. OKAY. AND MY QUESTION IS, HAS THERE EVER BEEN A COMPANY THAT SAID, NO, I'M NOT ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT WITH YOU? NOT THAT I'M AWARE OF. I KNOW WE ONLY HAD 2 OR 3 PROPERTIES THAT EVEN ROSE TO THE THRESHOLD WHEN WE DID IN 2017, 2018. THIS IS 2025 NOW.

WELL, AND ONE THING YOU'LL SEE WHEN YOU SEE THE BUDGET SUITES OF AMERICA UP HERE IN A MINUTE, I THINK WHEN YOU SEE THEIR NUMBERS, I, I CAN'T PROVE THIS BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE THE ANECDOTAL DATA TO BACK IT UP. BUT THERE AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF THE LIST AND THOSE OFFENSES WE ARE NOT SEEING AT THAT LOCATION CURRENTLY, AND I THINK NEW MANAGEMENT HAS BEEN A BIG PART OF IT. YEAH, I WILL I DID WANT TO ADD JUST BECAUSE I WAS HERE WHEN WE FIRST STARTED, THAT WAS ACTUALLY BEING IN THE IN THE PROGRAM, WORKING WITH THE POLICE OFFICERS. THEY ACTUALLY WERE TO THE POINT AT ONE POINT OF FALLING OFF BECAUSE THEIR NUMBERS WERE SO LOW, BUDGET BUDGET SUITES WERE GETTING SO MUCH BETTER. SO IT DOES WORK IF YOU WORK IT WHEN YOU'LL SEE THEY WOULD SOMETIMES QUALIFY JUST FOR EARLY INTERVENTION, BUT THEY HAVE NOT RISEN TO THE LEVEL OF QUALIFYING FOR THE NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROGRAM. YES, SIR. AND WHAT I'M HEARING IN CHRISTINE'S QUESTION WAS MORE OF A WE HAD LIMITED BANDWIDTH INTERNALLY TO HANDLE EVERYBODY. IF WE DID EVERYBODY, I'M ASSUMING BASED ON THE PRESENTATION I'VE LOOKED AT, THAT'S NOT AN ISSUE ANYMORE.

WELL, IT'S NOT AN ISSUE WITH THE NUMBERS THAT WE'VE SEEN. SO YEAH, WE'RE LOOKING AT IT. THE PLAN IS, IS THAT IF YOU QUALIFY, THERE IS GOING TO BE SOME SORT OF EARLY INTERVENTION AND SOME SORT OF MOVE FORWARD INTO THE PROGRAM. THERE IS NO RIGHT NOW ANTICIPATED, OKAY. IF WE GET 15 BUSINESSES IN HERE, WE'RE GOING TO CUT IT OFF THAT THAT IS NOT THE PLAN. AND PART OF THAT WILL ALSO HELP THAT THIS IS ALSO YOU'VE GOT NEIGHBORHOOD RESOURCE OFFICERS THAT ARE MANAGING, BUT THEN YOU'VE GOT, QUITE FRANKLY, 88 PATROL OFFICERS AND 12 PATROL SERGEANTS AND TWO CAPTAINS AND A CAPTAIN OVER THE SRO UNIT. THAT IS ALL GOING TO BE INVOLVED IN THIS. AND IT DOESN'T JUST FALL TO TWO, THREE, FOUR, SIX. AND THAT IS DEFINITELY DIFFERENT THAN BEFORE. YEAH, I LIKE THIS.

SO THE ENHANCEMENTS WHICH WE'VE WE'VE TALKED ABOUT IN HERE. SO WE'RE EXPANDING THE ELIGIBILITY.

IT WILL NOT BE JUST THE HOTEL MOTEL THE EXTENDED STAY. IT'S GOING TO BE I MEAN BASED ON CALLS FOR SERVICE AND THE CRIMES THAT HAPPEN, NOT BASED ON JUST WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS THAT IT

[00:15:02]

[00:20:02]

SO IN 2023, THERE'S THE OFFENSES YOU SEE IN 2024. AND THE OTHER THING I WANT YOU TO SEE IS KIND OF HOW THE NUMBERS CAN FLUCTUATE FROM YEAR TO YEAR, WHICH CAN BE A MULTITUDE OF THINGS. IT COULD BE A CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP. IT COULD BE A CHANGE OF ENFORCEMENT STRATEGY THAT LPD HAD. IT COULD BE THEY'VE GOTTEN IN TROUBLE FOR SOMETHING PRETTY SERIOUS, AND THEY'VE HAD TO SERIOUSLY REVAMP WHAT THEY WERE DOING WITH SHOPLIFTING. BE A TRIGGER EVENT. SHOPLIFTING IN ITSELF IS NOT A NUISANCE CRIME. BUT AGAIN, WHAT I WAS SAYING WAS IT'S THE SHOPLIFTING THAT LED TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF A LOT OF THESE NUISANCE ABATEMENT CRIMES. WHETHER IT BE, YOU KNOW, WE FIND WEAPONS, WE FIND DRUGS, THINGS OF THAT NATURE. SO IF YOU LOOK AT THE COMMERCIAL ARREST STATS AND SO I WOULD LOVE TO TAKE CREDIT FOR THIS, BUT CLAIRE IS THE ONE THAT CAME UP WITH THIS HIGHLIGHTING STRATEGY OF THE NUMBERS. AND I NEVER WOULD HAVE SEEN THIS IF SHE HADN'T COME UP WITH THIS. SO I WANT TO POINT OUT, IF YOU LOOK AND YOU SEE A LOT OF THE GREEN THAT WE WOULD HAVE SEEN, THAT MAYBE WE COULD HAVE BEEN IN FRONT OF BEFORE IT TURNED TO YELLOW. THAT'S THE FIRST THING THAT POPPED UP ON ME WHEN I SAW COLOR CODING. IT WAS LIKE, OH YEAH, THAT DOES MAKE SENSE. SO THAT I THINK IS GOING TO HELP US AND KIND OF SHOWS HOW DOING IT QUARTERLY CAN HELP YOU GET OUT IN FRONT OF WHAT YOU SEE AND GET IN FRONT OF PROBLEMS HERE BEFORE IT BECOMES PROBLEMS HERE. BUT THAT'S THAT'S KIND OF THE PLAN OF HOW THAT LOOKS. AND YOU CAN KIND OF SEE YOU HAVE A FEW THAT HAVE JUST JUMPED OUT THE WALMARTS BOTH. I KNOW YOU LOOK AT WALMART HERE. AND AGAIN, A LOT OF THAT COMES FROM OTHER CRIMES THAT ARE HAPPENING THERE. AND I DON'T KNOW THAT WE'LL BE ABLE TO DRIVE WALMART DOWN TO A ZERO, BUT WE WILL ALSO WORK WITH THEM AS WELL. IT'S NOT JUST BECAUSE THE CRIMES THAT THEY'RE REPORTING ARE LEADING TO IT. WE WILL WORK AND DO STUFF TO HELP THEM AS WELL TO ADDRESS THOSE ISSUES AS BEST THAT WE CAN. SEVERAL YEARS AGO, THERE WAS A LARGE REPORT PUT OUT ON WALMART AND HOW THEY HAD REDUCED THEIR SECURITY AT THEIR FACILITIES AS OSTENSIBLY MOVING THAT ENFORCEMENT OUT TO OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT, ADDING MORE POLICE.

AND THAT'S SOMETHING YOU SEE OCCASIONALLY. I MEAN, WHEN PLACES HAVE THEY HAVE BUDGETS AS WELL, AND THAT'S GENERALLY ONE OF THE FIRST BUDGETS TO GO. SO THAT'S, THAT'S I THINK THAT'S INTERESTING. AND WE'LL BE TELLING OF, YOU KNOW, WHAT CHANGES WITHIN THE FOUR WALLS.

ABSOLUTELY. THEN WHEN YOU TAKE A LOOK AT RESIDENTIAL AND WHEN WE TAKE RESIDENTIAL REALLY WITH RESIDENTIAL, ALL WE INCLUDED WERE OF COURSE RESIDENCES. AND THEN THE EXTENDED STAY LOCATIONS, THE HOTELS AND THE MOTELS. WE INCLUDED THOSE IN COMMERCIAL. SO WHEN YOU LOOK THERE, SUBURBAN STUDIOS, WHICH IS OVER ON LAKEPOINT DRIVE, ARBOR CREEK, I KNOW SUBURBAN OR ARBOR CREEK. I WAS TOLD THIS BY ONE OF THE OFFICERS THAT THEY GOT NEW MANAGEMENT SOMEWHERE RIGHT IN THAT PERIOD. AND WHEN THEY GOT NEW MANAGEMENT, THIS MANAGEMENT WAS VERY AGGRESSIVE ON DEALING WITH ISSUE TENANTS OR TENANTS THAT CAUSED ISSUES IN THEIR BUILDING, AND IT REALLY DROVE CRIME DOWN. AND THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT YOU'RE RIGHT, IT CAN HAVE. THE BIGGEST IMPACT IS THE MANAGEMENT THAT'S THERE, THE PRIVATE RESIDENCE. I KNOW THAT 24 IS GOING TO JUMP OUT. I DON'T PUT AN ADDRESS ON HERE, YOU KNOW, DUE TO PRIVACY REASONS, BUT YOU'LL SEE THAT WE HAD ZERO AND 24. I CAN TELL YOU THOSE WE ARE NOT AT THAT POINT TODAY WE ARE AT A HANDFUL OF OFFENSES. THAT WAS AN ISSUE WE DEALT WITH IN ONE QUARTER. MATTER OF FACT, IF YOU CAN LOOK ON IT, YOU CAN SEE REALLY QUARTER FOR A LITTLE BIT AND QUARTER TWO. BUT WE HAD AN ISSUE WITH THE TENANT THAT WAS LIVING IN A RESIDENCE THAT WAS OWNED BY THEIR GRANDPARENTS. SO THIS IS ONE SINGLE RESIDENCE. IT IS. WOW. OKAY. I AM SHOCKED AND AMAZED THAT WE HAVE NOT BEEN LIT UP AT CITY COUNCIL ABOUT THAT. YOU MIGHT SOME OF YOU MIGHT HAVE BEEN. I KNOW WE HAVE HISTORICALLY WE WERE WE GET WE GET WE GET THOSE SPECIAL PEOPLE. AND I KNEW RIGHT OFF THAT ADDRESS WE TARGETED SOME SOME ENFORCEMENT HAD SOME HELP AND PART OF THE FAMILY MOVED OUT.

AND I THINK IT WAS THE PART THAT WAS CAUSING THE MAJORITY OF THE ISSUES, BECAUSE IT'S NOT ZERO TODAY, BUT IT'S NOT 7 OR 8. AND WE'VE REALLY DRIVEN THAT DOWN BY JUST GETTING RID OF IT. JUST GOES TO SHOW, IT JUST TAKES ONE PERSON THERE THAT'S CAUSING PROBLEMS AND IT GETS DRIVEN

[00:25:02]

SO WHAT WE HAVE IS PRETTY AUTOMATED. NOW. THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE HAS BEEN PRETTY CLEAR WITH US ON JUST TRYING TO FOLLOW WHAT THE DEFINITION OF A LAW FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT IS AND MAKE THAT THE REPORT. WE DON'T HAVE TO TAKE ACTION ON EVERY SINGLE THING THAT COMES ACROSS SOME OF THOSE, LIKE WALMART. WE HAVE A GOOD PARTNERSHIP WITH WALMART. WE PROBABLY WOULDN'T MAIL THEM A LETTER, RIGHT? WE WOULD JUST HAVE OUR ONGOING DIALOG. BUT THE REPORT THAT WE RUN IS NOW AUTOMATED AND REQUIRES NOT AS MUCH HUMAN INTERVENTION AS IT USED TO BE. YEAH. SO. YES, SIR. THAT'S GREAT. YEAH. BECAUSE I'M JUST WHEN YOU ADD RESIDENTIAL TO THAT, YOU'VE JUST THAT'S A, THAT'S A WHOLE OTHER ORDER OF MAGNITUDE FOR PEOPLE FALL THROUGH. SO I'M GLAD WE GOT IT. I'M EXCITED TO SEE THAT. I THINK THERE'LL BE MORE TO COME. SO THANK YOU GUYS. APPRECIATE IT. ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING ELSE. ALL RIGHT. WE'RE DONE WITH WORKSHOP.

WE'LL MOVE ALL RIGHT. WE'RE GOING TO GO BACK INTO REGULAR SESSION. ITEM

[C. Public Hearing]

[00:30:01]

DALLAS, TEXAS. HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. A LITTLE DISAPPOINTED YOU DON'T HAVE LIVE MUSIC LEFT LIKE AFTER PLANNED COMMISSION. THAT WAS PRETTY NICE TO COME TO PLAN, COMMISSION AND HAVE A LIVE SHOW AFTERWARDS. I THINK ALL ZONING CASES OUGHT TO WORK THAT WAY. YOU KNOW, THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPONSOR THAT IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT THAT LATER ON. I'M SURE THAT'S RIGHT.

THAT'S GOOD. WE'RE EXCITED ABOUT THIS. STAFF WAS GREAT TO WORK WITH ON IT. PLANNING COMMISSION GAVE US UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION. THIS SEEMS LIKE AN IDEAL SITUATION WHERE WE'RE REINVESTING AT A SIGNIFICANT PLACE WHERE THE CITY GETS THE BENEFIT OF THAT 10 MILLION PLUS DOLLARS OF AD VALOREM VALUE. AND WE'RE EXCITED TO DO THAT. IT'S NOT REALLY AN INDEPENDENTLY DEVELOPABLE SITE FOR ANYONE ELSE, SO IT SEEMS LIKE THAT IT'S A WIN WIN FOR EVERYBODY, AND WE ARE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE. I'VE GOT A PRESENTATION, BUT SINCE YOU GOT OFF TO A SLOWER START AND I DON'T HAVE OPPOSITION, I'D BE NICE TO NOT DO IT. THAT'S FAIR, THAT'S FAIR. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION THERE, COUNSEL. ANYBODY HAVE ANY OTHER? I HAVE NO OTHER PUBLIC COMMENT REQUESTS HERE. IF THERE ARE NO FURTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY THANK YOU FOR REINVESTING IN OUR COMMUNITY.

AND WITH THAT, I WILL MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND COUNCIL. PLEASE VOTE. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCIL. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE. MOVE TO APPROVE THE ORDINANCES SET FORTH IN THE CAPTION. SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION TO SECOND COUNCIL. PLEASE VOTE. ALL RIGHT. AND THE MOTION TO APPROVE IS APPROVED. SIX TO NOTHING. THANK YOU COUNCIL. THANK YOU SIR. NEXT UP, ITEM TWO CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING. WE ARE

[I. Closed Session]

[J. Reconvene]

[00:35:02]

THERE WAS ALSO THERE'S ALSO LANGUAGE IN THE PD THAT DEFINES THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A MINOR MODIFICATION, WHICH CAN BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR, VERSUS A MAJOR MODIFICATION MODIFICATION. MAJOR MODIFICATIONS INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR REMOVAL OF BUILDING, AND CHANGES TO SITE CIRCULATION PATTERN THAT IMPACTS CONNECTIVITY WITHIN THE SITE INTO SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT, AND AGAIN, IN THOSE TYPE OF SITUATIONS, IT DOES REQUIRE THE AMENDMENT PROCESS THROUGH THE REZONING PROCESS. THERE ARE SEVERAL AREAS WITHIN THE REALM THAT REMAIN BLANK DUE TO THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT DETAILS. HOWEVER, THOSE SITES STILL HAVE THE BASE ZONING, SO I WANT TO MAKE IT VERY CLEAR THAT THE BASE ZONING THAT WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1996 AND FURTHER AMENDED IN 2014 ESTABLISHES THE USES, THE SETBACKS AND THE HEIGHTS. AND SO THOSE ARE REALLY NOT ON THE TABLE TONIGHT. THOSE WERE ESTABLISHED AT THAT TIME. THIS IS NOT A BASE ZONING CHANGE. IT'S ONLY A CHANGE TO THE CONCEPT PLAN, AMENDMENT. AND AGAIN, A CONCEPT PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE BLANK AREAS ARE CAN BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR. SO THIS MAP JUST SHOWS THE BOUNDARIES OF THE REALM. THE REALM IS SUBDIVIDED INTO SUB AREAS. THE RED AREA IS NORTHWIND HAVEN PARKWAY. AND THIS IS JUST FOR THE PURPOSES OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CONCEPT PLAN. THEN OF COURSE YOU GOT THE BLUE IS THE SOUTHERN AREA THAT IS SOUTH OF WINDHAVEN PARKWAY. AGAIN, THIS MAP SHOWS THE BASE DISTRICTS

[00:40:05]

IT WAS REALLY HARD TO TELL WHAT IT WAS. WITH THE MOST RECENT SUBMITTAL FROM MCADAMS, IT DID.

THEY WERE PROVIDED A LITTLE BIT MORE CLEARER, CLEARER IMAGE THAT WHEN YOU DO ZOOM IN, IT DOES SHOWS MORE CLEARLY THAT THOSE WERE WERE NUMBERS. SO IT WAS MERELY NUMBERING THE POTENTIAL LOTS OR TRACKS ILLUSTRATED AROUND THE SMALL CUL DE SAC. SO SITE CIRCULATION CHANGE IS CONSIDERED A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO THE CONCEPT PLAN, AND IT DOES REQUIRE APPROVAL THROUGH THE ZONE CHANGE PROCESS. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT ILLUSTRATES ONE BUILDING OF ABOUT 14,000FT■, SITUATED CLOSER TO PARKER ROAD, WITH SITE CIRCULATION CIRCLING AROUND THE PROPOSED BUILDING INSTEAD OF IN FRONT OF IT. ANOTHER CAVEAT TO THIS SITUATION IS DURING THE PLANNING PROCESS, THE AN 80 TO 120 FOOT WIDE ELECTRIC UTILITY EASEMENT WAS IDENTIFIED, AND THAT RUNS ADJACENT TO THE RAILROAD, SO THAT FURTHER CONSTRAINED THE LOCATION OF BUILDINGS ON THE SITE. THE FINAL PLAT WAS APPROVED IN JUNE 22ND. IT WAS REPORTED IN APRIL OF 23, AND WITH THAT ORIGINAL PLAT ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE, WATER AND SEWER WAS EXTENDED TO THE SITE, AND IT WAS SIZED TO SERVE A POTENTIAL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE. SO AGAIN, WE WANT TO STRESS THAT THE USES PROPOSED IN THE BUILDING AND THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING ARE NOT ELEMENTS UNDER CONSIDERATION TONIGHT WITH THIS CONCEPT PLAN AMENDMENT. AND THEN THESE ARE JUST THE ILLUSTRATIONS. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE LEFT IS THE

[00:45:03]

THIS IS WHAT FM 544 LOOKS LIKE. AND THEN THIS IS THE PROPOSED PLAN. AS RICHARD HAD TALKED ABOUT, THE THIS IS NOT A ZONING CHANGE. WE ARE ASKING FOR THE SAME ZONING THAT IT HAS ALWAYS FELL UNDER. THIS IS SIMPLY JUST A DISCUSSION OF SITE CIRCULATION PER THE PD. IT REQUIRES A CONVERSATION, A PROCESS TO GO THROUGH THE PLANNING, ZONING AND COUNCIL SO THAT WAY THEY CAN SEE

[00:50:06]

SO ALL OF THAT HAS BEEN PUT ON THIS PROPOSED PLAN, WHICH WILL BE A REGULATORY DOCUMENT THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO FOLLOW. AND THEN TALKING ABOUT SITE CONDITIONS. SO WE ARE NOT ADJACENT TO OR LOCATED WITHIN 100FT OF A RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICT. SO WE ARE WE HAVE TO FOLLOW THE FAA REGULATIONS WITH THAT, THAT THAT DOESN'T REALLY HAVE A SET HEIGHT LIMIT. SO THE HEIGHT CAN BE ENDLESS IN IN THIS CASE TO SOME EXTENT. OBVIOUSLY YOU CAN'T GO TOO CRAZY, BUT THE BUILDING ALSO IS SET BACK 350FT AWAY FROM THE EDGE OF A RESIDENT TO THE FRONT OF A GLASS OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. AND THEN THOSE ARE SOME IMAGES AT THAT HEIGHT. SO HOW IS THIS COHESIVE WITH THE EXISTING LAND USE? WE'RE GOING TO TALK THROUGH A COUPLE OF EXAMPLES. THIS IS ALL WITHIN CASTLE HILLS AND WHAT IS BEING PRESENTED. SO AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, YOU SEE SINGLE FAMILY ACROSS FROM MULTI-FAMILY. AND THE SETBACKS ARE AT 7140 AND 120. AND THIS WAS APPROVED BACK IN NOVEMBER OF 2024. AND THEN YOU CAN SEE HERE AGAIN YOU HAVE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS TOWNHOME LOTS ACROSS FROM MULTI-FAMILY. THAT'S AT 167 AND THEN 70FT. SO WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING IS ABOUT 350FT.

SO IT IS A GREATER INCREASE OF A SETBACK THAN WHAT YOU SEE AROUND CASTLE HILLS EXISTING TODAY.

TOUCHING ON THE TRAFFIC CONCERNS, WE ARE UPDATING A TIA FOR THE OVERALL THE REALM SUBDISTRICT, BUT ALSO WE HAVE DONE A TIA ON THIS SPECIFIC SITE ITSELF WHICH WARRANTED A TRAFFIC SIGNAL. AND WE ARE. WE HAVE AGREED TO PUT A NOTE ON THE PLAN THAT WE WOULD BE AT. THE DEVELOPER WOULD BE THE ONE WHO WOULD PAY FOR THE COST OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL. SO THAT'S ALSO ON THE PLAN AS WELL, TO ENSURE THAT IT GETS BUILT. AND THEN HOW ARE WE ADDRESSING CONCERNS COHESIVE WITH LAND USE? IT'S FOLLOWING THE ZONING. WHAT'S ALWAYS BEEN ZONED AS SAME SAME STANDARD AS THOSE LISTED WITHIN THE ZONING CODE. IT PROVIDES CERTAINTY BECAUSE WE'RE PROVIDING A CERTAIN HEIGHT LIMIT. WE'RE PROVIDING THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS THAT CAN BE BUILT, THOSE SORTS OF THINGS ON THE ACTUAL PLAN VERSUS THE PREVIOUS PLAN DIDN'T HAVE ANY OF THAT EXISTING. TODAY. WE INCREASED THE SETBACK. WE IMPROVED TRAFFIC BY ADDING A TRAFFIC SIGNAL. AND THEN IT'S COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING LAND USE WITHIN THE CASTLE HILLS DISTRICT. YOU CAN SEE IT EVERYWHERE. AND THEN THE CONSTRAINTS ON THE PROPERTY. IT IS A INTERESTING SHAPED PIECE OF PROPERTY. AND THEN YOU ALSO HAVE THOSE ENCORE EASEMENTS. SO YOU'RE KIND OF LIMITED TO WHAT YOU CAN DO, BUT ALSO YOU'RE ALSO TRYING TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S

[00:55:04]

DONNA VIDAL OPPOSED. PATRICIA HOFF OPPOSED. ERIC MILLER OPPOSED. DARCY WELSH OPPOSED.

FALCON. GARCIA OPPOSED JEFF. STACY RICHARDSON OPPOSED. KRISTEN GARCIA OPPOSED. PATRICIA CROP OPPOSED, AND CLINT ADAMS OPPOSED. THOSE ARE OUR EMAILS. OUR PUBLIC SPEAKING CARDS, FOLKS WHO ARE EXPRESSING AN OPINION BUT DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK. SOME OF THESE ARE OVERLAPPING WITH THE EMAILS. SO WE DO HAVE PATRICIA KOPP OPPOSED CHANDLER AND BETHANY TARR OPPOSED.

BEVERLY PORTER OPPOSED. JULIE LEWIS OPPOSED CHRIS LEWIS OPPOSED. JOHN. MY APOLOGIES.

JOHN POLANSKI OPPOSED. KYLE BORNSTEDT OPPOSED. JOAN SIGMON OPPOSED. MELISSA PIPER OPPOSED.

A.R. PORTER OPPOSED LAURENCE MAGUIRE OPPOSED WILLIAM HEPBURN OPPOSED WILLIAM. PALMER OPPOSED.

HERBERT BATES, OPPOSED TANYA LINN, OPPOSED. RENEE LAWSON OPPOSED. PATTY RADCLIFFE OPPOSED MARK AND LORI CONNELLY OPPOSED JAMES RADCLIFFE OPPOSED GARY VA. MOORESVILLE OPPOSED CHARLES FISHER OPPOSED DARRYL AND CAROLYN BASGALL OPPOSED. MY APOLOGIES, FOLKS, IF I GET THESE WRONG, PLEASE HAVE GIVE ME JUST A LITTLE BIT OF GRACE. I'VE GOT MARTIN VAUGHT OPPOSED. I'VE GOT BILL PRIEST OPPOSED, JOYCE LANDRY OPPOSED. TRACY JACOBS OPPOSED MARSHALL. LINCOLN SUPPORT. MEGAN EICHENLAUB OPPOSED. MICHAEL I CAN I CAN BORROW OPPOSED. YOUNG PARK OPPOSED. KAREN HAHN OPPOSED. KEN AND JESSE ARE OPPOSED. PAT HOFF OPPOSED PEGGY ALLEN. ROD ELLEN MEADE OPPOSED. CHARLES HUMMER OPPOSED. SANDY CORDNER OPPOSED. KATHLEEN DOCKERY OPPOSED. KEVIN CORDER, OPPOSED. NANCY HEPBURN OPPOSED. BARBARA MARTIN OPPOSED. JAN MILLER OPPOSED. BRIT DOCKERY OPPOSED. PATRICIA COOK OPPOSED. MARK JONES OPPOSED. MELINDA MCMAHON OPPOSED BETH COWER, OPPOSED LISA RESNICK, OPPOSED ROBERT BURKE, OPPOSED MARY PRYOR, OPPOSED NORMA RUIZ OPPOSED. NAN REES OPPOSED AMANDA DUNCAN, OPPOSED. LADONNA PIPER OPPOSED. SYDNEY TRAN, OPPOSED SCOTT TRAN, OPPOSED DARCY WALSH, OPPOSED. SUE LARSON OPPOSED. TOM BRAND, OPPOSED GLENN LARSON,

[01:00:05]

THANK YOU. MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL STAFF. THIS IS A LITTLE PERSONAL TO ME, AND I STATED THAT THE LAST TIME MY WIFE AND I LITERALLY JUST MOVED INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS ALL OF THIS WAS GOING ON AND NOTHING WAS EVER BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION ABOUT THIS MATTER UNTIL AFTER WE SIGNED A DOTTED LINE. THIS SITUATION HAS BECOME VERY PERSONAL TO NOT ONLY MYSELF, BUT ALSO MY NEW FAMILY, BECAUSE WE INVESTED OVER THREE QUARTERS OF $1 MILLION TO MOVE INTO OUR FIRST HOME TOGETHER AS A FAMILY. AND ONCE WE MOVED IN, WE'RE TOLD THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A 60 BUILDING IN OUR BACKYARD. JUST SO HAPPENS THAT OUR ONLY OUTDOOR SPACE LOOKS DIRECTLY AT THIS PLOT OF LAND. SO NOT ONLY IS THERE A STRONG POTENTIAL OF TAKING SIGNIFICANT HIT FINANCIALLY IN THE HOUSE THAT COULD POSSIBLY NEVER PROVIDE A RETURN DUE TO THIS PROJECT, BUT NOW OUR PRIVACY HAS BEEN COMPLETELY TAKEN FROM US. WE ARE BASICALLY RESTRICTED TO STAY IN THE HOUSE IF WE WANT PRIVACY, BECAUSE OUR FENCED IN BACKYARD NO LONGER WILL BE A PLACE OF PRIVACY. SO I HAVE TO ASK THE QUESTION, HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF THIS WERE YOU AND YOUR NEW FAMILY MOVED IN HERE? WE BOUGHT INTO THIS COMMUNITY BECAUSE IT IS GATED, PRIVATE, QUIET AND PEACEFUL. TO ONLY KNOW THAT OUR PRIVACY AND PEACEFULNESS WOULD BE RIPPED AWAY FROM US IN LESS THAN A MONTH. AND NOW I HAVE TO ATTEND THESE MEETINGS OVER AND OVER IN HOPES THAT WE GET EVERYONE TO UNDERSTAND OUR SIDE OF THE STORY AND ALL OF OUR CONCERNS. SO NOT ONLY ARE WE ARE ALL OF THESE TAKEN AWAY FROM US, BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, YOU'RE TAKING AWAY MY FAMILY TIME BECAUSE I HAVE TO BE HERE TO STAND UP FOR OUR COMMUNITY. BECAUSE I'M FIGHTING FOR WHAT'S REASONABLE, RIGHT AND FAIR FOR OUR COMMUNITY AND ITS SURROUNDINGS. THEN THERE'S THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM, PROPERTY VALUES, WHICH I MENTIONED BEFORE. HOW DO WE EVER SELL OUR HOME WHEN IT'S IN A SHADOW OF A FIVE STORY BUILDING? HOW ARE WE COMPENSATED? MAYBE SOME OF THE REVENUE FROM THIS PROPOSED BUILDING SHOULD GO TO THE SURROUNDING RENTS. WHO ARE

[01:05:03]

I'D ALSO LIKE TO TALK ABOUT THE DRONE PHOTOS THAT HAVE BEEN PRESENTED. THESE PHOTOS ARE VERY MISLEADING AS THEY'RE SHOT WITH A WIDE ANGLE LENS, WHICH IS NOT WHAT THE HUMAN EYE SEES. IN REALITY, THIS PROPOSED BUILDING WOULD BE MUCH CLOSER AND WAY MORE INTRUSIVE THAN THEY ARE TRYING TO LEAD YOU TO BELIEVE. YOU'LL SEE PHOTOS TONIGHT THAT PROVIDE A REALISTIC VIEW FROM THE HUMAN EYE. AS MY FRUSTRATION HAS INCREASINGLY GROWN SINCE WE HAVE MOVED INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, I'D LIKE TO PROVIDE A QUICK DEFINITION FOR US ALL TO CONSIDER. AND THAT IS THE MEANING OF BUSINESS ETHICS. BUSINESS BUSINESS ETHICS ARE THE MORAL PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS THAT GUIDE BUSINESS BEHAVIOR. THEY ENCOMPASS VALUES LIKE & HONESTY, INTEGRITY, FAIRNESS, AND ACCOUNTABILITY, IMPACTING ALL ASPECTS OF THE BUSINESS OPERATIONS. THESE PRINCIPLES EXTEND BEYOND LEGAL REQUIREMENTS, SETTING A CODE OF CONDUCT THAT SHAPES ACTIONS AND FOSTERS TRUST WITH EVERYONE ELSE. I BRING THIS TO EVERYONE'S ATTENTION BECAUSE AS I STARTED TO DIG IN LITTLE BY LITTLE AND HEAR MORE OF THE STORY I LEARNED, I HAVE SIGNIFICANTLY, SIGNIFICANTLY QUESTIONED THE ETHICAL STANDPOINT OF THIS DEVELOPER WE SIT WITH HERE TONIGHT TO KNOW THAT US AS RESIDENTS HAVE BEEN LIED TO IN THE CITY, HAS BEEN LIED TO. I NOW WANT TO ADDRESS SOME MISLEADING STATEMENTS THAT CONTINUE TO SHOW UP IN THE BACKGROUND INFORMATION OF THE STAFF MEMORANDUMS. IT STATES THAT THE APPLICANT MET WITH THE RESIDENTS. UNFORTUNATELY, THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED FOR OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. IT'S ONLY HAPPENED FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF PARKER, ESPECIALLY. I KNOW FOR CERTAIN IT HASN'T HAPPENED SINCE I'VE LIVED THERE. WE AS A COMMUNITY WANT TO MAKE IT VERY CLEAR TO EVERYONE HERE TONIGHT THAT WE WERE NOT INVITED. OUR RESIDENTS STILL HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY NOTIFICATION AS TO ANY DEVELOPER COMMUNITY MEETING WITH OUR RESIDENTS, EVEN THOUGH THE DEVELOPER MET WITH RESIDENTS NORTH OF PARKER ROAD IN THE REALM. IN MY OPINION, I HAVE TO SAY THAT THIS DECISION HAS BEEN CALCULATED BY THE DEVELOPER AND QUITE FRANKLY, IS SPINELESS. IN THE APRIL MEETING, MR. STANLEY WAS ASKED ABOUT NOTICES TO HOMEOWNERS. MR. STANLEY ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THE RESIDENTS NORTH OF PARKER ROAD WERE NOTIFIED BY MAIL VISUALLY. BUT THE RESERVE RESIDENTS, THOSE OF US ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PARKER, WERE NOT. HE WAS CERTAIN TO LET EVERYBODY KNOW THAT HE SENT OUT OVER 600 LETTERS IN THE MAIL. BUT ONCE AGAIN, MY QUESTION OF ETHICS RESURFACED HERE. AS MR. STANLEY STATED, WE LIVE IN A GATED COMMUNITY, AND BECAUSE WE ARE TREATED A LITTLE DIFFERENT WORD FOR WORD. PERSONALLY, I WISH I KNEW WHAT HE WAS TRYING TO INSINUATE ABOUT OUR COMMUNITY AS I FEEL WE WERE BEING SLIGHTED. MR. STANLEY STATED THAT THE THEY ONLY SENT A NOTICE TO OUR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT FIRM, OUR RESERVE BOARD AND OUR PROPERTY MANAGER KNEW NOTHING OF THIS. IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, A DEVELOPER IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PROPER NOTICE TO HOMEOWNERS, NOT AN HOA OR HOA MANAGEMENT COMPANY. AS I PREVIOUSLY STATED IN MEETINGS, I GUARANTEE I CAN FIND OUT WHAT EACH AND EVERY ONE EVERYONE'S ADDRESS IN THIS ROOM IS, AS THERE IS THIS TOOL CALLED THE INTERNET. ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS A COWARDLY RESPONSE AND EXCUSE FROM THE DEVELOPER. WE WANT TO CLARIFY HOW MAIL IS DELIVERED WITHIN ALL OF CASTLE HILLS. THE RESIDENTS NORTH OF PARKER GET THEIR MAIL DELIVERED FROM USPS TO CASTLE HILLS MAIL CENTER. THE MAIL CENTER THEN DELIVERS A MAIL DOOR TO DOOR TO THE INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTS. THE RESERVE RESIDENTS. THOSE OF US SOUTH OF PARKER GET OUR MAIL DELIVERED FROM USPS TO CASTLE HILLS MAIL CENTER. THE MAIL CENTER THEN DELIVERS DOOR TO DOOR TO OUR INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTS. THERE'S ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE. LASTLY, THE CASTLE HILLS MAIL SERVICE HAS FULL GATE ACCESS TO OUR COMMUNITY, JUST AS THEY DO WITH OTHER GATED COMMUNITIES WITHIN CASTLE HILLS. BECAUSE THIS BACKGROUND STATEMENT IS VERY MISLEADING, WE WOULD LIKE THIS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE BACKGROUND STORY. I'LL END ON THIS NOTE. THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT THAT YOU ADOPTED IN JANUARY OF 22 STATES

[01:10:02]

[01:15:05]

THE HUMAN IMPACT FOR 61 FAMILIES AND MULTIPLE RETAIL BUSINESSES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED, ALONG WITH THE LARGE FINANCIAL LIABILITY THAT WOULD COME WITH THIS, WHO WOULD BE FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING THE BUILDING IN ITS FOUNDATION? WHO WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST TO RELOCATE 61 FAMILIES WHO WOULD BE COMPENSATED THE RETAILERS FOR LOST REVENUE? WHO WOULD COVER THE COST OF RAILROAD REPAIRS? WHO WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NEW SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES.

FINANCIAL LIABILITY SHOULD BE AGREED IN WRITING PRIOR TO ANY APPROVAL TO BUILD ON THIS PROPERTY. TO PROTECT THE CITY BUILDING OCCUPANTS, RESIDENTS AND THE HOA. I WILL SHARE SOME INFORMATION ON TWO FAILURES WE HAVE ALREADY EXPERIENCED. I WOULD ASK YOU TO LOOK AT THIS INFORMATION NOT FOR THE HUMAN IMPACT IT HAD ON US, BUT FOR THE IMPACT IF IT HAPPENS ON THIS NEW LOT, THINK OF THE SAME THING HAPPENING THERE. SLIDE NUMBER FOUR. DURING A CASTLE HILLS WATER DISTRICT MEETING IN SEPTEMBER 2020, WHEN DISCUSSING THE MOST RECENT LANDSLIDE THAT WE HAD JUST EXPERIENCED, WE WERE MADE AWARE OF AN EARLIER LANDSLIDE ON THE SAME LOT THAT HAPPENED BACK IN 2008, A FORMER BRITE DEVELOPMENT EMPLOYEE SAID. DIRECT QUOTE FROM THE AUDIO RECORDING. WHEN I BUILT THE SLOPE, IT FAILED. IT FAILED BEFORE ANY HOMES WERE BUILT OR LOTS WERE SOLD. THERE WAS A DISCUSSION WITH THE DEVELOPER THAT THESE LOTS SHOULD NOT BE SOLD AND HOMES SHOULD NOT BE PUT ON THESE LOTS, UNQUOTE. SO THIS SOIL WAS A KNOWN PROBLEM. THE DEVELOPER BUILT THE HOMES, NO STRUCTURAL WALLS, NO WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM, NO STABILIZING PIERS ON THE HILL. WHAT IF THE SAME HAPPENS ON THE PROPOSED BUILD SITE? SLIDE FIVE. THIS IS A PICTURE OF THE MOST RECENT LANDSLIDE FROM JUNE OF 2020. 2 MILLION POUNDS OF SOIL SLID DOWN THE HILL, DAMAGING THREE HOMES AGAIN. PICTURE THE PROPOSED BUILD SITE WITH THE SAME ISSUE.

SLIDE SIX. THIS IS OUR HOME. OUR NEIGHBORS WAS SIMILAR AND APARTMENT RETAIL BUILDING WOULD BE UNINHABITABLE IF THIS HAPPENED. SLIDE SEVEN. UNDERGROUND WATER FLOWS WERE FOUND DURING THE REBUILD. MANY OF THE 74 PIER DRILLINGS TO STABILIZE THE HILL ALSO HIT WATER. UNDERGROUND. WATER FLOW IS INHERENT IN THIS AREA AND CAUSES SOIL INSTABILITY. SLIDE EIGHT. THIS SLIDE SHOWS THE REBUILD OF THE 2020 LANDSLIDE. FIVE MONTHS INTO THE PROJECT.

YOU DON'T FIX THESE THINGS IN TWO WEEKS. TOTAL TIME FROM SLIDE TO COMPLETION WAS NINE MONTHS.

WHERE ARE THE FAMILIES AND THE BUSINESSES GOING TO BE? TOTAL COST OF THE REPAIRS EXCEEDED $700,000, THE MAJORITY PAID FOR WITH CASTLE HILLS WATER DISTRICT TAX FUNDS. SLIDE NINE. ARE THERE ALREADY SIGNS OF SOIL ISSUES ON THE BUILD LOT? INTERESTING. I HAD A NEIGHBOR GIVE ME THE IMAGE THAT YOU SEE ON SLIDE NINE. THIS IS A GOOGLE EARTH IMAGE. THERE'S ALREADY A 40 FOOT BY 40 FOOT SLIDE TOWARDS THE RAIL LINE FROM THE SUBJECT LOT, SO IT MAY BE A WARNING SIGN OF EXTREME FAILURES TO FOLLOW. SLIDE TEN. IT TOOK 12 YEARS, BUT FINALLY, ON OUR PROPERTIES, A PROPER SOIL EVALUATION WAS DONE AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN COMPLETED. WILL THE DEVELOPER DO A GEOTECH SURVEY FOR THE NEW LOT? OF COURSE THEY WILL. YOU HAVE TO DO THAT. OKAY. IT WAS DONE ON OUR PROPERTIES OKAY. BUT OF COURSE OUR PROPERTY STILL FAILED. SO EITHER THE SURVEY WASN'T VERY ACCURATE OR THE RESULTS OF THE SURVEY AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS WERE NOT FOLLOWED. COUNSEL SHOULD ASSURE A PROPER SOIL EVALUATION IS COMPLETED WITH STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED AHEAD OF EVER ENTERTAINING APPROVAL, NOT 12 YEARS LATER. PLEASE DO NOT LET 61 FAMILIES AND MULTIPLE BUSINESSES EXPERIENCE WHAT WE HAVE EXPERIENCED JUST FOUR 400FT AWAY. NO ONE DID THE RIGHT THING BY LETTING US KNOW THESE PARTICULAR ABOUT THESE PARTICULAR FAILURES, AND WE CANNOT IN GOOD CONSCIENCE HAVE OTHERS BE UNINFORMED AS WE WERE.

MY FINAL POINT ONE OF THE QUESTIONS I WOULD HAVE ASKED MR. STANLEY IF WE HAD EVER HAD A

[01:20:01]

THERE IS NO PARK OR PLAYGROUND IN THE NEW CONCEPT PLAN FOR THIS LOT. SIMPLY NO ROOM. WHERE WILL THE CHILDREN OF 61 FAMILIES PLAY? THEY ARE LANDLOCKED BY HAZARDS, RAILROAD TRACKS, A WALL, INDIAN CREEK PARK ROAD. THERE ARE CHOICES TO PLAY ARE EITHER IN THE PARKING LOT, DOWN NEAR THE RAIL TRACKS, OR MAYBE INDIAN CREEK THAT BECOMES A RAGING RIVER WHEN IT RAINS, THEY WILL HAVE TO CROSS SIX LANES OF HIGH SPEED PARKER ROAD TRAFFIC TO FIND A PARK. EVEN WITH A TRAFFIC LIGHT, THIS IS A TRAGEDY WAITING TO HAPPEN. THE CITY HAS A GREAT STRATEGIC INITIATIVE ON TEN MINUTE WALK TO THE PARK, BUT I DOUBT IF THE SPIRIT OF THIS INITIATIVE INCLUDES KIDS WALKING ACROSS SIX LANES OF HIGH SPEED TRAFFIC. OUR CITY DESERVES DEVELOPERS THAT DO THINGS, DO THE RIGHT THINGS, AND DO THEM IN THE RIGHT WAY. COULD THIS PROJECT BE DONE? CERTAINLY.

WE'VE YES, WE'VE SEEN THE DEVELOPER'S UPDATED CONCEPT PLAN. SHOULD IT BE DONE? NO, NOT IN THE OPINION OF THE RESIDENTS, FOR ALL THE REASONS THAT WE'RE GOING TO COVER TONIGHT. WILL IT BE DONE? THAT'S UP TO YOU. YOU GET A VOTE. WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO PICK AMONGST THE MULTIPLE REASONS AND VOTE NO, THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. MR. RICK VARDELL. MR. RICK VARDELL. NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE SIR. THANK YOU. RICK VIDAL 2801 100 KNIGHTS DRIVE. PARDON ME WHILE I GETTING OLD. WE ALL KNOW THAT THIS HAS COME BEFORE BOTH THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL. THREE TIMES. IT'S BEEN OPPOSED THREE TIMES. AS MAYOR GILMORE HAS POINTED OUT, THE OPPOSITION IS UNANIMOUS, STRONG AND A LOT. THERE'S A LOT OF FOLKS HERE THAT ARE NOT HAPPY ABOUT THIS. I WOULD LIKE TO START OUT BY CLARIFYING A MISCONCEPTION. WE ARE NOW BEING TOLD THAT THE EXISTING CONCEPT PLAN WAS NEVER INTENDED TO PORTRAY EIGHT BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES. HOWEVER, AT THE AUGUST 6TH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. THE STAFF REFERRED TO THIS AS EIGHT GARDEN OFFICES, LIKELY 1 OR 2 STORIES. THE DEVELOPER HIMSELF SAID CURRENT CONCEPT PLAN CALLS FOR EIGHT STRUCTURES AND I WOULD LIKE TO.

PLAY A LITTLE SOUNDTRACK HERE. MR. MR. STANLEY, WE CAN'T HEAR YOU. YOU CAN? YES. OKAY. THE CURRENT CONCEPT PLAN CALLS CALLS FOR EIGHT STRUCTURES. AS WE'VE NOTED, JUST IN CASE THERE'S ANY DOUBT THAT OUR QUOTES HERE ARE NOT ACCURATE. AT THE AUGUST 19TH COUNCIL MEETING, THE STAFF MEMO SAID MAJOR CHANGE. THIS IS A MAJOR CHANGE BECAUSE BUILDINGS WERE BEING REMOVED AND SITE CIRCULATION PATTERNS WERE IMPACTED, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SAID. BUILDINGS OF THIS SIZE ON LOTS OF THIS SIZE ARE LIKELY TO BE 1 OR 2 STORIES. AT THE APRIL 15TH PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING AGAIN, THE STAFF MEMO SAID THIS IS A MAJOR CHANGE BECAUSE IT WAS MOVING BUILDINGS AND CHANGING SITE CIRCULATION, PLANNING STAFF SAID. THIS IS A CHANGE TO THE ORIGINAL PLAN TO A SINGLE BUILDING, AS OPPOSED TO 5 OR 6 SMALL BUILDINGS. AT THE MAY 5TH COUNCIL MEETING, STAFF MEMO AGAIN SAID THIS IS A MAJOR CHANGE BECAUSE WE'RE REMOVING BUILDINGS AND WE'RE CHANGING SITE CIRCULATION. HOWEVER, THIS ITEM WAS OR THIS MEETING AND THIS ITEM AT THIS MEETING WAS CONTINUED BY REQUEST OF THE DEVELOPER TO MAY 19TH. SO THERE WAS NO FURTHER DISCUSSION OTHER THAN THE STAFF MEMO. THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT PLAN WAS EIGHT STRUCTURES FOR GARDEN STYLE OFFICE RETAIL, AND THAT FACT HAS BEEN CONSISTENT FOR EIGHT MONTHS. THE TWO MEETINGS AND THE TWO CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS. SUDDENLY, AT THE MAY 19TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING, THE GARDEN STYLE OFFICE RETAIL SITES HAVE DISAPPEARED AND THE ONLY FACTOR UNDER CONSIDERATION WITH THE CONCEPT PLAN AMENDMENT IS THE INTERNAL SITE CIRCULATION. FOUR TIMES AT FOUR DIFFERENT MEETINGS, WE WERE LOOKING AT EIGHT SEPARATE BUILDING PADS OR STRUCTURES AND NOW THEY'RE GONE.

CITY PLANNING NEVER WAVERED THROUGH THE PAST EIGHT MONTHS, ALWAYS REFERRING TO EIGHT PAD SITES AND STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT PLAN. THE DEVELOPER AND THEIR ENGINEER HAVE NEVER REFUTED THOSE FACTS BASED ON THEIR COMMENTS AT PRIOR MEETINGS. AND NOW WE ARE BEING TOLD WE WERE ALL MISTAKEN. WHAT HAPPENED? HOW DID THIS CHANGE? WHO MADE THIS DECISION? HOW? ONE

[01:25:03]

IT'S ON THE LAST PAGE AND YOU CAN SEE WHERE THAT THE OLD ROADBED IS. NOW, THIS PROPERTY, WHEN THE NEW ROAD WAS CONSTRUCTED, THIS SLIVER OF LAND WAS LEFT OVER. THIS PROPERTY NEVER WAS PART OF THE REALM AND IS PHYSICALLY DIVORCED FROM THE REALM BY A SIX LANE DIVIDED THOROUGHFARE. I ARGUE THIS PROPERTY SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED PART OF THE REALM.

THE DEVELOPER'S OWN SALES BROCHURE FOR THE PROPERTY. AND IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS, I'VE GOT A COPY. I'D LIKE TO SHARE IT UP. THANK YOU SIR. THAT SALES BROCHURE SAYS THAT.

LET ME FIND IT HERE. THERE YOU GO. IT SAYS THAT THIS PROPERTY IS JUST SOUTH OF THE REALM, A ONE POINT 5,000,000 SQUARE FOOT MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS NOT THE PLACE FOR A HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURE. IN ADDITION TO THE STAFF MEMO. IN ADDITION, THE STAFF MEMO DESCRIBES THE PROPERTY AS FOLLOWS AND I QUOTE. THE SITE HAS SEVERAL DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES, INCLUDING AN ODD OR IRREGULAR SHAPE, FLOODPLAIN GRADE VARIATION, LIMITED ACCESS ON FM 544, LIMITED VISIBILITY, ADJACENCY TO RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY, AND AN 80 TO 120 FOOT ELECTRICAL EASEMENT. I COULDN'T HAVE DESCRIBED THAT ANY BETTER MYSELF, BUT LET'S NOT STOP THERE, SINCE THERE'S ONE MORE DESCRIPTION THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDED TO THIS LIST OF CHALLENGES. IT IS SURROUNDED BY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS, ALL OF THE EXISTING APARTMENT COMPLEXES IN CASTLE HILLS ARE BUILT ADJACENT TO A FREEWAY, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, ANOTHER APARTMENT BUILDING, A MAJOR POWER LINE EASEMENT, OR A MAJOR DRAINAGE AREA, ALL OF WHICH CREATE A NATURAL BUFFER. AS WAS POINTED OUT BY THE MCADAMS REPRESENTATIVE. THERE ARE A COUPLE OF EXCEPTIONS THERE. THE DIFFERENCE IS THOSE PLANNED OR THOSE PDS WERE NOT CHANGED. THE CONCEPT PLANS WERE IN PLACE, SO WHOEVER BOUGHT THOSE HOMES KNEW WHAT WAS THERE, OR THE HOMES WERE BEING BUILT CONCURRENTLY WITH THE APARTMENTS. SO THERE'S NO SURPRISES UNLIKE THIS SITUATION. YOUR P'S ARE PLANNING. ZONING COMMISSION COMMENTED WHILE DENYING THIS REQUEST TWICE, THAT A FIVE STORY MULTIFAMILY BUILDING ON THAT SITE DOES NOT BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY, AND THIS IS NOT A FIT FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD. IF YOU TRAVEL UP AND DOWN FM 544, YOU WILL NOT SEE ANY BUILDINGS OVER TWO STORIES. WHAT YOU WILL SEE IS SCHOOLS, SINGLE STORY RETAIL OR RESTAURANT BUILDINGS, COMMERCIAL BUSINESS BUILDINGS AND SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. THAT IS WHAT FITS IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. WE KNOW THAT BY RIGHT. GBH2 ZONING ALLOWS A FIVE STORY MULTIFAMILY BUILDING, BUT ONLY IF THE CONCEPT PLAN IS CHANGED AND APPROVED. WE ALSO KNOW GBH2 ALLOWS FOR A MULTITUDE OF OTHER USES, INCLUDING 1 OR 2 STORY OFFICE, RETAIL, PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS. THE TACTICS HERE OF A BULLY ALWAYS SEEMED TO FOLLOW THE MONEY TRAIL, AS DEMONSTRATED WHEN THE DEVELOPER STATED AT THE AUGUST PNC MEETING THAT HE WOULD MAKE THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THAT REAL ESTATE. WHAT THAT MEANS IS HE'S GOING TO GO AFTER THE HIGHEST PRICE, AND IN HIS OPINION, THAT'S THE BEST USE. WE BOUGHT OUR HOME THREE YEARS AGO, KNOWING THE PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY BEHIND US WAS FOR SALE. IF YOU LOOK AT SOME OF THE PICTURES, OUR HOME IS IN THOSE PICTURES. WE LOOKED INTO IT AND WERE TOLD IT WAS BEING MARKETED AS RETAIL AS THE SIGN ON THE PROPERTY SAID, AND STILL DOES TO THIS DAY. WE CLOSED ON THE PURCHASE FEELING SAFE THAT IT WAS SOMETHING WE COULD EASILY LIVE WITH. NOW WE'RE FACING A FIVE STORY APARTMENT BUILDING BEING MARKETED BY AN UNSCRUPULOUS DEVELOPER TRYING TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF A LOOPHOLE IN A DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THEIR OWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN WAS ADOPTED TO ENSURE THAT ZONING AND CASTLE HILLS WAS TAILORED TO MATCH EXISTING DEVELOPMENT, AND THAT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IS COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT. THIS APARTMENT BUILDING IN THIS LOCATION WOULD BE NEITHER COMPATIBLE NOR CONSISTENT WITH EXISTING

[01:30:05]

IT'S NEVER A WRONG TIME TO DO THE RIGHT THING. AND NOW IS THE TIME TO DO THE RIGHT THING FOR THE COMMUNITY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. MR. GEORGE SMILEY. MISS SMILEY, IF I CAN GET YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. GEORGE SMILEY, 401 CROWN OF GOLD. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS, FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE. TONIGHT. I'M GOING TO TALK ABOUT A FEW ITEMS THAT, IN MY OPINION, NEED TO BE STATED, RESTATED, OR QUESTIONS ASKED AND ANSWERS RECEIVED IN ORDER TO CLARIFY FOR ALL PARTIES. BUT FIRST, I'D LIKE TO TAKE A MOMENT TO ASK EVERYONE IN THIS CHAMBER AUDIENCE, IF YOU'RE HERE TONIGHT, IN OPPOSITION OF THE DEVELOPER'S REQUEST TO BUILD A FIVE STORY MIXED USE BUILDING ON THIS THREE AND A HALF ACRES, PLEASE STAND. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. YOU MAY BE SEATED. COUNCIL. AS YOU CAN SEE, WE REMAIN STEADFAST IN OUR OPPOSITION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. THIS DEVELOPMENT IS NOT COMPATIBLE NOR CONSISTENT WITH THE GUIDELINES OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT. ONE ITEM OF IMPORTANCE THAT EVERYONE ON THE COUNCIL NEEDS TO ALWAYS KEEP IN THEIR MIND IS THAT THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD DOCUMENT THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED ON JANUARY 3RD, 2022, IT INCORPORATED ALL PROVISIONS OF THE CASTLE HILLS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, ALONG WITH VARIANCES TO THE AGREEMENT APPROVED SINCE 1996. THE PD WAS ADOPTED TO ENSURE THAT ZONING IN CASTLE HILLS WAS TAILORED TO MATCH EXISTING DEVELOPMENT, AND THAT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IS COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH EXISTING DEVELOPMENT. THIS DOCUMENT IS VERY IMPORTANT AND GIVES ALL PARTIES GUIDELINES TO OPERATE WITHIN. IT MUST BE FOLLOWED AND ADHERED TO. BELOW ARE SOME ITEMS THAT WE FOUND WHEN REVIEWING THE AGENDA FOR TODAY'S MEETING ONE. THE ONLY FACTOR UNDER CONSIDERATION WITH THIS CONCEPT PLAN AMENDMENT IS THE INTERNAL SITE CIRCULATION. BUT I ASK, HOW CAN YOU APPROVE A SITE CIRCULATION PLAN WHEN YOU HAVEN'T EVEN APPROVED A CONCEPT? PLAN TWO WE ARE BEING TOLD THAT UPON ANNEXATION, THE CITY HAD 60 DAYS TO ADOPT A PERMANENT ZONING FOR THE AREA, AND THAT REQUIRED A CONCEPT PLAN BE ATTACHED. THE APPLICANT DID PROVIDE A CONCEPT PLAN AND IT WAS ATTACHED TO THE PD. THAT CONCEPT PLAN REFLECTED EIGHT PAD SITES. CONCEPT PLANS PLAY KEY ROLES IN DEVELOPMENT, AND I'D LIKE TO QUOTE MR. LUEDKE BACK IN THE AUGUST 2024 CITY COUNCIL MEETING, HE STATED, CONCEPT PLANS ARE VERY IMPORTANT. THEY ARE JUST AS IMPORTANT AS BASE ZONING CONCEPT PLANS COMPLEMENT BASE ZONING BY BRINGING INTO FOCUS THE LOCATION OF BUILDINGS, STREETS, AND OTHER AREAS. OTHER ACCESS WAYS. I WOULD ALSO ADD TO MR. LUCKY'S COMMENT THAT CONCEPT PLANS ALSO PROVIDE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS AND BUSINESSES INFORMATION ON WHAT THE FUTURE WILL LOOK LIKE, SO THAT PEOPLE ARE ABLE TO MAKE WELL-INFORMED DECISIONS ABOUT WHERE THEY WANT TO LIVE OR WHERE THEY WANT TO BUILD THEIR BUSINESSES. SO IT'S NOT RIGHT THAT THE APPLICANT CAN JUST CHANGE IT WHENEVER THEY WANT TO, WITHOUT ANY REGARD TO THE RAMIFICATIONS TO THOSE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS OR BUSINESSES. SO IN OUR SITUATION HERE, THE APPLICANT CREATED A CONCEPT PLAN THAT WAS ATTACHED TO THE PD THAT WAS ADOPTED IN JANUARY 2022. THE APPLICANT DISCOVERS THAT WHAT THEY'VE CREATED, HE CAN'T BUILD ON BECAUSE OF EASEMENTS. APPLICANT IS NOW ATTEMPTING TO CONVINCE EVERYONE THAT WE ARE ALL CRAZY, AND THAT ALL THE MANY DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT PLAN REFLECTING EIGHT BUILDINGS, IS NOW TOTALLY DIFFERENT THAN WHAT HAS EVER BEEN DISCUSSED. SO HE NEEDS US ALL TO BELIEVE THAT WE ARE CRAZY, AND THAT IT WAS NEVER HIS INTENTION TO BUILD MULTIPLE

[01:35:02]

THIS OFTEN INCLUDES PROJECTS THAT COULD ALTER THE LANDSCAPE, CHANGE LAND USE, OR IMPACT THE ESTHETIC APPEARANCE OF THE ENVIRONMENT. WE BELIEVE THIS IS DEFINITELY A SITUATION WHERE THIS SHOULD BE MANDATORY BEFORE ANY YES VOTES ARE GIVEN, BUT I DO GO BACK TO THE INITIAL FACTS OF THIS CASE. HOW CAN YOU VOTE ON A SITE CIRCULATION MATTER, WHICH IS WHAT'S ON THE TABLE FOR A VOTE WHEN THE PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN CHANGE FROM EIGHT PAD SITES TO A SINGLE MULTI-STORY MIXED USE BUILDING HAS NEVER BEEN APPROVED. TO OUR KNOWLEDGE. IF WE FOLLOW THE PDF DOCUMENT THAT WAS ADOPTED IN JANUARY 22ND, THAT DOCUMENT STATES SPECIFICALLY THAT FUTURE

[01:40:03]

MY NAME IS PHIL SMILEY. I'M AT 401 CROWN OF GOLD. I MAY NOT BE AS ELOQUENT AS SOME OF THESE OTHER SPEAKERS, SO BEAR WITH ME. BUT MR. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK. IF I MAY, I'D LIKE TO HAND YOU GIVE YOU SOME SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS THAT YOU CAN DISTRIBUTE, MR. MAYOR, THAT WILL SUPPORT WHAT I'M GOING TO TALK ABOUT. THANK YOU SIR.

AS I SHARE WITH YOU AND THE COUNCIL MEETING ON MAY 19TH, A LITTLE OVER 13 MONTHS AGO, I WAS ELECTED TO SERVE ON THE RESERVE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION BOARD, AND JUST THIS PAST APRIL WAS APPOINTED AS PRESIDENT. ALSO IN THAT LAST MEETING, I EMPHASIZED YOU THE LEVEL OF DISTRUST OUR RESIDENTS IN THE RESERVE COMMUNITY HAVE FOR THE APPLICANT, A DISTRUST BROUGHT ABOUT, IN MY OPINION, BY A LACK OF INTEGRITY. OUR PASSION THAT OUR COMMUNITY HAS CAN EASILY BE TRACED BACK TO WHEN TONIGHT'S TOPIC FIRST AROSE, LAST SUMMER. TWO WEEKS AGO, I RECAPPED FOR YOU A COUPLE OF ITEMS THAT OCCURRED IN THE AUGUST 2024 COUNCIL MEETING. I SHARED WITH YOU THE EXAMPLE WHERE MR. STANLEY, REPRESENTING BRISCOE LAND LLC, ATTEMPTED TO SEPARATE HIMSELF FROM MANY FROM THE MANY TENTACLES OF THE BRIGHT ORGANIZATION. AND IF YOU DO A REVIEW OF THE TEXAS COMPTROLLER RECORDS SO YOU CAN SEE FOR YOURSELF, THAT'S VERY MISLEADING. MR. STANLEY SERVES AS AN OFFICER OF MANY COMPANIES, SOME OF WHICH AFFECT OUR RESIDENTS PERSONALLY. ONE SUCH RESIDENT, ONE SUCH ORGANIZATION IS THE CASTLE HILLS MASTER ASSOCIATION. CASTLE HILLS. PLEASE COUNSEL, PLEASE NOTE THAT IN MY PRESENTATION I MAY REFER TO THE DEVELOPER, THE APPLICANT, OR KEMA, THAT MR. STANLEY IS INVOLVED IN ALL OF THESE. ALSO IN THAT AUGUST MEETING, YOU LEARNED THAT THE APPLICANT HAS NOT COMMUNICATED ANYTHING TO OUR COMMUNITY. IT WAS NOT FOR IF IT WAS NOT FOR A VERY OBSERVANT RESIDENT IN OUR COMMUNITY.

SEEING THE POSTING ON THE PROPERTY LAST SUMMER, WE WOULD HAVE KNOWN NOTHING. SPEAKING OF NO COMMUNICATION, IF I MAY, I'D ALSO LIKE TO RECAP SOME OF THE COMMENTS THAT WERE MADE IN THE AUGUST 2024 COUNCIL MEETING. COUNCIL MEMBER CADE TO MR. STANLEY. THERE IS A TOTAL LACK OF COMMUNICATION AND PASSING OUT BUSINESS CARDS DOESN'T CUT IT. THERE NEEDS TO BE DISCUSSIONS.

THERE NEEDS TO BE COMPROMISES. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT SHOULD NOT BE SHOVED DOWN A NEIGHBOR'S THROAT. COUNCIL MEMBER JONES. MR. STANLEY, YOU HAVE TO TAKE SOME TIME TO TALK TO THE RESIDENTS TO SEE WHAT'S ACCEPTABLE. BY RIGHTS, YOU CAN DO SOME THINGS, BUT BEING A GOOD NEIGHBOR IS IMPORTANT. WHILE MR. STANLEY ACKNOWLEDGED WHAT YOU SAID, HE SAID HE'D BE HAPPY TO SET UP A MEETING WITH THESE NEIGHBORS LIKE OTHER NEIGHBORS. BUT HE ALSO SAID, I DON'T KNOW WHAT I GIVE HERE. THAT COMMENT CLEARLY SHOWS HIS UNWILLINGNESS AT WORKING WITH US TO COMING TO A COMPROMISE. AS OF TODAY, THE APPLICANT STILL HAS NEVER MET WITH THE RESIDENTS OF THE RESERVE COUNCIL. IN MY OPINION, THE APPLICANT HAS BLATANTLY DISREGARDED COUNCIL'S DIRECTION TO MEET WITH OUR COMMUNITY. AS A FORMER BUSINESS OWNER. IF THIS PERSON WAS MY EMPLOYEE, HE WOULD NOW BE MY EX EMPLOYEE. IT'S HARD TO BELIEVE THAT THIS PROPOSAL IS EVEN ON THE AGENDA FOR TONIGHT.

IF THIS APPLICANT, IF THIS APPLICANT CAN BLATANTLY DISREGARD YOUR REQUEST, WHAT ELSE CAN THEY BLATANTLY DISREGARD? IF THIS DEVELOPMENT IS ALLOWED TO PROCEED? HONESTY AND INTEGRITY MATTER. ALSO, IN THE MAY 19TH COUNCIL MEETING, I HELPED PUT CONTEXT INTO ANOTHER REASON OUR RESIDENTS DO NOT TRUST THE APPLICANT AND THIS CENTERS UPON THE CURRENT SITUATION THEY ARE HAVING TO DEAL WITH WITH THEM REGARDING THE TOTAL DISREGARD OF THEIR LEGAL REQUIREMENT TO PRESERVE AND IMPROVE LOT 16 X BLOCK A WITHIN THE RESERVE COMMUNITY.

THIS LOT AND BLOCK IS KNOWN AS THE RESERVE LAKE PARK OR BOOT PARK. OUR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WERE DEVELOPED AND EXECUTED BY THIS APPLICANT. BOOT PARK WAS MARKETED AS AN AMENITY TO OUR COMMUNITY. RESIDENTS WHO PURCHASE HOMES, THEN BACK THAT BACK UP ONTO BOOT PARK, PAID

[01:45:03]

[01:50:01]

IF ANYONE FROM MCADAMS OR MR. STANLEY WOULD LIKE TO SAY ANY FURTHER WORDS, I'LL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WELL, IF THERE'S NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE, I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN IT UP TO COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM THE CLOSE, THE PUBLIC HEARING FIRST, OR IF YOU WANT TO ASK MR. STANLEY QUESTIONS, I WOULD IMAGINE WE NEED TO KEEP THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. NO, I JUST HAVE TO SAY, OKAY, CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL RIGHT. LET'S HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND? I HAVE A MOTION A SECOND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. COUNCIL. PLEASE VOTE. ALL RIGHT. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. I HAVE TWO QUICK COMMENTS. YOU ALL ARE MORE THAN WELCOME TO STAY AND PARTICIPATE IN THE REST OF THE COUNCIL MEETING. WE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE YOU HERE ALL THE TIME. SO. BUT WITH THAT REGARD, I DO APPRECIATE THE COMMENT AND WHAT WAS MEANT THERE. I ALSO WANT TO THANK MR. TOM ROACH FOR ADDING THE WORD BEEF IN THE MODERN DEFINITION TO OUR COUNCIL MEETING. SO APPRECIATE THAT ONE.

IT WILL GO DOWN IN HISTORY WITH THAT COUNCIL. I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THIS UP FOR ANY COUNCIL COMMENTS OR OR A MOTION. I HAVE. DO YOU WANT TO SAY SOMETHING? I'LL CHECK THE OKAY. SO THANK YOU FOR THANK YOU EVERYBODY FOR COMING. REALLY APPRECIATE IT. I'M ALSO I'M VERY, VERY HUMBLED TO HEAR EVERYBODY'S. OPINIONS AND INPUT INTO THIS PROCESS. I HAVE SAT HERE QUIETLY FOR QUITE A FEW MEETINGS, AND I HAVE GOT A LOT OF THINGS I'D LIKE TO SAY, SO PLEASE BEAR WITH ME, I DID. I WANT TO START OUT BY SAYING KIND OF WHERE WHERE I'M COMING FROM AND ALL OF THIS I AM. I'M A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER, AND MY CAREER IS IN LAND PLANNING AND LAND ENTITLEMENT. SO, YOU KNOW, I'M I'M LOOKING FOR THE TECHNICALITIES HERE, AND I'M TRYING TO GET MY ARMS AROUND WHAT EXACTLY WE ARE CONSIDERING AND WHAT WE'RE NOT CONSIDERING.

I KNOW FOR A FACT WE ARE NOT CONSIDERING ZONING. I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT WE ARE NOT CONSIDERING HEIGHT, AND THAT ALTHOUGH I WOULD SAY THE HEIGHT IS NOT UNLIMITED, THAT'S YOUR HEIGHT IS LIMITED BY HOW MUCH PARKING YOU CAN GET ON THE PROPERTY. BUT THERE IS THERE IS A COMMENT IN THE BACKUP THAT I JUST WANTED TO QUOTE. IT SAYS THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS TRIGGERING A PUBLIC HEARING SOLELY DUE TO THE RELOCATION OF A CIRCULATION DRIVE. I'M HAVING A HARD TIME WITH THAT, AND MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE SITUATION DOESN'T NECESSARILY ALIGN WITH THAT LOGIC. AND BECAUSE I BELIEVE BASED ON MY EXPERIENCE AND, YOU KNOW, DOING THIS JOB, LAND PLANNING, PUTTING TOGETHER PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS MYSELF, THAT THIS CONCEPT PLAN SETS A FORM FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. AND IT IS MY BELIEF THAT THE FORM OF THIS DEVELOPMENT, OR THE INTENTION OF WHAT THIS WAS GOING TO BE, HAS FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGED. AND I'LL EXPLAIN WHY.

SO IN THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT PLAN, THERE ARE SEVERAL PARCELS THAT ARE LEFT BLANK. THIS PARCEL WAS NOT LEFT BLANK. IT HAD LOT LINES ON IT. AND TO ME THAT IMPLIES THAT THERE WAS A PLAN FOR THIS PROPERTY AT THE TIME THAT THIS CONCEPT PLAN WAS PUT TOGETHER. AT THE TIME, WE HAD PUBLIC HEARINGS TO ADDRESS THAT. THERE WAS A PLAN FOR THIS SITE. AND SO IF THERE WASN'T, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN LEFT BLANK. THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT PLAN, IN ALIGNMENT WITH THERE WAS A PLAN FOR THIS. IT SHOWS A SUBDIVISION OF THIS SITE INTO EIGHT SMALLER LOTS. NOW I'VE PUT TOGETHER A WHOLE LOT OF CONCEPT PLANS. I HAVE NEVER WITH THE INTENTION OF BUILDING ONE BUILDING SUBDIVIDED A LOT INTO

[01:55:01]

SO I'M GOING TO DISAGREE WITH STAFF THAT THIS IS JUST ABOUT A CIRCULATION DRIVE. ALL OF THOSE THINGS TOGETHER PROJECT, IN MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION, AN INTENTION TO THE NEIGHBORS, A TRIGGER OR A SIGNAL TO THE NEIGHBORS THAT SAYS THIS IS GOING TO BE A LOWER PROFILE BUILDING. IN OTHER WORDS, YOU DON'T NEED TO BE WORRIED ABOUT IT. SO AND I'D ALSO LIKE TO REFERENCE IN THE, IN THE PD ITSELF, IN THE LANGUAGE IN SECTION FIVE, THE REALM SUBDISTRICT. SECTION C TWO, WHICH IS AMENDMENTS TO THE CONCEPT PLAN THAT THIS IT STATES MAJOR MODIFICATIONS SUCH AS THE ADDITION OR REMOVAL OF BUILDINGS AND CHANGES TO THE SITE CIRCULATION PATTERN THAT IMPACTS CONNECTIVITY WITHIN THE SITE INTO SURROUNDING VELOPMENT SHALL BE AMENDED THROUGH THE REZONING PROCESS SET FORTH IN THE CITY OF LEWISVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE. SO IF I'M GOING TO BUY THE ARGUMENT THAT THE CONCEPT PLAN SHOWS NO BUILDINGS. OKAY, WELL THEN ONE BUILDING BEING ADDED MEANS THAT THIS IS A MAJOR MODIFICATION. SO THAT, IN MY OPINION, IS WHY WE'RE HERE, WHY THIS PUBLIC HEARING IS HAPPENING. I ALSO WANT TO MENTION THAT YES, WE DO HAVE A PLAT THAT WAS APPROVED BACK IN JUNE OF 2022, BUT A PLAT IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING. IT DID NOT COME TO COUNCIL, AND IT IS NOT A MECHANISM THAT SHOULD BE USED TO CIRCUMVENT A PUBLIC HEARING. AND IT SHOULD ALSO NOT BE USED TO INSINUATE THAT WE SOMEHOW HAVE TO APPROVE THIS. BECAUSE THE PLAT WAS APPROVED. THEY ARE TWO SEPARATE PROCESSES. SO I IN CLOSING, I WILL SAY I DISAGREE WITH THE ASSERTION THAT THIS IS JUST ABOUT SITE CIRCULATION. I AGAIN BELIEVE THAT THE FORM OF THE DEVELOPMENT HAS SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGED, AND I HAVE JUST TWO THINGS THAT I WANT TO LEAVE THAT I'M UNCOMFORTABLE WITH RIGHT NOW. ONE IS IF WE ARE JUST CONSIDERING THE SITE CIRCULATION, WHICH I DISAGREE, THAT WE'RE NOT JUST CONSIDERING SITE CIRCULATION, BUT IF WE WERE, I HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT THE SITE CIRCULATION THAT THAT FIRE LANE IS IN THE THAT OVERLAPS INTO THAT ENCORE EASEMENT. IT IS

[02:00:09]

[02:05:10]

[D. Visitors Forum]

OTHERS SIMPLY DON'T HAVE THE TIME, TRANSPORTATION, OR RESOURCES TO CARRY IT OUT THEMSELVES. AND SOME ASSUME THAT RESCUE GROUPS WILL TAKE CARE OF IT ALL. AND THAT'S WHY BETTER

[02:10:07]

AFTER ALL, WE ARE ALL VOLUNTEERS AND UNFORTUNATELY, FERAL CATS DON'T PAY OUR BILLS. BUT WHAT'S MISSING IS CITY SUPPORT. RIGHT NOW, THERE IS NO INFORMATION ABOUT TNR ON THE CITY'S SHELTER'S WEBSITE. THERE IS NO GUIDANCE FOR RESIDENTS WHO FEED OUTDOOR CATS. THERE IS NO CLEAR PARTNERSHIPS WITH THE PEOPLE ALREADY DOING THE WORK. WE'RE ASKING FOR SIMPLE, REALISTIC CHANGES THAT CAN MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE. EXCUSE ME. ONE IS THAT INFORMATION ABOUT TNR AND LOCAL RESCUES SO THAT WE ARE THAT WE ARE ALREADY USING LIKE TEACUP IN DENTON AND SPAY AND NEUTER SOCIETY RIGHT HERE IN LEWISVILLE TO THE SHELTER'S WEBSITE. NUMBER TWO IS HELP PROMOTE SAFE TRAP LOANS WITH BASIC EDUCATION OR MENTORSHIPS OR EXCUSE ME OR MENTORSHIP REQUIREMENTS. AND NUMBER THREE IS SUPPORT POLICIES THAT ENCOURAGE ACCOUNTABILITY. FOR EXAMPLE, REQUIRING FEEDERS TO FIX AND VACCINATE THE CATS THEY CARE FOR WITH SUPPORT TO MAKE THAT POSSIBLE. WE KNOW THAT TNR WORKS. THE VISIBLE DIFFERENCE IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD ALONE PROVES THAT WE'VE GONE FROM CHAOS TO CONTROL, AND NOW WE'RE HELPING OTHERS DO THE SAME. BUT WE CAN'T KEEP DOING THIS ALONE. A PARTNERSHIP WITH THE CITY, WHETHER THAT THROUGH EDUCATION, INFRASTRUCTURE OR GRANT SUPPORT, WOULD MAKE A TREMENDOUS DIFFERENCE TO US. IF YOU'RE UNSURE HOW URGENT THIS ISSUE IS, I INVITE YOU TO DRIVE THROUGH THE TANGLEWOOD SUBDIVISION, WHICH IS JUST A HALF A MILE DOWN THE ROAD. EXCUSE ME? WHILE THE MAJORITY OF CATS ARE NOW FIXED IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, IT STILL REFLECTS THE SCALE OF THE PROBLEM. EVEN AFTER MORE THAN A YEAR OF HARD WORK. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, AND I TRULY LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING TOGETHER TO FIND SOLUTIONS THAT BENEFIT OUR COMMUNITY AND THE ANIMALS THAT LIVE IN IT. THANK YOU. AMY TURNER. ALL RIGHT. MY NAME IS AMY TURNER, AND I'M THE MEDICAL VOLUNTEER FOR RESCUE ME. AND CAN I GET YOUR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE? 4608 OAK SPRINGS DRIVE. AND I'M ACTUALLY IN FLOWER MOUND. BUT OUR RESCUE SERVES LEWISVILLE AND THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY. COULD I ASK TO STAND THE FOLKS THAT ARE HERE IN SUPPORT OF WHAT WE CAME FOR TONIGHT? WE'RE NOT AS BIG AS THE LAST CROWD, BUT WE'RE HARD WORKING. SO OUR CAT RESCUE SERVES THE LEWISVILLE AREA, THE SURROUNDING AREAS HIGHLAND VILLAGE, LANTANA, FLOWER MOUND, CARROLLTON, SO FORTH. OUR PRIMARY ROLE AND KIND OF WHEN MOST OF US GOT STARTED, WAS TO ADOPT OUT KITTENS AND CATS AS PETS. BUT IN THE COURSE OF FILLING THAT ROLE, IT'S COME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT IF WE JUST ADOPT OUT KITTENS AND CATS AS PETS, WE ARE NOT SOLVING THE FERAL CAT PROBLEM THAT SEEMS TO BE WORSE IN LEWISVILLE. MOST OF OUR CALLS COME FROM LEWISVILLE. ADULT CATS ARE HAVING THREE OR EVEN FOUR LITTERS OF KITTENS PER YEAR. I FEEL LIKE MOST PEOPLE DON'T KNOW THAT EACH OF THOSE LITTERS MIGHT BE ANYWHERE FROM 1 TO 10 KITTENS, AND THOSE KITTENS ARE BREEDING AS YOUNG AS FOUR MONTHS OF AGE, SO WE WILL NEVER, EVER BE ABLE TO ADOPT KITTENS AND GET LEWISVILLE OUT OF THE FERAL CAT PROBLEM. SO WHAT WE'RE HERE TO ADVOCATE FOR IS THE NEED FOR TNR, WHICH IS THE SAFE AND HUMANE TRAPPING, NEUTERING, AND RETURN OF FERAL OR WILD CATS TO THEIR OUTDOOR HOME. SO TO BACK UP A LITTLE BIT, IN CASE YOU'RE NOT FAMILIAR, FERAL CATS ARE NOT ADOPTABLE PETS. A FERAL CAT IS A CAT THAT IS UNTOUCHABLE BY HUMANS. IT'S OFTEN NOT SEEN. THEY COME OUT TO HUNT AND MATE AFTER DARK. LEWISVILLE IS COVERED OVER WITH THE ISSUE. DRIVE DOWN THE STREET OR ANYWHERE AROUND LEWISVILLE HIGH SCHOOL. YOU'LL SEE THE ISSUE. CHECK THE COMMUNITY FACEBOOK PAGE. YOU'LL SEE THAT PEOPLE ARE POSTING. I FOUND KITTENS IN MY CAR UNDER MY SHED. OH MY GOSH, ALL OVER THE PLACE, RIGHT? SO THE PROBLEM IS PERVASIVE. WHY ARE THESE CATS SO PREVALENT TO LEWISVILLE? I THINK I SEE THREE BIG REASONS. ONE IS THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE JUST AREN'T AWARE THAT THEY'RE HERE. BUT PEOPLE ARE. THEY'RE AWARE OR THEY ARE AWARE THAT THEY'RE HERE. SO THEY'RE FEEDING THEM, WHICH IS COMPASSIONATE, BUT THEY'RE INADVERTENTLY ADDING TO THE OVERPOPULATION PROBLEM. ANOTHER REASON IS THAT THERE'S NO PROGRAM IN PLACE TO CURB THE REPRODUCTION OF FERAL CATS. AND THEN ANOTHER BIG REASON I SEE IS THAT THOSE SAME PEOPLE, THEY MAY NOT KNOW THAT FIXING THE CAT IS IMPORTANT, BUT EVEN IF THEY DO KNOW THAT IT'S IMPORTANT, THEY DON'T KNOW HOW THEY LACK THE TIME TO DO IT, OR THEY LACK THE FUNDS TO DO IT. SO THEY KEEP FEEDING, AND FEEDING IS BREEDING. SO WHAT ARE THE BARRIERS TO GETTING ALL THESE CATS FIXED? WELL, T CAP IS OUR USUAL GO TO IN DENTON COUNTY. IT'S TEXAS COALITION FOR ANIMAL PROTECTION. THEY'RE UP IN DENTON. BUT IN ORDER TO TAKE A FERAL CAT THERE TO FIX IT, YOU

[02:15:02]

THERE'S AN ADOPTION FEE AND THAT OFFSETS OUR COSTS. THESE CATS HAVE NO OWNER. THERE'S NO ADOPTION FEE, NO ADOPTER, NO OWNER. NO ONE CAN BE BILLED FOR THEIR CARE. SO IT'S A PUBLIC SERVICE THAT RIGHT NOW OUR RESCUE IS PAYING FOR. BUT I FEEL LIKE THERE'S TAXPAYERS IN THE CITY OF LEWISVILLE THAT WOULD LIKE TO NOT HAVE FERAL CATS RUNNING AROUND THEIR YARD, AND THEY'RE PAYING TAXES TO THE CITY OF LEWISVILLE. SO I'D RATHER WORK IN A PARTNERSHIP. NOBODY'S REIMBURSING US. WE'RE DOING IT AS VOLUNTEERS BECAUSE IT'S THE RIGHT THING TO DO. BUT TO MATH IT OUT. LET'S SAY WE FIX 200 CATS WITH A CONSERVATIVE COST OF $50 PER CAT. SOMETIMES IT'S MORE EVEN. SO, 200 TIMES 50 IS $10,000. THAT'S A COST WE'D LIKE SOME HELP WITH. WE'RE HAPPY TO DO THE WORK, BUT WE'D LIKE TO DO THE WORK IN PARTNERSHIP AND NOT ON OUR OWN SHOULDERS. NOW, I CAN PERSONALLY UNDERSTAND THE CITY MAY LACK THE RESOURCES TO MANAGE TNR. WELL, I WILL SAY I DISAGREE A LITTLE BIT WITH THAT BECAUSE I SEE THAT OTHER CITIES ARE DOING IT. ARLINGTON'S EXPANDING THEIR TNR. DALLAS HAS A PROGRAM. MESQUITE HAS A PROGRAM WHERE THEY CERTIFY RESIDENTS TO DO TNR. WATAUGA JUST LAUNCHED A FANTASTIC PROGRAM. THEY'VE GOT INFO ON THEIR WEBSITE, WHICH I BROUGHT AN EXAMPLE OF. SO A POSSIBLE SOLUTION MIGHT BE TO OFFER GRANT MONEY TO THE RESCUES IN THE AREA THAT ARE DOING THE JOB. WE'RE DOING THE JOB. THERE'S ANOTHER RESCUE CALLED DALLAS CAT LADY. THEY'RE DOING A LOT OF THE JOB. IT'D BE NICE IF WE COULD GET SOME HELP. SO I KNOW THAT IF LEWISVILLE GOT A STAFF MEMBER INVOLVED TO DO TNR, FOR EXAMPLE, YOU'D HAVE SOMEBODY'S SALARY TO PAY, RIGHT? WE'RE ASKING FOR $10,000 TO FIX 200 CATS. THAT'S A LOT SMALLER THAN SOMEBODY'S SALARY. AND THE DATA IS ALREADY THERE. THE SHELTER NUMBERS ARE ACTUALLY DOWN THIS YEAR BECAUSE OF THE WORK WE'VE BEEN DOING, BUT THERE'S A LOT MORE WORK TO BE DONE. ANOTHER PROPOSAL MIGHT BE TO OFFER A DAY OF THE WEEK WHERE A VET IS PRESIDENT, PRESENT AT THE LEWISVILLE SHELTER TO PROVIDE SPAY AND NEUTER. SO THE VETS ALREADY THERE, LET'S JUST SAY FOR THE SHELTER PETS. WELL, THAT VET IS PAID BY THE DAY, NOT BY THE PET. SO WHY NOT MAX OUT THEIR SURGERY SCHEDULE AND SERVE FERAL AND UNOWNED COMMUNITY CATS ON THOSE SAME DAYS? THE COST TO THE CITY WOULD BE NOMINAL, SINCE THE VET'S ALREADY THERE AND THEY'RE PAID BY THE DAY. ALSO, IT WOULD BE REALLY OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THAT'S THE LAST OF THE

[E. Consent Agenda]

WHAT HAPPENED? THERE WE GO. I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. ALL RIGHT, NEXT UP, I HAVE A REQUEST BY OUR CITY ATTORNEY TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION. THIS IS FOR SECTION 551 .07 FOR PERSONNEL. CITY SECRETARY, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER APPOINTING A CITY SECRETARY AND ALL MATTERS INCIDENT AND RELATED THERETO. WE WILL MOVE INTO CLOSED ALSO GO IN UNDER 7105 51.071 CONSULTATION WITH SIR I DON'T. ALL RIGHT COUNCIL I'LL WE ARE BACK IN A REGULAR SESSION I WILL. MOVE INTO ITEM F

[F. Regular Hearing]

[02:20:01]

AND I'VE GOT A SECOND COUNCIL, IF YOU WOULD PLEASE VOTE. ALL RIGHT. MOTION PASSES

[G. Reports]

WE'LL GO TO MY LEFT. COUNCILMEMBER CADE WHO? NO REPORT. OKAY. COUNCIL MEMBER JONES, NO REPORT. COUNCIL MEMBER. GREEN. NADA. COUNCILMEMBER KELLY LAKE LEVEL IS 100%. YOU WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT'S OUT THERE? PERFECT. THANK YOU. I WAS GOING TO ASK I WAS GOING TO ASK. SO TAD, ANYTHING SINCE YOU'RE YOU'RE HOLDING UP THAT END OF THE STREET. OKAY.

CITY SECRETARY, CITY ATTORNEY. ALL RIGHT WITH THAT, FOLKS, WE DO HAVE EARLY VOTING ON THE RUNOFF, SO PLEASE CONSIDER DOING YOUR CIVIC DUTY. YOU CAN FIND THAT ON THE CITY WEB PAGE. WE ALSO HAVE OUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE SEMIANNUAL REPORT AVAILABLE IN THE COUNCIL PACKET. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS LET ME KNOW. WE HAVE ANY OTHER CLOSED SESSION.

ARE YOU SURE WE'RE GOOD? OKAY. AS THERE IS NO FURTHER ACTION BE TAKEN ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, WE STAND ADJOURNED. AUDIENCE. GREAT JOB

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.