[A. Call to Order and Announce that a Quorum is Present.]
[00:00:05]
>>> IT IS 6:30 P.M. AND I CALL TO ORDER TUESDAY, JULY 7TH, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
[B. Approval of Minutes]
THERE IS A QUORUM PRESENT. FIRST ITEM OF BUSINESS IS APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR JUNL TO MEETING.>> MOTION BY EARN, SECOND BY JACK.
MOTION CARRIES, 7-0. THE FIRST ITEM OF BUSINESS IS
[C. Regular Hearing]
PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDERED, EXCUSE ME, CONSIDERATION OF THREE -- IT'S A REGULAR HEARING, NOT A PUBLIC HEARING.CONSIDERATION OF THREE ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS ASSOCIATED WITH LANDSCAPE STANDARDS AND BUILDING MATERIALS IN THE I-35-E CORRIDOR, OVERLAY CORE SUB DISTRICT ON POINT 5211 ACRES, LOCATED AT 1844 NORTH STEM MONDAY STREET WAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1 BLOCK A ZONE GENERAL BUSINESS AS REQUESTED BT BUTCHER THAT NAME, OF CIVIL URBAN ASSOCIATES LLC ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY OWNER, MY SIN INVESTMENTS LLC, CASE NUMBER
>> HI. GOO-GOO EVENING, COMMISSIONER.
NORTHERN MORE IS AN EXISTING BUSINESS AND LOCATED OFF IN THE NORTHBOUND PORTION OF THE I-35 HIGHWAY.
THEY ARE -- THE PROPERTY OWNER APPROACHED THE CITY ABOUT EXPANDING, LET'S SEE, ABOUT EXPANDING THE EXISTING BUILDING FOR PRINT AND DOING SOME IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SITE.
AS A RESULT OF THE IMPROVEMENT, THEY ARE REQUESTING THREE ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS WHICH ARE ASSOCIATED WITH LANDSCAPING AND ONE WITH BUILDING MATERIALS TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXISTING CONDITIONS. THE FIRST ALTERNATIVE STANDARD IS TO ALLOW PARKING WITHIN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED LANDSCAPING STRIP. WITHIN THE I-35 FOR SUB DISTRICT, THERE NEEDS TO BE A 25-FOOT LANDSCAPE STRIP.
HOWEVER, DUE TO CONSTRAINTS ON THE SITE AND THE NEED TO ACCOMMODATE MINIMUM PARKING AS WELL AS REQUIRED FIRE LANE, THE MOST LOGICAL PLACE WHERE THE PARKING TO GO IS WITHIN THE FRONT WHERE THAT LANDSCAPE STRIP WOULD BE.
THERE WILL BE TWO LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON THE SIDE, BUT IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THAT'S WHERE THE PARKING WILL NEED TO GO. THE SECOND IS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF TREES ON SITE FROM SEVEN TO FOUR.
THIS ALSO HAS TO DO WITH EXISTING SITE CONSTRAINTS BEING BOTH WITH THE I-35, THE HIGHWAY, TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE, AND THEN THERE'S ALSO A 30-FOOT EGRESS EASEMENT ON THE EASTERN PORTION, SOUTHEASTERN PORTION THAT WOULD PREVENT THE ABILITY TO PLANT TREES THERE. SO THE -- IS RECOMMENDING FOUR TREE WHICH IS THEY CAN SAFELY ACCOMMODATE TO THE REAR OF THE SITE. SCENE ABOVE.
THE LAST ALTERNATIVE STANDARD IS TO REDUCE THE 80% GENEROUS REQUIREMENT, THAT IS ALSO ASSOCIATED WITH THE CORE SUB DISTRICT OF I-35 OVERLAY. AS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED, SEE IF I CAN ... IS MADE OF 100% CMU, THE NEW EDITION THEY ARE PROPOSING TO ACCOMMODATE THE REQUIREMENT ON THE FRONT FACADE WHICH WILL BE FACING I-35, IT WILL BE NEARLY 100% STONE. BUT ON THE EAST AND WEST PORTIONS WHICH APPEAR, WILL NOT BE AS VISIBLE FROM RIGHT OF WAY, THEY ARE PROPOSING ABOUT A 15% MIX OF STONE WITH THE REST OF IT BEING CMU. AND THEN ON THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY WHICH IS COMPLETELY OBSCURED FROM RIGHT OF WAY WITH EXISTING TREES, THEY ARE POSING 100% CMU.
IN THIS CASE, STAFF DOES NOT SEE ANY ISSUES WITH THIS, ESPECIALLY AS IT WOULD MATCH THE EXISTING FACADE AND SO FOR ALL THREE ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS, WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT THE PLANNING
[00:05:02]
AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL.>> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER, DO YOU HAVE A
QUESTION? >> I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE STATUS OF THE TECH SIDE RIGHT OF WAY.
WHERE IT'S GOING TO BE FACING? >> YES.
>> THAT'S NOT AS -- IT SHOULDN'T BE AS HIGH-SPEED AS IT IS.
BUT IS THERE ANY CONCERN FROM TEXTOT ON HAVING THE PARKING
FRONT? >> YEAH, AT THE MOMENT, I HAVEN'T HEARD ANYTHING. I BELIEVE AS A PART OF THEIR ENGINEERING SITE PLAN THEY NEEDED TO GET SOME TEXTOT PERMISSION FOR THE DRIVEWAYS, SD ANYTHING ON THAT FRONT OF ADDITIONALLY, WITHIN OUR CODE, WE DO ALLOW SOME -- OR WE DO ALLOW PARKING TO BE IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING NEAR 35, JUST THE CASE WITH THIS ONE IS SINCE IT WOULD BE WITHIN THAT REQUIRED 2S WHY AN ALTERNATIVE STANDARD IS ALLOWED.
BUT WE HAVE PROVISIONS IN THE CODE TO ALLOW IT TO BE CLOSE TO
THE HIGHWAY. >> JUST AS IMPERFECT AS MY INTERPRETATION OF THE DIAGRAM WAS, THE PLACE OF THE TIRE STOP MAY BE REALLY IMPORTANT TO ASSESS.
>> OF -- OF WHICH PART? >> OF THOSE PARKING PLACES, THE
TIRE STOPS. >> OH, RIGHT, YEAH.
>> SOMEBODY BACKS, IN THEY MAY HAVE -- THEY MAY EXTEND FURTHER
OUT THAN ANTICIPATED. >> GOT YOU.
[INAUDIBLE] >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
>> I GUESS, I'M SORRY, JUST TO YOUR POINT THERE, AND IT MIGHT BE A LITTLE HARD TO SEE, I BELIEVE THIS IS ABOUT -- THIS IS SHOWING NINE-FOOT. SO THERE'S THE LANDSCAPING STRIP OR THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND THAT THEY'RE ADDING HERE BUT THERE'S ALREADY EXISTING LANDSCAPING ON THE OTHER SIDE OF WHERE THESE SHRUBS ARE THAT EXTENDS A LITTLE OVER 9 FEET.
>> OKAY, SO IT'S NOT -- >> YEAH, IT WOULDN'T BE COMPLETELY WITHIN. SO I WOULDN'T IMAGINE, UNLESS SOMEONE HAS A REALLY LONG BED, BUT I DON'T IMAGINE --
>> SPEEDING ISN'T A PROBLEM ALONG THIS PORTION OF THE 35 SERVICE ROAD, CITIZENS IS SO CLOSE TO LIKE THE PARK.
>> I -- I MISRED THE DIAGRAM, THANK YOU.
>> IF THERE ARE NO OTHER QUESTIONS, I WILL ENTERTAIN A
MOTION. >> MOTION TO APPROVE THE ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS AS PRESENTED.
MOTION CARRIES, 7-0. >> COMMISSIONERS, THIS ITEM WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WHO WILL MAKE A FINAL DECISION ON MONDAY, AUGUST THE 3RD, 2026 AT 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M.
[D. Public Hearings]
THANK YOU. >>> NEXT IS A PUBLIC HEARING.
CONSIDERATION -- CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PARTICLE 3, DEVELOPMENT AND ZONING PROCEDURES OF VOLUME 2 OF THE LUCY CODE, KNOWN AS THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDING CHAPTER 3.6, ZONING PETITIONS AND PROCEDURES TO CLARIFY AND STREAMLINE THE ZONING PETITION PROCESS, INCLUDING APPEALS AND A LINE, NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES WITH THE STATE STATUTES AMENDING CHAPTER 3.10 ZONING REGULATION TEXT AMENDMENTS AND PROCEDURES TO BROADEN ITS APPLICATION TO ALL TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THE UNION TIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AND TO CLARIFY AND STREAMLINE THE TEXT AMENDMENT PROCESS, INCLUDING APPEALS, AND ALIGN NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES WITH THE STATE STATUTES AND DELETE CHAPTER 3.11 PROCEDURES FOR ALL OTHER TEXT AMENDMENTS PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE, REPEALER, SEVERALLABILITY, A PENALTY, AND AN EFFECTING DATE. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS.
SO THE PURPOSE OF OUR CLAIRE IF I -- THESE TEXT AMENDMENTS ARE PRIMARILY TO MAKE SURE WE ARE IN ALIGNMENT WITH STATE STATUTES AS YOU READ BUT ALSO TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN SIMPLIFY THE PROCESS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE WHEN IT COMES TO ZONE CHANGE PROCEDURES AND TEXT AMENDMENTS. AND SO REALLY TO GIVE YOU A SUMMARY OF WHAT THESE TEXT AMENDMENTS AND THAT ORDINANCE WOULD DO IS THEY WOULD MIRROR THE REQUIREMENTS FOR WEBSITE POSTING FROM STATE ORDINANCE AND OUR CODE AS WELL AS PROPERTY SIGNED DIMENSION, WHICH WE'RE A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT.
THEY DIDN'T HAVE SIGNED REQUIREMENTS BEFORE BUT NOW THEY
[00:10:01]
DO WITH A MINIMUM SIGN REQUIREMENT.WE HAD A SIGN REQUIREMENT BUT NOW WE'RE ADDING THAT SAME MINIMUM SIZE TO BE CONSISTENT. AND THEN WE ARE ALSO MODIFYING THE TEXT TO ALLOW THE ADVERTISING PERIOD SOCIETY PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION PERIOD, AND THE CITY COUNCIL TO OVERLAP. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE HAD DONE IN THE PAST, SO WE MIGHT SEND THE NOTIFICATION FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND TYPICALLY IS ABOUT A MONTH TO CITY COUNCIL. BUT IF IT'S A HIGH PRIORITY ITEM OR AN ITEM THAT'S VERY STRAIGHTFORWARD WITH -- IT MAKES A BIG DIFFERENCE TO THE APPLICANT, AND IF STAFF HAS CAPABILITY TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE PREPARED FOR CITY COUNCIL, THEN QUICKLY TURN THAT -- QUICKLY TURNI TURNING THAT AROUR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION THIS GIVES US THE ABILITY TO HAVE IT BASICALLY P & Z AND TWO WEEKS LATER CITY COUNCIL. SO IT CAN STREAMLINE THINGS FOR OUR APPLICANTS. BUT IT WOULD NOT BE USED AS A DEFAULT METHOD BECAUSE IT DOES TAKE A LOT MORE STAFF TIME AND EFFORT TO MAKE SURE WE ARE TURNING THAT AROUND EFFECTIVELY AND CORRECTLY, BUT WE DO WANT TO HAVE THAT TOOL BACK WHEN IT'S APPROPRIATE. THE SECOND THING IS DOES, IS WE HAD TWO TEXT AMENDMENT PROCESSES IN THE UDC.
WE HAVE FOR TEXT AMENDMENTS THAT ARE ZONING RELATED AND OTHER TYPES OF TEXT AMENDMENTS. BUT THOSE PROCESSES ARE SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR, SO WE'RE COMBINING IT INTO ONE PROCESS AND THAT WAY WE'RE FOLLOWING THE STRICTER PROCESS FOR EVERYTHING.
THAT'S JUST MORE NOTIFICATION AND TRANSPARENCY BUT IT ALSO MAKES IT EASIER FOR STAFF. WE'RE NOT GOING TO ACCIDENTALLY USE THE WRONG PROCESS FOR THE WRONG TEXT AMENDMENT.
AND SO THAT KIND OF CLARIFIES AND SIMPLIFIES THINGS IN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE NOTIFICATIONS THERE ARE SIMPLY PUBLICATION IN THE NEWSPAPER.
BEFORE P COMMAND Z AND BEFORE CITY COUNCIL BEFORE ANY TEXT AMENDMENT. IF ANYTHING IS GOING TO BE MADE NONCONFORMING IF THERE'S AN EXISTING BUSINESS THAT WOULD BE NONCONFORMING THE STATE STATUES AND REGULATIONS APPLIES THAT WE HAVE TO NOTIFY THOSE BUSINESS OWNERS AND PROPERTY OWNSERS BY MAIL SO WE WILL CONTINUE TO DO THAT AS WELL.
WE ALSO REFINE AND CLARIFY THE SUPER MAJORITY VOTE REQUIREMENT.
SO THAT'S REQUIRED IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS DENIAL OF A PROJECT, IT REQUIRES A SUPER MAJORITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE IT BUT ALSO IF THERE'S A PETITION AGAINST THE REZONING REQUEST BY IMPACTED PROPERTY OWNERS AND THAT'S GOING TO BE THEIR 20 OR 60%, DEPENDING ON THE SPECIFIC TYPE OF REQUEST. THAT WOULD ALSO TRIGGER A SUPER MAJORITY VOTE OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND SO WE'VE CLARIFIED KIND OF WHAT THOSE PETITIONS ARE, AND HOW PEOPLE CAN SUBMIT THEM. WE'VE NEVER REALLY HAD ANYTHING REACH THAT LEVEL WHERE IT WOULD TRIGGER A SUPER MAJORITY VOTE BY COUNCIL BUT IT'S NICE TO HAVE THOSE POLICIES AND PROTESTED DURING IN PLACE JUST IN CASE THAT DOES EVER HAPPEN.
AND THEN WE ALSO DID CLARIFY THE ABILITY FOR TABLING, AN APPLICATION OR WITHDRAWING ONE. OFTENTIMES THIS IS DONE AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT. WE'VE GONE AHEAD AND CODIFIED OUR STANDARD PRACTICE WHICH IS IF WE HAVEN'T PUBLISHED THE NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING YET, WE HAVEN'T SAID THAT WE'RE HAVING THE HEARING ON THIS DATE, STAFF WILL GO AHEAD AND HONOUR THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO WITHDRAW OR RESCHEDULE TO A LATER MEETING F WE HAVE PUBLISHED THE HEARING NOTIFICATION WHEN THE APPLICANT MAKES THE REQUEST, THEN IT BECOMES THE PREROGATIVE OF EITHER THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OR THE CITY COUNCIL WHOEVER IS APPLICABLE TO DECIDE WHETHER YOU WANT TO GRANT THEM THAT, WITH TABLE THE ITEM, OR IF YOU WANT TO GO AHEAD AND HAVE YOUR HEARING AND MAKE YOUR DECISION. SO THAT IS REALLY JUST CODIFYING WHAT WE'VE BEEN DOING JUST TO MAKE IT CLEAR AND STRAIGHTFORWARD. SO I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE, AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION TONIGHT IS THAT YOU APPROVE -- RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE AS
PRESENTED. >> COMMISSIONER'S QUESTION?
>> MICHEL, I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE FIRST BULLET ON THE SECOND PAGE. REGARDING THE OVERLAP OF THE
ADVERTISING PERIODS. >> MM-HMM.
>> DOES THAT DO ANYTHING TO OUR ABILITY TO TABLE AN ITEM WITHOUT IT CONFLICTING WITH THE COUNCIL'S TIMELINE?
>> AND THIS IS WHY WE DON'T -- ANOTHER REASON WHY WE DON'T USE THAT TOO MUCH BECAUSE IT -- IT -- IT DOESN'T TAKE AWAY YOUR ABILITY TO TABLE THE ITEM. YOU ABSOLUTELY STILL CAN TABLE THE ITEM. IT DOES MAKE MORE WORK FOR US TO KIND OF RECONFIGURE THAT ITEM FOR CITY COUNCIL, AND HAVE THE -- IT POSTED ON THE AGENDA THAT THIS ITEM, YOU KNOW, HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN. WE PUBLISHED A PUBLIC HEARING SO WE HAVE TO HAVE IT ON THE AGENDA BUT WE ALSO HAVE TO LET PEOPLE KNOW WE'RE ACTUALLY NOT GOING TO TALK ABOUT IT.
SO IT DOES CREATE A RIM EFFECT BUT IF THAT'S A GOOD DECISION TO MAKE, IT DOES NOT TAKE AWAY YOUR ABILITY TO DO THAT.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONER?
>> IN THAT CASE, I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM MAY COME FORWARD.
STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE, AND WE'LL BE HAPPY TO HEAR FROM YOU. HAVING NO ONE COME FORWARD, I
[00:15:06]
WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING COMMISSIONERS, I WILL ENTERTAINTHE MOTION. >> MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL
AMENDMENTS AS PRESENTED. >> MOTION BY JOSHUA.
SECONDED BY JACK. YOU MAY VOTE.
CARRIED 7-0. >> COMMISSIONERS, THIS ITEM WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MONDAY, AUGUST THE 3RD, 2026, WHERE THEY WILL HOLD A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING AND MAKE A FINAL DECISION AND THAT WILL BE AT 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M.,
THANK YOU. >> NEXT ITEM OF BUSINESS IS ALSO A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE GRANT AGO SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A SMOKING ESTABLISHMENT ON A PORTION OF APPROXIMATELY 1.828-ACRE TRACT LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 3 R-1 BLOCK C, HIGH POINT OAKES LOCATED AT 2680 DENTON TAP ROAD, ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AS REQUESTED BY IN HEED, THE APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF THE HILLTOP CORNER LLC, THE PROPERTY OWNER.
CASE NUMBER 26-05-8-SUP. >>> GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS.
THE LOUNGE IS A PROPOSED BUSINESS IN LEWISVILLE LOOKING TO BE A HOOKAH LOUNGE, THEREFORE THEY REQUIRE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A SMOKING ESTABLISHMENT.
THE PARTNERS ARE COMMITTED TO MAKING SURE THAT THEIR BUSINESS IS NOT A NUISANCE OR PUBLIC SAFETY CONCERN.
AND THEIR NARRATIVE LETTER, THEY HAVE OUTLINED SEVERAL OF THE WAYS THAT THEY WILL BE MITIGATING SOME OF THE PAST ISSUES, OTHER HOOKAH LOUNGES IN LEWISVILLE HAVE RUN INTO, THIS INCLUDES IDING ALL CUSTOMERS TO MAKE SURE THAT ONLY THOSE 21-PLUS WILL BE PARTICIPATING, THOUGH THOSE UNDER-- UNDER21 WILL STILL BE ABLE TO SIT AND ENJOY THE FOOD THAT THEY WILL ALSO OFFER. LIGHT REFRESHMENTS, I SHOULD SPECIFY. THEY WILL ALSO BE INSTALLING VENTILATION SYSTEM THAT IS UP TO CODE WITH OUR BUILDING CODE AND FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONALLY, THEY ARE COMMITTED TO MAINTAINING THE ATMOSPHERE AS RELAXING AND NOT ENCOURAGING ANY SORT OF DANCING OR PARTYING BY ENSURING THAT THERE WILL NOT BE A DANCE FLOOR, AND THAT THERE IS NO DJ BOOTH.
THERE WILL BE, LIKE, REGULAR BACKGROUND MUSIC, BUT THAT WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS IN A RESTAURANT OR ANY OTHER ESTABLISHMENT, AND THEY WILL HAVE TV'S FOR PATRONS TO ENJOY, BUT AGAIN MORE AS A BACKGROUND VERSUS ANYTHING LARGE AND PARTYING. ALL OF THESE CONDITIONS WILL BE OUTLINED IN THE ORDINANCE. THE ORIGINAL RECOMMENDATION WAS TO TABLE IT AS STAFF K CONTINUEO DO SOME RESEARCH, BUT AFTER DISCUSSING WITH THE APPLICANT AND CONFIRM CONFIRMING WITH OURE DEPARTMENT THAT THERE WERE NO PRIOR INCIDENCES RELATED TO THIS PROPERTY OWNER, BUSINESS OWNERS STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL AS PRESENTED.
I AM HERE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS AS WELL AS THE
APPLICANT. >> COMMISSIONERS, QUESTIONS?
>> SINCE THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ANYONE WHO WISHES TO COME FORWARD AND SPEAK, PLEASE DO.
WE WOULD LOVE TO HEAR FROM YOU. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR
>> COMMISSIONERS MY NAME IS NAHEED MILANO, I AM HERE FOR QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT.
>> I DO APPRECIATE THIS A LOT. THIS HELPS ME UNDERSTAND THINGS
THAT ARE NEW TO ME. >> THANK YOU.
>> WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. HAVING NO ONE ELSE COME FORWARD, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIONERS, I WILL ENTERTAIN
A MOTION. >> MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL
OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT. >> SECOND.
[00:20:03]
>> MOTION BY JOSH WARS SECOND BY FRANCESCA.
>> COMMISSIONERS. THIS ITEM WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WHO WILL HOLD A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING AND MAKE A FINAL DECISION ON MONDAY, AUGUST THE 3RD, 2026 AT 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M. THANK YOU.
[E. Other Business]
>> THANK YOU. NEXT ITEM OF BUSINESS IS SELECTION OF A CHAIR AND A VICE CHAIR, AS I AM READY TO VACATE THIS CHAIR, I WOULD LIKE TO NOMINATE ERUM ALI FOR CHAIR.
>> I SECOND THAT. >> MOTION BY KAREN AND SECOND BY FRANCESCA. THERE IT COMES.
>> MOTION CARRIES 7-0. >> YOU GET TO DO THAT BECAUSE
YOU ARE NOW THE CHAIRMAN. >> THANKS FOR THE WARNING.
I GUESS, THEN WE NEED TO SELECT A VICE CHAIR.
I WILL ENTERTAIN, I WOULD LOVE FOR YOU TO SWITCH PLACES WITH ME. NOSH ANYBODY ELSE WANT TO THROW THEIR NAME OR ARE WE OKAY WITH KAREN BEING VICE CHAIR?
>> LY IF NOBODY ELSE IS INTERESTED.
>> CAN SOMEBODY MAKE A MOTION? >> YOU MAY.
>> REPEAT THE MOTION SO THAT WE CAN --
>> BUT THERE'S ONE MOTION. >> I MEAN, I MADE A MOTION FOR KAREN TO SWITCH AND BE VICE CHAIR.
ARE YOU INTERESTED -- I MEAN I SHOULD ASK HER IF SHE ...
>> YEAH, THAT -- THAT -- THAT ORIGINAL MOTION IS STILL ON THE
FLOOR. >> OKAY, THEN I SECOND THAT
>> OKAY, SO THE MOTION ON THE FLOOR WAS MADE BY ERUM TO NOMINATE KAREN LOCK, AND IT WAS SECONDED BY FRANCISCA, SO NOW
YOU WILL CALL FOR THE VOTE. >> OKAY, PLEASE VOTE.
ALL RIGHT. MOTION PASSED 7-0, YEAH!
[F. Announcements]
THANK YOU, EVERYBODY. DO WE HAVE ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS?>> NO ANNOUNCEMENTS. >> NO ANNOUNCEMENTS.
ALL RIGHTY, THEN WITH THAT, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO
ADJOURN. >> MOTION TO ADJOURN.
OH, I'M SORRY, JOSHUA! >> OKAY, MOTION BY JOSH,
SECONDED BY FRANCISKA? >> SURE.
>> THERE WE GO. AND WE ARE
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.