[Workshop Session - 6:15 P.M. ] [00:00:08] >> ALL RIGHT, GOOD EVENING AND WELCOME TO THE LEWISVILLE CITY COUNCIL WITH SHOP. WE ARE BEGINNING HERE AT 6:15 P.M. AND IT IS 100 DEGREES OUTSIDE. I'M NOT GOING TO GET INTO IT. WE HAVE A QUORUM. THESE MICROPHONES PICK UP EVERYTHING. SO DO NOT BREATHE. PER STEP, WE WILL HAVE A DISCUSSION OF OUR CONSENT AND REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS. -- FIRST UP, WE WILL HAVE A DISCUSSION OF OUR CONSENT AND REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS. THIS IS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR COMMERCIAL EASEMENT OUTDOORS ON 5.4 ACRES, WHERE THE EXPANDED PICKLEBALL COURTS ARE. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON THAT ONE? ALL RIGHT. ITEM TWO, PUBLIC HEARING. REZONING 7 ACRES. THIS IS FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MULTIFAMILY THREE. WE WILL HAVE TO GO IN TO CLOSE SESSION ON THIS ONE. THERE IS SOME CONVERSATION ON THAT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS ONE FROM THE PUBLIC? >> WE ARE GOING TO GO TO CLOSED SESSION. >> ITEM THREE, PUBLIC HEARING. THIS IS DETERMINING A SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURE. THIS ONE HAS BEEN STANDING AROUND FOR A BIT. >> IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING AT THIS POINT THAT AT LEAST THREE OF THE FOUR STRUCTURES HAVE BEEN DOVAL IT-- DEMOLISHED. I THINK ALL ARE IN THE PROCESS OF BEING DEMOLISHED? >> WE CONFIRM THIS AFTERNOON THAT ALL HAVE BEEN DEMOLISHED. [INDISCERNIBLE] >> WHAT WE ARE RECOMMENDING IS THAT YOU CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL OUR NEXT COUNCIL HEARING SO WE CAN ENSURE ALL THE STRUCTURES ARE GONE AND THAT NOTHING LEFT STANDS. RIGHT NOW I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE WOULD CONDEMN AND WHAT WE WOULD NOT. SO IF YOU'LL GIVE US-- OUTBUILDINGS. >> WE HAVE NOT BEEN ON THE SITE. BUT WE DO KNOW THE PRESSURES ON THE GROUND. WE KNOW THERE IS A BUILDING STANDING. WE KNOW THERE ARE HOLES THERE. AND WE THINK ONE CARPORT IS STILL STANDING. BUT THE BUILDINGS, BECAUSE OF THE VISIBILITY FROM WHERE WE VIEW THE PROPERTY, WE CAN'T SEE THEM. [INDISCERNIBLE] >> WE HAVE NOT SEEN ANYTHING RECENTLY. [INDISCERNIBLE] >> I THINK THE MOVE HERE IS THAT WE ARE GOING TO CONTINUE THIS PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL OUR NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING. THAT WILL ALLOW THIS TO BE FINISHED UP AND ALLOWS US TO GO AHEAD IF WE NEED TO BUILD A STRUCTURE TO GET WHAT WE NEED DONE FINISHED IN A FEW WEEKS. AND THAT GOES AWAY. WE DON'T NEED THAT ONE. >> SO WE ARE GOING TO CONTINUE? >> YES, EACH ONE OF THESE. WE WILL CONTINUE. >> TO WE HAVE TO DO A SEPARATE MOTION? [INDISCERNIBLE] >> I TRIED. >> YOU DON'T HAVE TO READ ALL THAT. >> AUGUST 3RD. >> WE ARE GOING TO HAVE EVERYBODY READ THEM. AND WE WILL PUT IT IN A INC WHO DID IT THE BEST. [LAUGHTER] THAT IS ITEM THREE. THAT'S THE SAME FOR 2304. ITEM FIVE IS THE SAME 2316. ITEM SIX IS THE SAME FOR 23-28. >> HOW DID THESE PROPERTIES BECOME DELINQUENT? >> I THINK THERE WAS A DEVELOPMENT AND THE PROPERTY DEVELOPER HAD STALLED. SO THEY KEEP SAYING THEY ARE GOING TO START AGAIN. AND ONCE THEY START GETTING CODE ENFORCEMENT, THEY SAID THEY WOULD DEMOLISH AND THEY GOT A COUPLE PERMITS OVER THE LAST YEAR, TWO YEARS. [INDISCERNIBLE] >> IT ALLOWED THEM TO BE TAKEN OVER BY WHATEVER. >> ITEM D. WE HAD SOME FOLKS FROM COUNCIL HILLS WHO COME TO SPEAK FROM-- ABOUT KING ARTHUR. [00:05:03] I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THIS PART TO THE FRONT OF THE MEETING. UNLESS THERE IS AN OBJECTION TO THAT. [INDISCERNIBLE] >> IT'S FINE. I AM FINE. >> ITEM E PICK THE CONSENT AGENDA. WE HAVE NO ITEMS ON THE REGULAR HEARING. AND NO ADDITIONAL CLOSED SESSION. >> WE ARE GOING TO DO ALL THE CLOSE SESSION AT THE BEGINNING. >> SO DO I NEED TO DO ALL THESE FOR THE BEGINNING? AND THAT IS THE AGENDA REVIEW. LET'S MOVE ON TO WORKS UP-- WORKSHOP SESSION. ITEM D. TEXAS VENDOR REGULATIONS. MICHELLE HERNANDEZ IS GOING TO GIVE THE PRESENTATION. >> GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. WE ARE BRINGING THIS TO YOU TO GIVE YOU AN UPDATE ON WHAT'S GOTTEN INTO THE STATE OF TEXAS IN TERMS OF MOBILE FOOD VENDOR LAWS. BUT WE ALSO WANT TO LOOK AT WHAT IT MEANS TO OUR CITY AND WHAT ARE SOME THINGS WE CAN LOOK AT DOING. I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT THE THINGS WE ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT, SOME ARE IN REVIEW. BUT WHAT I'M TRYING TO LOOK AT IS WHAT WE CAN DO FROM A CITY PERSPECTIVE TO COME UP WITH REGULATIONS AS IT RELATES TO FOOD TRUCKS. AND SOME OF THE STUFF GOING AWAY BASED ON LEGISLATION THAT CAME OUT THIS MONTH. AND I WILL ALSO TOUCH ON AS I MENTIONED SOME FRAMEWORK FROM A FOOD VENDOR'S PERSPECTIVE TO LOOK AT WHAT WE COULD PUT IN PLACE IN TERMS OF REGULATION. ONE OF THOSE THINGS, AND I WILL TALK A BIT ABOUT THIS LATER IS PUTTING A DEFINITION ON WHAT A MOBILE FOOD VENDOR IS. THE STATE DEFINES IT AS ANY PERSON WHO DISPENSES FOOD AND BEVERAGES FROM A FOOD STANDARD VEHICLE, RELATED TO CONSUMPTION. SO THAT COULD BE A TRAILER OR OTHER THINGS AS WELL. SO I'M SAYING THIS TO PREFACE WHAT I'M GOING TO TALK ABOUT. >> GOOD EVENING COUNCIL. I AM THE SUPERVISOR FOR THE CITY OF LEWISVILLE. SOME OF YOU KNOW ME FROM PRIOR PRESENTATIONS ON THIS TOPIC. I AM HERE TO HOPEFULLY TRY TO GET THIS PROCESS GOING IN THE CITY. WHEN I MET WITH YOU GUYS A COUPLE YEARS AGO, THE STATE WAS GOING THROUGH SOME PROPOSED LEGISLATION. AND WE HAD TO KIND OF STALL OUR INTERNAL REVIEW BECAUSE OF THIS BILL. LAST YEAR TEXAS HB 2028-2024 WAS PASSED. AND WHAT THAT DID WAS-- THE INTENTION WAS TO CREATE STATEWIDE CONSISTENCY FOR THE VENDORS, AND ALSO TO LIMIT THE ABILITY OF CITIES AND COUNTIES TO ISSUE PERMITS. AND IT TRANSFERRED ALL DO RESPONSIBILITY FROM THIS TYPE OF OPERATION, FROM LOCALS TO THE STATE LEVEL. AND IT ALSO ADDED LANGUAGE TO PREVENT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FROM ADDING REQUIREMENTS THAT CONFLICT WITH THE LANGUAGE IN THE STATUTE. WE WENT THROUGH A REVIEW OF OUR CITY ORDINANCE AND WE IDENTIFY A FEW SECTIONS THAT PERSIST IN CONFLICT WITH THE LANGUAGE OF THE STATUTE OR THE LAW. WE IDENTIFIED SECTION 7-241 AND 7-2045. THEY WILL HAVE TO BE AMENDED AT SOME POINT AND WE WILL HAVE TO BREAK DOWN SOME OF THOSE CHANGES FOR YOU GUYS AGAIN ONCE THE PROCESS HAS BEEN COMPLETED. BUT THIS SECTION, 240, IS ABOUT GENERAL OPERATION. 241 IS THE GENERAL OVERVIEW OF [00:10:01] VENDORS AT THE CITY LEVEL. AND 245 IS FOR ROADSIDE VENDORS. WE HAVE NOT REALLY HAD A LOT OF ROADSIDE VENDORS IN A LONG TIME. SO IT'S A GOOD OPPORTUNITY TO MAYBE REVISE SOME OF THOSE SECTIONS. FOR THIS BILL TO BECOME LAW WE IDENTIFY SOME AREAS IN WHICH WE HAVE SOME CONCERNS, AND THAT IS WHY WE ARE DOING THIS PRESENTATION WITH YOU GUYS TODAY. NOW THAT THE PERMIT AUTHORITY IS NOT WITH THE CITY, IT'S WITH THE STATE, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE SOMETHING THAT WILL ALLOW US TO REVIEW AND ENSURE THAT VENDORS DO HAVE A VALID-- VALID PERMIT ISSUED BY THE STATE OF TEXAS. WE ALSO WANT TO LOOK AT THE USE OF LAND. BECAUSE THEY HAD NOW COME ON TO ANY COMMERCIAL PROPERTY AND CONDUCT BUSINESS FOR AN UNSPECIFIED AMOUNT OF TIME. SO WE WANTED TO LOOK AT THAT AS WELL. AND AN OFFICIAL WILL TALK MORE ABOUT IT. ALSO THIS NEW LAW REQUIRES AUTHORIZATION AND AGREEMENT TO BE SIGNED. AND WE WANTED TO HAVE THE POSSIBILITY LOCALLY TO LOOK OVER THAT AND ENSURE IT IS BEING DONE. WE HAVE IDENTIFIED SOME AREAS IN WHICH WE HAVE TO LOOK AT ADOPTING SOME EXCEPTIONS TO THIS. AND WE WILL TALK MORE ABOUT IT IN OUR PRESENTATION TODAY. >> THE AUTHORIZATION AND RESTROOM ACCESS, I DON'T KNOW IF THEY ARE SPECIFIED BY LAW. I THINK THEY WOULD BE BUT WE THINK IS IMPORTANT TO HAVE OR WE CAN CHECK THE VEHICLE AND AUTHORIZE THEM TO BE THERE, AND THAT THERE IS RESTROOM ACCESS SOMEWHERE FOR THE WORKERS WHO WORK THERE. SO THOSE ARE THE THINGS THAT WE PLAN TO BE ABLE TO MONITOR FOR IN THE FUTURE AND WILL CREATE-- WE WILL CREATE REGULATIONS THAT WILL DO THAT. >> DID YOU SAY ON COMMERCIAL PROPERTY? LIKE IN THE PARK-- PARKING LOT? BUT NOT ON THE STREET, BLOCKING PARKING SPACES. >> WE DO HAVE SOME LANGUAGE THAT WE INTEND TO KEEP THAT WILL CONTROL SOME OF THOSE ELEMENTS. WE DO KNOW, WE HAVE LANGUAGE IN THE CODE THAT WAS ADDED YEARS AGO BECAUSE WE HAVE THOSE TRAFFIC HAZARDS, AND SOME TRAFFIC RELATED ISSUES TO ADDRESS. SO WE ARE KEEPING THAT LANGUAGE IN. THE INTENTION IS TO KEEP THE LANGUAGE THERE. >> YOU CAN ABSOLUTELY ASK QUESTIONS WHEN... [INDISCERNIBLE] >> JUST TO CONTINUE WITH THIS TOPIC, WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT, OUR PLANNING DEPARTMENT, WE WILL HAVE SOME LANGUAGE, AND YOU WILL GO DEEPER INTO THIS TO NOT ALLOW THE OPERATION IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS AND ALSO HAVE A CONVERSATION ABOUT THE LANGUAGE WHEN WE HAVE TWO OR MORE OPERATORS IN CITY LAW AND HOW THAT IMPACTS THE OPERATION. WE WILL REQUIRE AN SEP FOR THAT-- ASAP FOR THAT. WE ALSO ARE LOOKING AT THE FIRE LANES AND FIRE CODES. WE ALSO HAVE SOME LANGUAGE WHERE WE INTEND TO KEEP UNDER CHA CHAPTER 7, THIS IS SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO THE OPERATION AROUND SCHOOLS, ALSO OPERATION WITHIN CITY PARKS, OPERATION IN SELLING THE RIGHT WEIGHT, AS WELL AS CODES THAT WE HAVE ALREADY ON THE BOOKS, REGARDING SIGNS, AND WASTE DISPOSAL. AND WE HAVE THAT UNDER CHAPTER 16 IN THE UTILITY CODE. >> AS WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER, WE ARE LOOKING AT THE THINGS THAT WE WANT TO CHANGE. A LOT OF THE CITIES ARE IN THE SAME SPOT. AND WE ARE WELL AWARE THAT WE ARE PRESENTING CHANGES WHERE WE ARE STILL TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT REGULATIONS TO PUT IN PLACE. A LOT OF THIS STUFF IS NEW. AND THAT'S WHY WE ARE REITERATING THAT WE ARE REVIEWING IT AND PRIORITIZING BRING IT TO COUNCIL TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN GET YOUR IDEAS OF WHAT YOU WANT US TO PUT IN PLACE. SO SOME OF THE THINGS WE ARE LOOKING AT, LICENSING FROM THE STATE, REQUIRING THEM TO SHOW THEIR OWNERSHIP AND AUTHORIZATION WITH REASONABLE [00:15:01] ACCESS TO A RESTROOM. SOME OF THESE THINGS ARE ALREADY REQUIRED BY THE STATE. BUT IN ORDER TO ENFORCE THEM LOCALLY WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THESE ARE INCLUDED IN OUR CODE. >> YOU SAY SOME OF THESE BY THE STATE, WHICH ONES? >> THERE IS HAVING THE AUTHORIZATION FROM THE AUTHORITY AND OWNER. >> THE STATE IS NOW MAKING A PERMIT... [INDISCERNIBLE] >> WE WILL BE WORKING WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT WITH THOSE THINGS AND WE WILL SEE IF THEY DO HAVE A PERMIT POSTED. WE HAVE SOMETHING IN OUR CODE THAT REQUIRES THEM TO HAVE IT POSTED. >> SO IF THEY ARE NONCOMPLIANT WE CAN PULL THE PERMIT ANYMORE, WHAT'S OUR ABILITY-- ABILITY TO ENFORCE THESE THINGS? >> CAN WE SHUT THEM DOWN? >> WE DON'T HAVE THAT LANGUAGE IN THE CODE. AND I DON'T THINK WE HAVE THAT AUTHORITY. THIS IS VERY... WE ARE PROBABLY AHEAD OF MOST CITIES, BUT OUR UNDERSTANDING IS THAT IT CAN BE VERY DIFFICULT FOR US TO SEE-- SEES OPERATIONS BASED ON COMPLIANCE. OUR INSPECTORS ARE NOT ABLE TO GO OUT AND INSPECT THESE TRUCKS. WE HAVE TO REPORT THAT TO THE STATE, AND THE STATE WILL HAVE TO LOOK AT IT. AND IF THEY ARE IN VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE, THAT DECIDES WHETHER YOU CAN ENFORCE ON THEM. >> DOES THAT INCLUDE DIFFERENT TITLES? >> THIS IS WHAT I WILL GET INTO. THESE ARE PART OF THE EXCEPTIONS WE WERE TALKING ABOUT. WE WILL BE HAPPY TO-- IF YOU HAVE MORE QUESTIONS, WE CAN ADDRESS THOSE, BUT WE ARE GOING TO TALK MORE ABOUT IT. >> PUTTING A DEFINITION OF WHAT IS A FOOD MANAGER IN OUR CODE.. SPECIFICALLY OUR BIGGEST RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT IN THE AREA. THE OTHER BIG THING THAT WE ARE BRINGING INTO CONSIDERATION FOR THE PERMIT, AND I WILL JUMP INTO THIS... >> ONE QUICK QUESTION, HOW ARE YOU CONSIDERING THE SUP AND THE SUP PROCESS? >> THAT'S WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO GET INPUT FROM YOU ALL ON. IF WE CAN JUMP TO THIS NEXT SLIDE. TALKING ABOUT REQUIRING AN-- ASAP. INTERNALLY-- A S.A.P.-- SUP. IT WILL TRIGGER THIS SUP PERMIT IF WE DECIDE TO GO THAT ROUTE. THE BIGGEST THING WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT SO FAR IS THREE DAYS WITHIN A CALENDAR MONTH, AS-- IF THEY ARE ON A PIECE OF PROPERTY FOR 30 DAYS WITHIN A CALENDAR MONTH, THAT COULD POTENTIALLY TRIGGER AN-- ASAP-- A SUP THAT THEY ARE NO LONGER MOBILE. THEY ARE SOMEWHAT PERMANENT IN THAT LOCATION. SO THOSE ARE THE OPTIONS THAT WE PRESENT. >> THAT'S KIND OF ONE OF THE DISCUSSION POINTS HERE. DOES THREE DAYS SOUND RIGHT? FIVE DAYS, 30 DAYS? WHAT SOUNDS RIGHT TO TRIGGER THE SUP. >> 'S ESSAY TRIGGER ON THE PROPERTY OR THE VENDOR? >> ON THE PROPERTY. >> AND YOU CAN HAVE TWO OR MORE? >> JUST ONE. >> THERE ARE SPECIFIC LAWS FOR FOOD TRUCKS AND FOOD TRUCK PARKED THAT ALREADY REQUIRE A SUP PROCESS. BUT THIS WOULD SPECIFICALLY BE TARGETED AND FOCUSED ON THE PROPERTY OWNER. SO IT WOULD REQUIRE THE PROPERTY OWNER TO ENGAGE IN THE SUP PROCESS. >> SO THAT COULD BE A TRUCK. >> YES. A SPECIAL FOOD TRUCK. >> IF YOU GET A SUP, APPEAR GOING TO HAVE SHORTER OR LONGER TERM, WHATEVER THAT TERM MEANS TO YOU ALL, YOU CAN GET MORE INFORMATION, LIKE WHERE WILL IT SIT ON THE SITE, WHAT NUISANCE MAYBE AROUND IT THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH IT. YOU CAN GET A LOT MORE INFORMATION. BUT I DON'T THINK YOU WANT TO [00:20:01] GET THAT FOR EVERY FOOD VENDOR THAT HAPPENS TO BE THERE. BUT IF THEY ARE GOING TO BE THERE MORE OF THE TIME OR A LOT OF THE TIME, OR WHATEVER AMOUNT OF TIME YOU THINK, THAT'S WHEN YOU MIGHT WANT TO CONSIDER THE SUP. >> ONE MORE SLIDE. >> SO WE TALKED ABOUT WHAT WE WILL BE LOOKING AT, AND IF WE WILL ENGAGE IN THE SUP PROCESS. ONE THING WE TALKED ABOUT WAS CREATING AN EXCEPTION FOR A CONSTRUCTION SITE THAT HAS A PERMIT. AND IN THE CONVERSATION THAT WE TALKED ABOUT, WE WILL REQUIRE THEM TO GET A SUP IN THE CONSTRUCTION, ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION. THE OTHER ONE IS A PREVIOUS EXCEPTION FOR ICE CREAM TRUCKS AND PUSHCARTS TO SELL IF THEY ARE... 15 MINUTES. IT'S PART OF THE DISCUSSION WE HAD, AND THERE IS CODE FOR THAT ALREADY. SPECIAL EVENTS EXCEPTION, THIS IS SOMETHING WE HAVE IN OUR CODE. >> THIS SAYS WITH PERMIT. SO THEY CAN SELL FOOD THERE IF THEY HAVE A HEALTH-- A PERMIT ALREADY? >> THE LANGUAGE THAT THIS PROPOSES, LET'S SAY WE HAVE THE PERFECT EXAMPLE TODAY, THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. UNDER THE LANGUAGE THAT WAS PROPOSED, IF YOU HAVE A STATE VALID PERMIT, IN A DIFFERENT DIVISION IT MIGHT BE UNLAWFUL. SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IF YOU HAVE THE PERMIT YOU ARE ALLOWED TO DO YOUR BUSINESS. >> THE VENDORS THAT DO FIRST FRIDAY AND STUFF. THAT'S WHERE I'M TRYING-- WHAT I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT. WHERE THEY FALL ON THIS? DO THEY HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE WHOLE... STATE? >> IF THEY ARE ON THE DEFINITION THAT THE STATE PROPOSED OR PASSED, THEN THEY HAVE TO GET A STATE PERMIT. WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ISSUE TEMPORARY FOOD PERMITS FOR MOVER-- MOBILE FOOD VENDORS. IF THE VENDORS ARE COMING TO FIRST FRIDAYS ALREADY, THAT IS A DIFFERENT CONVERSATION. >> SPECIAL EVENTS FOR OUR CONCERT SERIES, THOSE TYPES OF THINGS, WE ALREADY DO THIS. IT'S JUST THE OPERATIONS OF THE SPECIAL EVENTS PART? >> WE HAVE SOMETHING ON HERE FOR COMPANIES AMONG TO BRING IN MOBILE FOOD VENDORS. SO LET'S SAY FOOD TRUCKS AND THEIR STAFF. THAT WOULD BE AN EXCEPTION THAT WE WOULD CREATE. >> WE HAVE FOOD TRUCKS IN CASTLE HILLS THAT ARE JUST SITTING THERE ON PUBLIC STREETS. HOW WOULD THIS AFFECT THAT? >> THE FARMERS' MARKET ITSELF OPERATES AND CAN BRING VENDORS. IF WE HAVE A VENDOR THAT IS NOT PART OF THE MARKET THAT WANTS TO SELL ON PUBLIC PROPERTY, I WOULD ASSUME THEY WILL NEED TO GET AUTHORIZATION FROM THE PARKS DEPARTMENT EVEN IF THEY HAVE A STATE ISSUED PERMIT. IF THAT'S PART OF THE EVENT, THERE IS NO PROBLEM. >> IT'S FLUID. AND WE ARE WORKING THROUGH LEGAL. BUT WE WANTED TO BRING THIS CONVERSATION TO YOU TO LEARN WHAT WE GO THROUGH WHEN YOU BRING IN THE SUP PROCESS. AND WHAT TRIGGERING A SUP PROCESS WOULD MEAN. WHAT DOES IT LOOK LIKE? AND KIND OF GET MORE DIRECTION FROM COUNCIL. WHAT WAY TO GO. WHERE TO REVIEW AND HOW TO PUT THE FINAL DOCUMENT TOGETHER. >> I DON'T KNOW IF I'M TERRIBLY WORRIED ABOUT HOW MANY, IF THAT'S THREE OR FIVE, I DON'T KNOW. BUT I LIKE-- IF YOU ARE GOING TO BE SHOWING UP ON A PROPERTY-- THERE'S TWO TYPES OF PROPERTY. A PROPERTY WITH AN ACTIVE OWNER WHO IS REALLY INTERESTED, DOING WHAT THEY NEED TO DO. YOU WILL HAVE OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS THAT ARE IN ABSENTIA. AND SOMEBODY FINDS SOMEBODY AND [00:25:01] PARKS OUT THERE. AND THAT'S WHAT WE ARE WORRIED ABOUT. SO WE HAVE TO HAVE A DIALOG ABOUT PUTTING UP THE BUSINESS. >> BUT THEY HAVE THE REQUIREMENT, AND OWNER AUTHORIZATION LETTER. THAT'S A STATE REQUIREMENT. WITH RESTROOM ACCESS. >> THAT'S A LITTLE EASIER TO GET THAN A SUP. >> THE STATE PERMIT. >> THE LETTER SAYING THEY CAN USE MY RESTROOM. YOU HAVE TO GET THE STATE PERMIT REGARDLESS. >> BUT THERE HAS TO BE A BUILDING THAT IS OPEN AND OPERATING. >> YOU HAVE A BUILDING THAT IS A RENTAL, LET'S SAY. SO YOU HAVE A RENTAL BUILDING THAT IS IN CALIFORNIA. IF WE GET A LETTER, WE ARE NOT GOING TO GO GET RECOGNITION TO FIND OUT IF IT'S THE GUY IN CALIFORNIA WHO SIGNED IT. [INDISCERNIBLE] >> REALLY I THINK THE ISSUE THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT IS HOW D DOES-- IF SOMEBODY'S GOING TO SET UP A FOOD TRUCK IT'S ABOUT HOW DOES THAT IMPACT THE FLOW OF PEOPLE IN TRAFFIC, RIGHT? >> AND OTHER BUSINESSES. >> YOU DON'T WANT THEM CLAWING AT THE PARKING LOT-- CLOGGING UP THE PARKING LOT. >> I WOULDN'T WANT THEM NEAR A BUSINESS NEAR ME. BECAUSE THEY TAKE OF PARKING SPACES. >> ONE OF THE THINGS WE WERE ALSO TALKING ABOUT IS IF WE WERE LOOKING AT A PROPERTY OWNER WOULD IT BE SPECIFIC TO THE FOOD TRUCK THAT IS BROUGHT ON THERE, AND NOT SPECIFIC TO THE INDIVIDUAL FOOD TRUCK PERSONS MULTIPLE FOOD TRUCKS. >> NO SPECIFIC OPERATOR. >> IS THERE A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF FOOD TRUCKS THEY CAN DO PUBLIC? >> FOR THE FOOD TRUCK PART, IF YOU HAVE TWO OR MORE, THAT REQUIRES A SUP PROCESS. WE CAN TALK ABOUT THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF FOOD TRUCKS TO HAVE TO REQUIRE A SUP. BUT THEY WOULD HAVE TO DO A SUP REGARDLESS. >> DEFINITELY WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A NEIGHBOR SAYS WE WANT TO HAVE A FOOD TRUCK CIRCUS AND BRING IN FOUR OR FIVE AND DO IT AS A FUND-RAISER OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THERE IS SOME INTERESTING CONVERSATION TO BE HAD AROUND THAT. >> BUT THEY CANNOT DO IT ON A RESIDENTIAL STREET? IT HAS TO BE ON COMMERCIAL? >> YES. >> IF I COULD ANSWER YOUR QUESTION. NORMALLY THAT NEIGHBORHOOD WILL APPLY FOR A SPECIAL EVENT. OUR TEAM, PD, FIRE, A LOT OF POLICE DEPARTMENTS WILL LOOK AT IT. >> JUST MOVE MY CONVERSATION OVER TO COMMERCIAL PROPERTY RIGHT AWAY. >> BACK TO WHERE I WAS GOING, WITH THE PURPOSE OF DOING THIS, AS IT RELATES TO THE NUMBER OF DAYS AND MONTHS, I THINK ABOUT IT LIKE A MONTH AND THEN A NUMBER OF WEEKENDS. IF WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A BUSINESS THAT IS GOING TO BRING IN FOOD TRUCK VENDORS, EVERY WEEKEND, THAT IS KIND OF LIKE A NORMAL PARTNER OPERATION. SO I WOULD SAY FOUR TO ME SOUNDS LIKE A GOOD NUMBER. WHICH WOULD MEAN THAT YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE SOMEBODY COMING IN AND SETTING UP AS A VENDOR LIKE EVERY SINGLE WEEKEND. YOU WOULD WANT TO DO A SUP FOR THAT SO THAT YOU CAN MAKE SURE THAT THEY HAVE THE LOCATION PROPERLY, AND THEY ARE NOT BLOCKING FIRE LANES. SO I JUST THROW OUT THE NUM NUMBER 4. >> IT WAS 4.3 WEEKS AND A MONTH. ON AVERAGE. >> ALL OF YOU SEEM TO THINK THE SUP WOULD BE IMPORTANT AT SOME POINT. AND WE HAVE HEARD FOUR-- REFERRED-- >> I WILL GO FOUR. >> IF THEY ARE DOING IT ON THE WEEKENDS. >> TWO WEEKENDS OUT OF THE MONTH, BASICALLY. >> FOUR SATURDAYS, OR FOUR FRIDAYS. >> IT IS A GOOD NUMBER. BETWEEN THREE AND FIVE. >> WE WILL LOOK AT THAT NEXT WEEK. WE CAN ALWAYS RUN IT BACK AND DISCUSS IT. >> WE WILL GO BACK AND CREATE [00:30:04] SOMETHING AND GIVE IT BACK OVER TO THE FOLKS WHO CAN LOOK AT IT. THEY HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR US TO HAVE THIS MEETING. >> I CAN'T WAIT TO SEE WHAT THIS NEXT SESSION BRINGS. >> BECAUSE THAT SUP FALLS UPON THE PROPERTY OWNER AND NOT THE FOOD TRUCK. THE FOOD TRUCKS ARE THE SAME... [INDISCERNIBLE] >> THEY SAID THEY WOULD EXPLORE OPTIONS FOR WHAT IT'S CONNECTED TO. >> IF YOU WANT TO GET SOME GUY WHO HAS A TICKET, IF YOU WANT TO HAVE A CONVERSATION INTERNALLY, AND UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE DOING. WE THINK IT IS GOING TO BE A LOT EASIER IF IT IS TIED TO THE PROPERTY. AND WHOEVER THEY WANT AS AN OPERATOR, HELP-- AS LONG AS THEY FOLLOW THE SUP. >> YOU HAVE OPERATORS WITH MULTIPLE TRUCKS. >> IS THIS TYING OUR HANDS WHEN YOU SEE BAD ACTORS IN THE FOOD TRUCK WORLD POTENTIALLY POISONING OUR RESIDENTS BECAUSE THINGS ARE NOT LOOKED AT IN HANDLING THIS FOOD? THEY HAD INSPECTORS COME DOWN FROM AUSTIN AND LOOK AT THINGS... >> THE STATE HAS A ORIGINAL OFFICE IN LEWISVILLE. -- LEWISVILLE. THAT DECISION HAS BEEN BAKING FOR A VERY LONG TIME. >> OF COURSE IT HAS! >> SO I'M HEARING YOU SAYING, IDENTICAL KITCHEN, FOOD TRUCK KITCHEN, RESTAURANT KITCHEN, I HAVE TO HAUL SOME OF THIS LET US. I CAN SHUT DOWN THE BRICK-AND-MORTAR, BUT I CANNOT SHUT DOWN THE FOOD TRUCK. >> WITH FOOD SAFETY CODES, THAT IS IT WITH TEXAS. >> SO THEY COULD POTENTIALLY POISON HUNDREDS BEFORE IT EVER GETS... >> THERE IS SOME VAGUE LANGUAGE IN THE STATUTE THAT UNDER EXTREME CASES WE WOULD. >> AS AN ASIDE I'D LOVE TO GIVE THEM SOME OPPORTUNITIES TO CLEAN IT UP. THIS SEEMS LIKE A REALLY LOW-HANGING FRUIT. >> AND MAYBE MORE CITIES WITH THE SAME PROBLEM. >> APPRECIATE THAT. >> I WAS JUST GOING TO MENTION, DID YOU ASK FOR FEEDBACK ON THIS AS FAR AS WHAT THE SUP IS TIED TO, THE FOOD BIT-- FOOD VENDOR OR OPERATING? CONSIDERING THAT YOU DON'T HAVE THE ABILITY TO REGULATE FOOD TRUCKS, AS FAR AS THESE THINGS GO, THEIR OPERATION AT ALL, WE HAVE NO MONEY, I WOULD SAY YOU ARE TYING AN SUV TO THE PROPERTY OVER WHAT YOU DO-- WHICH IS REPLACEMENT. >> IF YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE FOOD TRUCKS ON YOUR PROPERTY-- >> IT'S TIED TO THE PROPERTY-- >> IT IS THE BAD ACTORS. >> AND THAT'S WHAT I AM SAYING. SOME OF THESE PLACES, THEY DOUGHNUT TO KEEP THEIR TEMPERATURE, THEY DON'T HAVE TO KEEP THESE OTHER STANDARD. >> I AGREE, 100%. AND WE WERE TALKING ABOUT TYING THIS TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS NOT GOING ANYWHERE. SUP IS NOT GRANTED FOR LIFE. IF YOU DO NOT COMPLY WITH IT, YOU WILL BE REVOKED. SO I THINK WE HAVE SOME PROBLEMS THERE. >> BUT THAT MEANS THAT THEY COULD ROTATE THROUGH, AS LONG AS THEY HAVE A PERMIT WITH THE STATE. AS LONG AS THEY HAVE A SUP THAT ALLOWS THEM TO HAVE ONE FOOD TRUCK EVERY WEEKEND-- >> THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE IN COMPLIANCE. BECAUSE THEY ARE TRAVELING ON YOUR PROPERTY. YOU ALLOW THEM ON YOUR PROPERTY TO SELL THOSE POISON BURRITOS. >> THAT IS PART OF THE SUP PROCESS TYING IT TO THAT SPECIFIC-- THAT THEY WILL BRING SO-AND-SO ON TO THE PROPERTY. THAT COULD BE SOMETHING DIFFERENT AND WE COULD REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT. >> IT COULD BE DOWN TO THE OPERATOR. >> YES. >> I DON'T KNOW... [00:35:02] >> YOU ARE PLAYING RUSSIAN ROULETTE WITH HEALTH. >> IT FEELS VERY SORDID. WE HAVE OBLIGATIONS, BUT THERE IS NO WEIGHT THAT WE COULD ASK TO FUND THESE OPERATIONS WE DO. >> AND WE HAD THE SAME CONVERSATION WHEN WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT A COUPLE YEARS BACK. WOULD LOVE TO FIND SOME LEGAL LANGUAGE TO HELP IMPROVE THIS. >> ALL RIGHT. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? GOOD STUFF. THANK YOU. [A. Invocation - Mayor Pro Tem William Meridith] >> GOOD EVENING, AND WELCOME TO THE REGULAR SESSION OF THE LEWISVILLE CITY COUNCIL. WE HAVE A QUORUM. AT 7:00 P.M. FOR STEP ON THE AGENDA, WE HAVE THE INDICATION WITH MAYOR PRO TEM WILLIAM MERIDITH. >> JOIN ME IN A MOMENT OF SILENT CONTEMPLATION. [B. Pledge to the American and Texas Flags - Councilmember Brent Kuykendall] THANK YOU. >> COUNCILMEMBER? KUYKENDALL? I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG; I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THEE, TEXAS, ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE AND INDIVISIBLE. >> ALL RIGHT. [I. Closed Session] FIRST THING THAT WE HAVE TONIGHT IS WE HAVE TO STEP IN TO CLOSED SESSION. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEXAS CODE, REAL ESTATE PROPERTY ACQUISITION, AND [J. Reconvene] >> WE ARE GOING TO COME BACK IN TO REGULAR SESSION. IT IS 7:19 P.M. I'M GOING TO HAVE A MAYOR'S PREROGATIVE. AND SEVERAL FOLKS HAVE COME IN HERE AS PART OF THE VISITORS FOR HIM. SO IF YOU HAVE COME IN AS PART OF THE VISITORS FORUM, WE ARE GOING TO MOVE THAT UP SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO HANG AROUND. ALTHOUGH I KNOW YOU WOULD LOVE TO. THERE ARE A LOT OF PUBLIC HEARINGS COMING UP AND THEY ARE [D. Visitors Forum] REALLY EXCITING. SO WE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE YOUR PARTICIPATION. BUT WE UNDERSTAND IF YOU HAVE TO GET HOME. FIRST OF FOR THE VISITORS, SPEAKERS MUST ADDRESS HER COMMENTS TO THE MAYOR. SPEAKER SHOULD SPEAK CLEARLY AND STATE THEIR NAME AND PLACE OF RESIDENTS PRIOR TO REMARKS. THEY WILL HAVE 3 MINUTES FOR TESTIMONY. >> -- SPEAKERS MAKING PROFANE OR SLANDEROUS OR MARKS MAYBE REMOVED. UNAUTHORIZED MARSH FROM THE AUDIENCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEXAS ACT. THIS COUNCIL IS RESTRICTED FROM DISCUSSING OR TALKING ABOUT ITEMS LISTED ON THE AGENDA. ACTION CAN ONLY BE TAKEN AT A FUTURE MEETING. WE DO HAVE GROUPS, FIVE OR MORE WHO CAN USE A DESIGNATED SPOKESPERSON, AND THEY CAN GET UP TO 6 MINUTES BY DOING THAT. SO I BELIEVE THAT THAT HAS BEEN COMMUNICATED. AND WE HAVE SOMEBODY PERFORMING IN THAT WAY. SO I APPRECIATE THAT. BUT WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU. AND I AM GLAD THAT YOU WILL CAME OUT. SO THE FIRST GROUP THAT I HAVE, AND MY APOLOGIES. JAY, FRED-- I CAN'T GET THE LAST NAME OUT THERE. BUT THIS IS SPEAKING FOR THE GROUP REGARDING KING ARTHUR TRAFFIC CALMING. IF YOU COULD STATE YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENTS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. THERE WE GO. WE ARE GOING TO GET THAT MICROPHONE WORKING. >> CAN YOU HEAR ME? IS THAT BETTER? I JUST-- I DID NOT PLAN ON SPEAKING TODAY. BUT MY FRIENDS ELECTED ME 30 MINUTES AGO. SO HERE I AM. I LIVE AT 2400, KING ARTHUR. PRECISELY IN THE HEART OF THE TRAFFIC CALMING PROJECT. I DID NOT INTEND ON BEING HERE, NOR DID I INTEND ON BEING ON FACEBOOK. BUT THE LAST FEW WEEKS HAVE BEEN SOLID ON FACEBOOK. SO I FEEL LIKE IOWA TO MY FRIENDS TO BE HERE AND SPEAK. -- I FEEL LIKE I OWE IT TO MY FRIENDS TO BE HERE AND SPEAK. KING ARTHUR-- THIS AREA IS THE [00:40:09] EPICENTER OF TRAFFIC. IF YOU WERE TO GO BY OUR HOME, HE WOULD SEE IT IS A BLIND CURB AND IT'S ALWAYS BEEN AN ISSUE. PEOPLE ARE SPEEDING. MY DAUGHTERS ARE LITTLE. MY YOUNGEST, IN PARTICULAR, MY WIFE IS A TERRIBLE PARENT, SO SHE LET OUR DAUGHTER ESCAPE THROUGH THE FRONT DOOR TO GET OVER THE HILL. AND SHE RAN ACROSS THE STREET. AND A LADY SAW HER. GOD KNOWS WHERE SHE WAS GOING. BUT WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN COGNIZANT OF THE SPEED ON KING ARTHUR. SO WHEN THE TRAFFIC CALMING ADVISORY CAME ABOUT, WE WERE INTERESTED. WE EVEN ASKED TO HAVE THE SPEED BUMPS MOVED CLOSER TO OUR HOUSE AT ONE POINT. BUT, ANYWAY, THIS TRAFFIC CALMING PROJECT, WHEN IT WAS COMING IN I WAS LIKE THIS SOUNDS OKAY. BIKE LANES, THAT SOUNDS GREAT. AND WHEN THE CURB STARTED APPEARING, I CALL THEM CURBS, THE BIKE LANE BARRIERS, THESE THINGS, IN MY SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME, I WOULD SAY THEY ARE EXTREMELY DANGEROUS. DRIVING DOWN KING ARTHUR, LEAVING WORK AND COMING BACK, I CHANGED TWO TIRES ALREADY. I SAW TWO WRECKS IN ONE DAY. THIS IS AFTER WE REMOVED SOME OF THE FIRST PHASE THAT WAS REPLACED THERE. THERE ARE COUNTLESS TIRE MARKS AND EVERYTHING. I WOULD JUST-- LIKE I SAID EARLIER, I WANTED TO GIVE SHORT SOLUTIONS, OR I DON'T WANT TO COMPLAIN TOO MUCH, BUT I THINK WITH ALL THE RACKS, MOVING FORWARD I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THAT THIS BECOME AN AGENDA ITEM AT SOME POINT. BUT IF WE COULD COMMISSION A SAFETY REVIEW, THAT WOULD BE AN INTERESTING THOUGHT TO CONSIDER. CONSIDER THE REMOVAL OF THESE CURBS. THE BIKE LANE BARRIERS. LIKE LANES ARE GREAT. I CAN LIVE WITH BIKE LANES. THE BARRIERS ARE THE PROBLEM. I THINK YOU WILL SEE MORE AND MORE RACKS. WHEN I CALL THE POLICE, NONEMERGENCY LINE, THEY SAY ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT KING ARTHUR? I SAY YES. IT WAS KIND OF LIKE, OKAY, YOU ARE NOT THE FIRST. I THINK THERE IS SOMETHING INTERESTING THAT I HANDED TO YOU ON THAT PAPER, ABOUT LEWISVILLE NORTH CAROLINA, WHICH IS INTERESTING. THEY HAVE A TRAFFIC CALMING APPROVAL THRESHOLD. AND I THOUGHT I SHOULD PRINT THAT OUT AND BRING IT TO YOU. SO IF YOU GUYS HAVE TIME YOU CAN SHARE THAT WITH YOUR COUNCIL-- FELLOW COUNCIL MEMBERS. THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY. I APPRECIATE THE TIME. THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING. I HOPE WE CAN MOVE FORWARD. LEWISVILLE AND CASTLE HILLS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN GREAT PARTNERS. I LOVE THE VISION, I LOVE THE PARTNERSHIP. SO THANK YOU FOR THAT AS WELL. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. >> THANK YOU. NEXT UP, JAN WILDER. JAN, NAME AND CITY OF RECORD. >> MY NAME IS JAN WILDER. I'M AN 11 YEAR RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF LEWISVILLE. AND I THINK THAT WAS WELL SAID TO, SOME LOW TO JAY. I WANT TO THANK EACH OF YOU. YOU ARE IN THESE WALLS BECAUSE YOU CARE ABOUT OUR CITY. AS LONG AS I HAVE BEEN A RESIDENT, THAT HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED MANY, MANY TIMES OVER AND OVER WITH THE WONDERFUL CARE YOU HAVE GIVEN TO OUR COMMUNITY, TO THE SAFETY IN OUR COMMUNITY, AND TO HAVING HIGH STANDARDS. AND LISTENING TO THE FEEDBACK. SO WITH THAT I WANTED TO SHARE MORE CONCERNS WITH THE KING ARTHUR CALMING PROJECT. THE MAIN THING THAT I WOULD SAY IS THAT I KNOW THERE WERE RESIDENTS WHO CAME FORWARD WITH SAFETY CONCERNS. AND I APPRECIATE SO MUCH THAT THOSE WERE ADDRESSED IN A WELL-INTENTIONED WAY. SO, THANK YOU. I GUESS I WOULD JUST ASK THAT TODAY IS A NEW DAY. TODAY WE HAVE A NEW SET OF CIRCUMSTANCES ON KING ARTHUR, AND I THINK THAT TODAY WOULD BE A GOOD DAY TO BE DUE-- DO A SAFETY EVALUATION. AS MY FELLOW RESIDENT, JAY, SAID, WE ARE SEEING OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE THAT THERE ARE ACCIDENTS HAPPENING ON A DAILY BASIS. I WORRY ABOUT KIDS AND THE BICYCLE LANE, NEAR ALI'S. I WORRY ABOUT PEOPLE RUNNING INTO THE CURBS IN SUCH A WAY. WE ARE SEEING TIRES BEING DAMAGED PRETTY REGULARLY. AND IT'S NEXT LEVEL. I JUST ASK, YOU ACT IT-- YOU ACTED IN SUCH A CARING AND INTENTIONAL WAY BEFORE, LET US DO THAT AGAIN. AND LET'S LOOK AT IT SWIFTLY. GOD FORBID SOMETHING HAPPENS AND [00:45:02] SOMEONE GETS HURT. WE DON'T WANT THAT. AS A CONCERNED CITIZEN, AS SOMEBODY WHO KNOWS SOME OF YOU PERSONALLY AND HAS WORKED WITH YOU, THANK YOU FOR ALWAYS GIVING SUCH ATTENTION AND CARE TO OUR CITY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC SERVICE. ENDO-- I WOULD APPRECIATE IT IF ON BEHALF OF OUR NEIGHBORS, YOU COULD ACT SWIFTLY TO EVALUATE THE CURRENT SAFETY LEVEL OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU. >> CHRISTI? >> MY NAME IS CHRISTY SLAYTON. A 15 YEAR RESIDENT OF LEWISVILLE AND CASTLE HILLS. THE CITY OF LEWISVILLE HAS SPENT A HUGE AMOUNT OF TIME AND MONEY TOWARDS A PROJECT THAT HAS SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACTED SAFETY AND ASCETICS. ON A ROAD MOST RESIDENTS USE DAILY. IT WAS DEMONSTRATED THAT 85% OF DRIVERS 131 IN A 25 PER MILE HOUR ZONE AND NO SIGNIFICANT ASK SEDANS OR INJURIES WERE COMMON. WE WOULD LIKE TO BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION SOME KEY FACTS TO BE EVALUATED. IN NOVEMBER OF 2024, A PLAN FOR THE KING ARTHUR CALMING PROJECT WAS PRESENTED, HOWEVER THE FINAL EXECUTION DIFFERS GREATLY. THIS PROJECT HAS EXCEEDED PROPOSED AND APPROVED BUDGET. THE COMPLETED PROJECT HAS ALREADY CAUSED MULTIPLE FLAT TIRES PER WEEK AND CAR DAMAGE. SOME SAFETY CONCERNS TO MENTION. THE BUMP OUTS PROTRUDE IN TO THE DRIVING LANE. THE BIKE LANE IS ONLY 7 FEET 10 INCHES. AND THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDS A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET. IT HAS BEEN OBSERVED THAT TRUCKS TURNING INTO THE HILL CANNOT MAKE THE TURN WITHOUT DRIVING IN TO THE BIKE LANE. OUR COMMUNITY IS COLLECTING SIGNATURES TO PROPOSE AT MINIMUM REMOVING THESE CONCRETE BARRIERS BETWEEN THE BIKE LANE AND THE ROAD. THE COST OF REMOVING THESE SHOULD BE WEIGHTED AGAINST THE ONGOING COST OF REGULAR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS FOR THE BARRIERS AND REFLECTORS, AS WE ARE ALREADY SEEING 20% DAMAGED AFTER ONLY A MONTH OF INSTALLATION. WE ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE CITY OF LEWISVILLE'S INTENT WAS GOOD. BUT THE COMMUNITY FEELS THAT THIS WAS AN OVER CORRECTION. AND REQUESTING-- ARE REQUESTING THAT SAFETY ADJUSTMENTS BE MADE SO THE COMMUNITY CAN BE SAFER. THANK YOU. >> JOE? -- JILL? >> HELLO. MY NAME IS JILL SALZMAN, AND I HAVE LIVED IN CASTLE HILLS FOR ABOUT 26 YEARS. I WANT TO SAY THAT WE ARE ONE OF THE ORIGINALS. AND WE ALWAYS HAD ISSUES, I THINK IT'S WELL-KNOWN THAT THERE HAS BEEN SPEEDING. DOWN THE LINK AND KING ARTHUR. I GUESS I AM MORE OF A DATA PERSON. SO I KNOW THAT YOU HAD TO COLLECT DATA FOR SPEEDING, AND THE SAFETY ON KING ARTHUR. AND THAT WAS THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE ORIGINAL PROJECT. AND IN ORDER TO DO SOMETHING YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO COLLECT DATA TO PROVE THAT IT'S NOT IN PAID. THE DIFFERENCE IS THAT BEFORE WE WERE DEALING WITH SPEEDING, AND NOW WE ARE DEALING WITH DESTRUCTION, AS WELL AS, IN MY OPINION, HIGHER SAFETY CONCERNS. BECAUSE THERE IS NO FORGIVENESS FOR ANY OF THE DRIVERS. THE OTHER DAY, MY HUSBAND WAS TURNING IN AND THERE WAS A CAR COMING STRAIGHT AT HIM AND THERE WAS NOWHERE FOR HIM TO GO. SO HE HAD TO TURN ON THE BRAKES. MY DOG FLEW IN TO THE FRONT SEAT. AND HE WAS JUST WAITING FOR THAT CAR TO STOP. AND BECAUSE OF THE CONCRETE BARRIERS, THERE IS NO PADDING. THERE IS NOWHERE FOR A DRIVER TO GO. NO WAY TO SWERVE. SO I AM ASKING FOR-- I GUESS, THE LENGTH OF TIME FOR YOU GUYS TO COLLECT DATA TO MAKE SURE THAT IT IS JUSTIFIED COMPARED TO WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO GAIN FROM THE RESULTS TO WHAT WE ARE SEEING. AND THAT IS ALL. THANK YOU. >> APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. JOHN FERGUSON? >> HELLO, GUYS. MY NAME IS JOHN FERGUSON. I LIVE IN LEWISVILLE. I WANT TO START OUT BY SAYING THAT I'VE DONE PROJECTS ALL OVER DALLAS, FRISCO, LEWISVILLE, GARLAND. AND YOU GUYS DO A REALLY GOOD JOB OF WORKING WITH THE CITIZENS, TAKING INPUT AND IMPLEMENTING. I APPRECIATE THAT. I KNOW COUNCILOR KELLY WORKS VERY HARD AT THAT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THAT SAID, THE TRAFFIC COMING PROJECT IN CASTLE HILL, YOU GUYS BOTCHED IT. IT IS AWFUL. ASIDE FROM THE FACT THAT IT IS COMPLETELY UNSIGHTLY. YOU HAVE HANDICAPPED SPOTS IN FRONT OF MILLION-DOLLAR HOMES. IT'S COMPLETELY UNSIGHTLY. THERE IS A DANGER THAT HAS BEEN CREATED FROM THE BARRICADES, AND WE REALLY, TRULY, AS A COMMUNITY, COLLECTIVELY WE FEEL [00:50:02] LIKE THIS NEEDS TO GO BACK AND BE READDRESSED. SO, WHATEVER WE HAVE TO DO TO GET THAT BACK ON-- SOME SORT OF AGENDA, OR MOVING FORWARD WITH THE CITY TO FIGURE OUT A NEW SOLUTION, LET US HAD IN THAT DIRECTION. WE ARE ASKING FOR YOU GUYS TO DO THAT AS A COMMUNITY. THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE IT. >> THANK YOU. POSER ALTY COMMENT CARDS I HAVE. A QUICK SHOW OF HANDS. WHO IS HERE FROM THE CASTLE HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD? ALL RIGHT. I NEVER LOOK OVER AT THAT SIDE. YOU KNOW THAT. FIRST OF ALL, THANK YOU FOR TAKING TIME OUT OF YOUR BUSY SCHEDULE TO COME HERE. AND PARTICIPATE. TOO MUCH OF THIS STUFF HAPPENS IN A REALLY ANGRY FORUM. AND BEING ABLE TO COME OUT HERE AND HAVE FACE TO FACE AND KNOW THAT EVERYBODY HERE IS TRYING TO SOLVE PROBLEMS, I APPRECIATE THAT. WE WILL CONTINUE TO EVALUATE WHAT IS GOING ON. WE ARE GOING TO TAKE THIS INPUT AND WORK WITH IT. WE ARE DATA-DRIVEN AS WELL. SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE ARE DOING GOOD THINGS. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IF SOMEBODY SWERVES THAT THEY DO NOT HIT A KID ON A BIKE. SO WE HAVE THAT INITIAL CONCERN ABOUT SPEEDING, THAT IS STILL TOP OF MIND. I THINK THAT IS AN ISSUE IN THE CITY. BUT I DO NOT DISAGREE THAT THIS HAS CREATED A LOT OF-- WHAT I LIKE TO CALL "LOUD CARING." AND THAT IS GOOD. I APPRECIATE THAT. SO WE WILL CONTINUE TO TAKE A LOOK AT THIS. WE WILL HAVE STAFF REACH OUT, KEEP US IN THE LOOP, AND WE WILL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THIS. IT WILL TAKE TIME TO IDENTIFY WHERE AND IF WE CAN MAKE THOSE CHANGES. WE WILL HAVE TO TALK WITH STAFF [1. 26-4648 Public Hearing: Consideration of an Ordinance of the Lewisville City Council, Amending the Zoning Ordinance by Granting a Special Use Permit for Commercial Amusement (Outdoor) on Approximately 5.74 Acres Legally Described as Castle Hills Golf Course Block A, Lot 2B and a Portion of Lot 4R; Located Approximately 2,600 Feet South of the Intersection of Lady of the Lake Boulevard and The Lakes Boulevard and Approximately 860 Feet East of the Intersection of Royal Minister Boulevard and Ireland Avenue, and Zoned Planned Development-General Business Two (PD-GB-2) District; Providing for a Savings Clause, Repealer, Severability, Penalty, and an Effective Date; as Requested by McAdams, the Applicant on Behalf of CHGC LLC, the Property Owner. (Case No. 26-02-3-SUP)] ABOUT IT. THANK YOU. AND YOU GUYS ARE WELCOME TO STAY FOR THE REST OF THE MEETING. AND WITH THAT, WE ARE GOING TO MOVE ON TO ITEM C1. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY ORDINANCE... LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 2,600 FEET SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF LADY OF THE LAKE BOULEVARD AND THE LAKES BOULEVARD AND APPROXIMATELY 860 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROYAL MINISTER BOULEVARD AND IRELAND AVENUE, AND ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-GENERAL BUSINESS TWO (PD-GB-2) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE, REPEALER, SEVERABILITY, PENALTY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AS REQUESTED BY MCADAMS, THE APPLICANT ON BEHALF OF CHGC LLC, THE PROPERTY OWNER. THE LIKES OF CASTLE HILLS OPERATES A TENNIS FACILITY FEATURING SIX COURSES LOCATED WITHIN THE GOLF COURSE OF-- SOUTH OF LEYTE BOULEVARD. THE AREAS CONSTRUCTED FOR AREAS ANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF LEWISVILLE. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS PROPOSING THE EXPANSION OF THE FACILITY BECAUSE THE FACILITY PREDATES ANNEXATION, A MULTISTEP APPROVAL PROCESS IS REQUIRED TO BRING THE EXPANSION INTO COMPLIANCE WITH LEWISVILLE'S CURRENT OF ALLMAN STANDARDS. A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY WAS FIRST REZONED TO PD GENERAL BUSINESS ON JULY 626. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT NOW MUST BE APPROVED FOR THE EXPANDED COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT USE. AN ALTERNATIVE STANDARD TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM LIGHTING LEVEL OF 44.5 FOOT-CANDLES ON THE COURTS IS INCORPORATED AS PART OF THE ZONING PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH THIS AS YOU. WEST. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL 7-0 ON JUNE 2ND, .26. I DO HAVE A PRESENTATION FROM HANNAH HABER. AND I, HOW ARE YOU? >> I'M DOING WELL. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> JUST YOUR NAME AND CITY. >> HANNAH HABER. CITY OF LEWISVILLE. CAN YOU ALL SEE MY PRESENTATION? I THINK WE HAD THIS PROBLEM LAST TIME ALSO. >> WE SEE THAT. >> OKAY. THERE IT IS. THERE WE GO. >> OKAY. PERFECT. I AM HANNAH HABER. I'M HERE TO TALK ABOUT THE CASTLE HILLS COURT EXPANSION. AND REALLY QUICKLY, I KNOW THAT I WAS HERE TWO WEEKS AGO TALKING ABOUT THIS. BUT WE DID GET THE REZONING FOR THIS AREA. AND IT WAS PREVIOUSLY OUR 12, AND WE GOT IT APPROVED FOR NOW GB TWO. HERE IS THE PROJECT OVERVIEW. SHOWING WHERE THE PROPOSED COURTS WILL GO. AND THEN THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL PARKING. RIGHT NOW THERE ARE A LOT OF PEOPLE PARKING ON THE GRASS. SO WITH THESE ADDITIONAL COURTS WE ARE REQUESTING SOME ADDITIONAL PARKING SPOTS BE INSTALLED AS WELL. AND I KNOW LAST TIME WE KIND OF TALKED ABOUT DRAINAGE. SO I WANTED TO KIND OF BRING UP THE FEMA MAP AND SHOW YOU ALL WHERE THE PARKING IS GOING. WHICH A PORTION OF IT IS LOCATED IN THE ZONE AE FLOOD PLANE. AND I WANTED TO SHOW YOU ALL DEGRADED PLANS. WE HAVE SUBMITTED THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT. IT IS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW WITH THE CITY. AND THIS IS OUR GRADING PLAN THAT WE HAVE SUBMITTED FOR [00:55:01] SUBMITTAL. IT IS SHOWING BASICALLY ALL OF THE EXISTING DRAINAGE COMING SOUTH. AND IT IS GOING IN TO A SMALL LITTLE POND OVER THERE. AND THIS PARKING AREA IS MATCHING, AND WE ARE CONNECTING IN TO EXISTING GRADES. SO WE ARE NOT TRYING TO CHANGE WHERE THE WATER IS CURRENTLY GOING. IT IS MATCHING THE EXISTING GRADE. SO I KNOW THERE WAS MULTIPLE QUESTION. >> CAN I ASK A QUESTION ABOUT THAT QUICKLY? DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE HIGH WATER ELEVATION IS IN THAT FLOOD PLANE? >> I DO NOT. ACTUALLY, ON THIS MAP IT SHOWS-- 42? 42 I BELIEVE? THERE IS A LITTLE FLATLINE RIGHT HERE. I THINK IT IS 42. OKAY. THERE YOU GO. >> IS THAT THE ELEVATION? >> YES. THAT IS WHERE IT COULD FLOOD UP TO. 42-30. >> WITH THIS RATING IF WE HAPPENED TO HAVE A FLOOD EVENT AND THERE WAS WATER SITTING THERE, A GOOD CORNER OF THAT PARKING LOT COULD BE UNDERWATER? >> YES. AND I WANT TO SAY, WHEN IT DOES RAIN, THE COURTS ARE CLOSED AND THEY HAVE TO BE CLEANED AND DRIED FOR SAFETY REASONS. SO REALLY, FLOODING AND PONDING, IF IT DOES OCCUR, NO ONE IS PARKING UP HERE. NO ONE WILL BE PARKING APPEAR. IF IT WAS FLOODED. BUT I HAVE TALKED TO THE GENERAL MANAGER, AND HE HAS SAID THAT HE HAS NOT SEEN FLOODING IN THIS AREA FOR YEARS. SO I GUESS THE CONCERN OF IT, OF FLOODING AND ALL THAT, AT LEAST IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA IS A MAJOR CONCERN. BUT AGAIN, IF IT WAS TO FLOOD, NOT MANY PEOPLE WOULD BE OUT THERE. NOT MANY CARS. >> WE DID HAVE A LOOK AT THAT THIS MORNING. COUNCILMAN KELLY HAD A QUESTION ON IT AS WELL. AND HE LET US KNOW, THE ENGINEER, IF IT WAS DURING A 100 YEAR EVENT, IT WOULD BE A COUPLE OF INCHES, NOT FEET. JUST SO YOU HAVE THAT. >> JUST AS LONG AS WE ARE NOT WORRIED ABOUT CREATING A MASS AFTER THE WATER RECEDES. AND ALSO IT'S NOT IMPACTING THE INTEGRITY OF THE PAVEMENT. >> AND I WOULD SAY AGAIN THAT WE ARE CONNECTING IN TO THE EXISTING GRADE. SO THE INTENT IS TO NOT CHANGE THE FLOW BY ANY MEAN-- ANY MEANS, OR CHANGE WHERE THE WATER IS GOING. WHICH IS CURRENTLY IN TO THAT SOUTHERN PUMP DOWN THEIR. >> AND WE GO TO SLIDE FIVE, PLEASE? >> ABSOLUTELY. THIS ONE? >> THERE WE GO. MY CONCERN WAS MAINLY IF IT FLOODED, IS IT GOING TO GO BACK TO THINGS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE CLUB? FROM WHAT I CAN TELL IS THAT IT'S FAR ENOUGH AWAY THAT MY CONCERNS ARE ALLEVIATED. I DON'T SEE HOW THIS WOULD IMPACT ANY OF THESE HOUSING STRUCTURES. IS ACCURATE? AS FAR AS YOU CAN TELL? >> YES. AND I WOULD SAY THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARE OUTSIDE OF THE FLOOD PLANE. SO WE ARE NOT TRYING TO IMPACT THAT BY ANY MEANS, WHERE PEOPLE WILL BE PLAYING AND LOOKING AT THAT. >> AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING SITE PLAN PROCESS, THAT IS NOT WHERE WE ARE YET, RIGHT? BUT THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE SOME SORT OF INTENTION OR SOMETHING? THAT IS DOWN THE ROAD? THAT IS NOT RIGHT NOW? >> YES. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH. >> THANK YOU. I HAVE SOME RESIDENTS REQUESTING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM IN SUPPORT. FIRST UP, MIKE. ALL RIGHT. STEVEN? >> MY NAME IS STEVEN TRAN. RESIDENT OF LEWISVILLE. RESIDENT OF CASTLE HILLS. ALSO A MEMBER OF THE LAKES OF CASTLE HILLS GOLF AND TENNIS CLUB. I WANTED TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THE SPECIAL USAGE PERMIT THAT HANNAH TALKED ABOUT. BUT I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO ASK FOR THE CLUB TO HAVE SOME METONYMY TO BALANCE THE HOMEOWNERS WISHES, AND THE MEMBERS OF THE CLUB. IN REGARDS TO THE HOURS OF OPERATION. FOR EXAMPLE THIS WEEK IT IS OVER 100 DEGREES. SUNSET IS AT 830. AND TO HAVE THE LIGHTS IN THE CLUB SHUT DOWN AT 9:00 SOUNDS A LITTLE-- SOUNDS SILLY. [01:00:06] I THINK THE TENNIS COURTS WERE BUILT THERE AND THE LIGHTS WERE BUILT THERE BEFORE THE HOMES WERE. AND IT IS LIKE LIVING ON A GOLF COURSE AND THEN COMPLAINING ABOUT GOLF BALLS IN YOUR YARD. IT'S KIND OF LIKE YOU KNEW WHAT YOU SIGNED UP FOR WHEN YOU BOUGHT THE HOUSE. AND I THINK THAT THAT IS WHERE SOME OF THE PUSHBACK IS, IN TERMS OF THE HOURS OF OPERATION, IN TERMS OF THE LIGHTS. AND I THINK THAT 10:00 P.M. IS A RESPECTFUL TIME TO THE HOMEOWNERS. ON SOMETHING ANALOGOUS, BUT NOT EXACTLY LEWISVILLE, BUT AGASSI HOLLAND PLANO IS BUILT RIGHT NEXT TO-- LEGACY HALL IN PLANO IS BUILT RIGHT NEXT TO TOWNHOUSES. THEY PLAY MUSIC AT HUNDREDS OF DECIBELS TO WITHIN 50 YARDS OF THEIR VENUE UP TO 10:00 P.M. SO I THINK THAT TENNIS COURTS PROVIDE A MORE CALMING AND PEACEFUL ATMOSPHERE. BUT I SUPPORT THE SPECIAL USAGE PERMIT. BUT I'M JUST ASKING FOR SOME AUTONOMY IN TERMS OF HOURS OF OPERATION. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. WILLIAM? >> HELLO EVERYBODY, HELLO MR. MAYOR. I DID NOT PLAN TO SPEAK TO ANYBODY. I JUST GOT OFF WORK. I GOT HERE AS FAST AS I CAN. I WANTED TO EXPRESS MY SUPPORT FOR THE PROJECT. I AM ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE THAT JOINED THE CLUB FOUR WERE FIVE YEARS AGO. AND I TAUGHT MY DAUGHTER HOW TO PLAY TENNIS THERE. I WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DO THAT WITHOUT THOSE COURTS. I'VE BEEN ABLE TO DO THAT THE LAST FIVE YEARS AND I APPRECIATE THE CLUB ALLOWING ME TO DO THAT. I STRONGLY ENCOURAGE THE COUNCIL TO LET THE CLUB DECIDE THE HOURS OF OPERATION, BECAUSE I THINK IT IS IMPORTANT FOR PEOPLE. ESPECIALLY MY AGE. IT IS TOUGH TO PLAY TENNIS WHEN THE SUN IS OUT. WHEN THE SUN GOES DOWN, YOU CAN TURN THE LIGHTS ON AND IT'S A NICE ATMOSPHERE AND WE CAN PLAY AND GET A GOOD WORKOUT. THAT'S ALL I WANTED TO SAY. I JUST WANTED TO EXPRESS MY SUPPORT FOR THE PROJECT. >> CAN I ASK YOU A COUPLE QUESTIONS BEFORE YOU GO? WE MET A COUPLE DAYS AGO. I'M CURIOUS, WHEN YOU THINK OF THE HOURS OF OPERATION FOR THAT CLUB, WHAT ARE THE BUSIEST TIMES DURING THE SUMMER? >> BUSIEST TIMES DURING THE SUMMER IS PROBABLY THE LADIES IN THE MORNING. I THINK THEY ARE MOSTLY USING THE CLUB AT THAT TIME. FOR THE MEN, WE PLAY A LOT AT NIGHT. WE WORK. AND THAT IS WHEN WE ARE ABLE TO PLAY. SO CUTTING IT OFF AT 9:00 HAS HURT US THIS SUMMER. WE HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO PLAY AS MUCH AND IT'S HURTING THE GROUP. >> THANK YOU. YES, MAN? >> ARE YOU ONE OF THE NEIGHBORS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE ONE OF THE STIPULATIONS WAS THE 9:00? >> I DO NOT LIVE IN THE RESERVES OR IN THAT SPECIFIC COMMUNITY. I LIVE DOWN THE STREET ON CONSTANTINE. BUT SINCE I HAVE BEEN THERE THOSE COURTS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN THERE. THE PICKLEBALL HAS BEEN THERE, THE LIGHTS HAVE BEEN ON. WE PLAY UNTIL 10:00 FOR THE LAST FIVE YEARS. >> BUT THEY HAVE NOT BEEN THAT CLOSE TO THE NEIGHBORS? B THEY HAVE ALWAYS BEEN. THE PICKLEBALL COURTS ARE A LITTLE FURTHER BACK, BUT THE TENNIS BALL COURTS HAVE BEEN THERE SINCE I'VE BEEN THERE. AND THOSE HOUSES HAVE BEEN THERE SINCE-- I THINK PREDATING THE HOUSES. I THINK THOSE COURTS WERE THERE BEFORE THE HOUSES WERE THERE. SO I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY ANYONE THAT WOULD LIVE IN THAT COMMUNITY OR THOSE HOUSES WOULD COMPLAIN ABOUT THOSE DECIBELS. BECAUSE THEY WERE HERE WHEN THEY BOUGHT THEM. >> COULD YOU PULL UP THE MAP THAT SHOWS THE NEW COURT VERSUS THE EXISTING ONE? >> WE COULD PULL UP HANNA'S PRESENTATION. >> I WAS LOOKING FOR YOU. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. WE APPRECIATE YOU. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT LIGHTS ON THE GREEN OR THE RED WOULD BE THE NEW LIGHTS. THAT SPEAKS TO THOSE COMMENTS ABOUT THE LOCATION. [01:05:11] >> OKAY. SO THE NEW LIGHTS ARE FURTHER AWAY FROM THE RESIDENCES? >> ARE THE RESIDENTS, ARE THE ANY RESIDENTS THAT ARE HERE THAT HAD THESE ISSUES? ARE THEY HERE? OR ARE THESE MEMBERS-- >> EVERYONE HERE SIGNED UP AS A NEIGHBOR. >> THESE NEIGHBORS WERE IN FAVOR BUT THEY WANTED SOME PROVISIONS. >> YES. >> BUT NONE OF THEM ARE HERE. >> IT DOES LOOK LIKE THAT IS THE CASE. >> THANK YOU FOR PULLING THAT BACKUP. I APPRECIATE IT. DAVID GERRARD? MR. GERRARD, ARE YOU-- ARE YOU THE ONE THAT WAS REFERRED TO EARLIER? OKAY. THANK YOU FOR THAT. >> DAVID GERRARD, LEWISVILLE RESIDENT, CASTLE VO-- CASTLE HILL RESIDENT. FIRST I WANT TO SAY THAT I STRONGLY SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT. THE CLUB HAS OUTGROWN IT'S CURRENT TENNIS FACILITY. MORE COURTS ARE NEEDED FOR LEADS, TEAMS AND LESSONS. IMPROVING THE TENNIS AND PICKLEBALL FACILITIES WILL HELP THE CLUB KEEP PACE WITH THE GOLF FACILITIES TO STRENGTHEN IT'S REPUTATION AND ADD VALUE TO THE SAILS COMMUNITY. EVEN IF THE COUNCIL DISAGREES ABOUT THE HOURS, I WOULD STILL ASK YOU TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT. OUR SECOND REQUEST IS THAT THE COUNCIL NOT APPROVE A BLANKET 9:00 P.M. SHUTDOWN ON EVERY COURT. PLEASE RETAIN 10:00 P.M. IS THE MAXIMUM OPERATING TIME AND ALLOW CLUB MANAGEMENT TO DECIDE WHICH COURTS CAN BE USED RESPONSIBLY BETWEEN 9:00 AND 10:00 P.M. THE COURTS ARE NOT ALL SITUATED THE SAME. WHICH WE SO MAPPED UP THERE BEFORE. COURTS ONE, TWO, THREE AND FOUR ARE THE EXISTING TENNIS COURTS THAT HAVE BEEN THERE FOR MANY YEARS. THOSE ARE THE COURTS THAT ARE CLOSEST TO THE ACTUAL HOMES. COURTS FIVE AND SIX WERE BUILT IN 2021 APPROXIMATELY. AND THE NEW COURTS, SEVEN AND EIGHT, ARE PROBABLY FURTHER AWAY FROM THE HOUSES. SO THE TWO SETS OF COURTS BEING BUILT ARE THE FURTHEST AWAY. SO THEY ARE NOT ALL SITUATED THE SAME AS FAR AS APPROXIMATING DISTANCE TO THE HOMES. TURNING THE LIGHTS OFF ON THOSE FOUR CLOSEST COURTS WOULD MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE IN IMPROVING THE RESIDENTS EXPERIENCE OVER WHAT THEY HAVE IN PLACE RIGHT NOW WITH THE 10:00 P.M. THE OTHER COURTS THAT ARE MUCH FURTHER AWAY, AND THOSE PICKLEBALL COURTS ARE BUFFERED BY TREES AND THE CLUBHOUSE. THE CLUBHOUSE HAS REDUCED THE PROPOSED LIGHTING, ADDING SHIELDS AND PROVIDING LITTLE LIGHT. THE EXISTING COURTS AND 10:00 P.M. HOURS WERE IN PLACE BEFORE THE NEARBY HOMES WERE BUILT. ANYBODY BUYING THOSE HOMES COULD SEE THAT THEY WERE MOVING NEXT TO AN ESTABLISHED LICENSED TENNIS FACILITY WITH EVENING ACTIVITIES. THEIR CONCERNS ARE A CONSIDERATION, BUT THEY SHOULD NOT LIMIT THE LONG-TERM AMENITIES FOR THE BROAD MEMBERSHIP. I VERIFIED THE COURTS LOCATED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD NEXT TO THE VILLAGE SHOPS ARE LOCATED ABOUT TEN TO 15 FEET FROM NEARBY CONDOS. THOSE ARE RESERVED BULL UNTIL ABOUT 10:00 P.M. I CHECKED THE CITY OF LEWISVILLE TODAY AND PICKLEBALL AND TENNIS COURTS CAN BE RESUMED UNTIL 10:00 P.M. ALTHOUGH THERE ARE COURTS IN SPRINGWOOD THAT ARE ONLY ABOUT 80 TO 85 FEET TO THE CLOSEST COURT. CASTLE HILL ALLOWS 10:00 P.M.-- CASTLE HILL COMMUNITY ALLOWS 10:00 P.M. LEWISVILLE ALLOWS 11:00 P.M. WHY SHOULD THE LAKES BE FORCED TO CLOSE AT 9:00 P.M. WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR EVERY COURT TO STAY LIVING UNTIL 9:00 AT NIGHT. THAT MAY HAPPEN ONLY ONCE OR TWICE A WEEK DURING SUMMER AND RARELY IN WINTER. ACCESS MATTERS BECAUSE OF THE TEXAS HEAT, WORK SCHEDULES AND LEAD MANAGEMENT THAT DOESN'T USUALLY BEGIN UNTIL SEVEN OR 730. PLEASE APPROVE THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT. I ASK YOU TO REMOVE THE 9:00 P.M. CONDITION OF THE PERMIT AND RE-- RECLAIM TEN PMS THE CLOSING TIME, AND ALLOW THE CLUB TO MANAGE THE FURTHER BUFFERING OF THE CLUB. >> SEAN BURKE HE? >> GOOD EVENING. [01:10:04] MY NAME IS SEAN. I AM A RESIDENT OF LEWISVILLE AND A MEMBER OF THE LAKES AT CASTLE HILLS. I HAVE TWO REQUEST RELAY. I STRONGLY ASK YOU TO PROVE THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT. OUR TENNIS FACILITIES HAVE OUTGROWN-- HAVE BEEN OUTGROWN. THE ADDITIONAL COURTS WILL SUPPORT MEMBERS, LEAGUE PLAY, ACTIVITIES AND HELP LAKES ONE OF THE PREMIER AMENITIES AT CASTLE HILLS. SECOND I ASK THAT YOU NOT PERMANENTLY REQUIRE EVERY COURT TO SHUTDOWN AT 9:00 P.M. AND INSTEAD ALLOW THE CLUB TO MANAGE THEIR OWN OPERATIONS WITH A 10:00 P.M. MAXIMUM CLOSING TIME. ON A PERSONAL NOTE, MY FAMILY AND I ALL PLAY TENNIS. MY WIFE AND I BOTH WORK. SO BY THE TIME THAT WE GET DONE DURING THE WEEK, IT COULD BE 6:00 OR LATER. MY SON IS A TENNIS PLAYER IN HIGH SCHOOL, AND HE IS PART OF THE BAND. SO THERE IS NO TELLING WHEN HE COMES HOME. AND MY YOUNGER SON IS GOING TO KILLIAN, AND WILL BE PART OF THE TENNIS PROGRAM PROBABLY IN YEARS TO COME. SO FOR US AS A FAMILY UNIT TO BE ABLE TO GO OUT AND PLAY AT 9:00 P.M. IS PROHIBITIVE. WE NEED THOSE EXTRA HOURS ON MANY OCCASIONS TO ENJOY THAT FAMILY TIME AND TENNIS. THANK YOU. >> I DO NOT HAVE ANY OTHER WRITTEN COMMENTS. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS OPEN. ARE THERE ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FOR COUNCIL. WE HAVE RICHARD E. LUEDKE WE. >> DO WE NEED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND HAVE OUR DISCUSSION? >> WE CAN CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND HAVE OUR DISCUSSION. >> I MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. >> SECOND. >> I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY YOUR BOAT WHEN THE VOTING SCREEN COMES UP. >> I DON'T GET THE VOTE. THERE IS NO VOTING SCREEN FOR ME. >> SUCCESS! >> RIGHT NOW I HAVE FIVE YES, ONE VERBAL YES. 6-0. THERE IT IS. >> SOMEONE GAVE IT TO ME. >> YOU ARE JUST LOOKING FOR ALL THAT ATTENTION, PATRICK. COME ON. [LAUGHTER] >> I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THIS MOTION. THIS MOTION CURRENTLY, AS IS, IF WE WERE TO APPROVE AS IT IS WRITTEN IN THE CAPTION, THAT WOULD INCLUDE THE CLOSURE AT 9:00 P.M. DID I SEE SOMETHING THAT SAYS THAT THE LIGHTS ARE ALREADY TURNING OFF AT 9:00 P.M.? >> I WILL HAVE HANNAH ADDRESS THAT QUESTION. >> THAT IS YES. THEY ARE ALREADY BEING TURNED OFF AT 9:00 P.M. >> AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CLUB. >> YES. >> THE ELECTRICIAN HAS FIXED IT TO WHERE IT'S GOING ON AT 9:00 P.M. ALREADY. BUT THAT CAN BE ADJUSTED? >> YES. >> AND ANOTHER DISCUSSION ABOUT A GATE. BUT THAT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS MOTION? OKAY. SO I THINK THERE HAS BEEN SOME VERY GOOD POINTS MADE TONIGHT ABOUT THE OPERATING HOURS. I THINK, FOR ME PERSONALLY, I THINK THE FACT THAT THE COURTS THAT ARE CLOSEST TO THE RESIDENCES WERE ACTUALLY THERE PRIOR TO THOSE HOUSES BEING THERE. SO I AGREE, WHAT DO I ALWAYS SAY, DO YOUR DUE DILIGENCE. SO IF IT WAS, THOSE HOURS WERE OKAY, WHENEVER THEY BOUGHT THE HOUSE, THEN I WOULD SAY THAT THEY ARE OKAY NOW. I DO THINK THAT THIS GIVES THE CLUB THE ABILITY TO SHIFT. HEY, WE ONLY HAVE ENOUGH USE FOR THREE OR FOUR COURTS RIGHT NOW. LET'S MOVE THEM FURTHER AWAY FROM THE RESIDENCES. SO I AM FINE WITH LEAVING NOT TO THE CLUBS DISCRETION. SO I WOULD ACTUALLY-- I'M NOT QUITE SURE HOW WE WOULD DO THAT. IF I WANTED TO CHANGE THAT PROVISION IN THE CAPTION. FROM 9:00 P.M. TO 10:00 P.M. >> JUST ELIMINATE THE TIME ALTOGETHER? >> WHILE SHE IS LOOKING THAT UP, I WILL SECOND WHAT COUNCILMEMBER IS SAYING. GRADE POINTS BROUGHT UP. I WENT AND WATCHED THE PROPERTIES, AND I DON'T SEE ANY ADDITIONAL HARM FROM THIS CHANGE. SO I AGREE WITH YOU. >> HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE AT THE MEETING HELD BY MCADAMS? >> TWELVE TO 13. SOMEWHERE AROUND THERE. >> WAS THAT FROM INDIVIDUAL HOMES REORDER 12 INDIVIDUAL PEOPLE? >> TWELVE PEOPLE SIGNED UP AND THEIR NAMES POPPED UP ON A ZOOM LINK. THERE COULD HAVE BEEN MORE BEHIND THE SCREEN, I JUST DID NOT SEE THEM. BUT WE COUNTED THE NAMES. >> COULD THERE HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE PEOPLE THAT WERE SIGNED IN THAT WERE PROCESSING FAMILY? [01:15:07] >> COULD HAVE BEEN. >> I'M TRYING TO GAGE HOW MANY HOMES WERE REPRESENTED BY THAT. >> WHEN I DID THE 12 TO 13, IT WAS HOW MANY PEOPLE, THEIR PHYSICAL NAMES WERE ON ZOOM. THAT'S HOW I CALCULATED IT. IT COULD HAVE BEEN MORE. >> IT COULD HAVE BEEN UP TO 13 HOMES. >> YES. THANK YOU. >> CAN YOU BRING THAT PICTURE BACK UP AGAIN? >> YES. >> IT'S ON MY SCREEN. IT MAY NOT BE ON YOURS. >> THERE WE GO. >> ALL THE EXISTING WAS THE ONLY ONE BY THE RESIDENTS. THAT'S A GOOD VISUAL, BY THE WAY. HAVE YOU HAD ANY PROBLEMS WITH PEOPLE ON THE COURTS AFTER HOURS? [INDISCERNIBLE] >> THIS GOES TO THE GATE ISSUE. PUTTING A GATE IN MIGHT KEEP A CAR OUT. BUT WILL KEEP THE KIDS OUT? AND THE PEOPLE UTILIZING IT AFTER HOURS? [INDISCERNIBLE] >> ARE EACH OF THESE COURTS LIGHTED INDIVIDUALLY ON SEPARATE CIRCUITS? >> CAN I HAVE YOU COME UP? SORRY ABOUT THAT. AND CAN I GET YOUR NAME AND CITY. >> TIM. I LIVE IN GRAND TEXAS AND WORK IN CASTLE HILL. >> WE WON'T HOLD THAT AGAINST YOU. >> ALL THOSE LIGHTS ARE ON A BANK WHERE YOU CAN MANUALLY TURN THEM ON AND SET A TIMER. SO WE PRIMARILY SET THE TIMERS, AND THAT CONTROLS ON THE LIGHTS COME ON AND OFF. AT TIMES THERE ARE GLITCHES, BUT FOR THE MOST PART, IT'S WORKING PRETTY WELL. IF IT GETS DARK EARLY IN THE DAY BECAUSE OF SOME OVERCAST SKIES, WE CAN TURN THOSE ON. -- THEN WE MAKE SURE THE STAFF TURNS HIM OFF AND PUTS THEM ON AUTO SHUT OFF. SO THAT IS SOMETHING WE ARE WORKING ON. WE HAVE HAD SOME GLITCHES IN THERE. AGAIN, THE IDEA, WHEN WE EXPAND THE FOOTPRINT DOWN THERE, IS TO HAVE MORE PEOPLE WORKING THERE. WE WILL NOT HAVE THE LIGHTS TURNED ON WHEN THEY HAVE A COURT RESERVATION FROM NINE TO TEN. WE JUST DON'T WANT TO BURN ELECTRICITY WITH NOBODY PLAYING. AND AS SOME OF THE MEMBERS SUPPORTIVE OF IT SAID, THERE IS SOME SEASONALITY IN THERE. IT'S A HOT SUMMER. WE DON'T HAVE A LOT OF MEMBERS PLAYING FROM 10:00 IN THE WINTERTIME BECAUSE IT'S COLD OUT, AND THEY CAN PROBABLY PLAY EASIER IN THE WINTERTIME IN THE COLDER MONTHS. SO THOSE LIGHTS ARE FULLY AUTOMATED WHEN WE TURN THEM ON. BUT THEY CAN BE MANUAL. THEY ARE INDIVIDUAL SO WE CAN TURN ON AND OFF WHATEVER WE WANT. >> THE REASON WE DON'T WANT THIS BROUGHT BACK UP AGAIN-- COUNCIL GOT ME THINKING ABOUT THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE VERSUS THE NUMBER OF HOUSES. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S SIX RESIDENTS, SIX HOUSES RIGHT THERE, APPROXIMATE TO THIS AREA. BUT I WASN'T SURE UNTIL I SAW THAT. THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT UP. >> BUT IF THEY ARE NOT IMPACTED NOW... >> THAT IS RIGHT. >> I DO WANT TO STATE THAT THE TIME CHANGE WAS NOT FROM THE [01:20:04] RESIDENTS. IT WAS JUST SOMETHING THAT WE WERE THINKING WOULD HELP AND BENEFIT THEM. THAT WAS NOT A DECISION THAT CAME FROM THEM. THEY JUST WANTED THE LIGHTS TURNED OFF AT TEN. SO THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT CAME FROM THEM. AND IT IS JUST THE CONCERN OF 10:00 P.M., LIGHTS OFF. SO I DO WANT TO THROW LIGHT OUT THERE. >> AND QUITE FRANKLY WE TALKED ABOUT THIS BRIEFLY. IT'S DOING WHAT THEY NEED TO BE DOING. TO PROVIDE FOR THEIR NEIGHBORS AND THEIR CONSTITUENCY. I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THEM BEING THE SCAPEGOAT IF THAT'S WHAT THEY NEED TO BE. LET THEM TAKE CARE OF IT. ALL RIGHT. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> I MOVED TO APPROVE THE ORDINANCE AS SET FORTH FROM THE CAPTION, WITH THE CHANGE, THE HOURS OF OPERATION AND CONDITIONS ALLOWABLE FOR THEM TO BE OPEN UNTIL 10:00 P.M. >> I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE VOTE. >> AND SOMEONE VOTE FOR ME AGAIN? >> VOTING PASSES 6-0. THANK YOU ALL FOR COMING OUT. WE APPRECIATE YOU. ALL RIGHT, ITEM C2. [2. 26-4653 Public Hearing: Consideration of an Ordinance of the Lewisville City Council, Amending the Zoning Ordinance by Rezoning Approximately 7.082 Acres of Land, out of the S.M. Hayden Survey, Abstract Number 537 and Including Hurst Industrial Park Addition, Block A, Lot 1; Located at 1918 and 1926-1954 East State Highway 121 Business; From Light Industrial (LI) District Zoning to Planned Development Multi-Family-Three (PD-MF-3) District Zoning; Correcting the Official Zoning Map and List of Planned Development Districts; Preserving all Other Portions of the Zoning Ordinance; Determining That the Zoning Amendment Herein Made Promotes the Health, Safety, and General Welfare of the City; Providing for a Savings Clause, Repealer, Severability, a Penalty, and an Effective Date; as Requested by ZoneDev, the Applicant, on Behalf of CP Lewisville MF, LLC. and Joey & Daphne D Hurst, the Property Owners (26-04-3-PZ).] PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE LEWISVILLE CITY COUNCIL, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY REZONING APPROXIMATELY 7.082 ACRES OF LAND, OUT OF THE S.M. HAYDEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 537 AND INCLUDING HURST INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION, BLOCK A, LOT 1; LOCATED AT 1918 AND 1926-1954 EAST STATE HIGHWAY 121 BUSINESS; FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI) DISTRICT ZONING TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MULTI-FAMILY-THREE (PD-MF-3) DISTRICT ZONING; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND LIST OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE ZONING AMENDMENT HEREIN MADE PROMOTES THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE, REPEALER, SEVERABILITY, A PENALTY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AS REQUESTED BY ZONEDEV, THE APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF CP LEWISVILLE MF, LLC. AND JOEY & DAPHNE D HURST, THE IN 2023, CHAPARRAL PARTNERS ACQUIRED TWO AUTOMOTIVE SALVAGE YARDS LOCATED WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE AT 1910 AND 1914 EAST STATE HIGHWAY 121 BUSINESS, SUCCESSFULLY REDEVELOPING THE PROPERTIES INTO A MULTIFAMILY COMMUNITY. BUILDING ON THE SUCCESS OF THAT PROJECT, THE APPLICANT IS NOW SEEKING A SIMILAR REDEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1918 AND 1926-1954 EAST STATE HIGHWAY 121 BUSINESS. THE SUBJECT SITE SITS DIRECTLY EAST OF THEIR PREVIOUS MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND CURRENTLY OPERATES UNDER SIMILAR INDUSTRIAL/SALVAGE/AUTOMOTIVE USES. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL (6-0) ON JUNE 23 >> I DO HAVE SOME-- I HAVE SPENCE MILLER HERE TO PRESENT. AND NAME AND CITY FOR THE RECORD. >> SPENCE MILLER. DALLAS TEXAS. FIRST OF ALL, I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE AND ALLOWING US TO PRESENT OUR PROJECT. SOME FAMILIAR FACES. SOME NEW FACES FROM YEARS AGO WHEN WE BROUGHT OUR FIRST PROJECT FORWARD. THAT ONE WAS A GREAT SUCCESS. SO WE DECIDED TO CONTINUE WITH THAT. SO I WILL RUN THROUGH THIS PRESENTATION QUICK. LET US SEE. THERE WE GO. REAL QUICK, OUR COMPANY STARTED IN 2021, WE ARE MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS ACROSS TEXAS AND THE SOUTHEAST. A VISUAL FOR YOU ON WHAT YOU JUST DESCRIBED, MAYOR. THE EXISTING PHASE NEXT-DOOR WHERE WE BOUGHT THE PARCELS, THE LIGHT BLUE ON THE RIGHT IS THE PROPERTY WE ARE TALKING ABOUT NOW. AND AS OF LAST WEEK, WE ARE OFFICIALLY OWNERS OF THE PARCEL ON THE LEFT SIDE. THAT LIGHT BLUE SCREEN THEY ARE. SO WE ARE EXCITED TO BUILD THE APARTMENTS. BECAUSE I AM NOT AN INDUSTRIAL STORAGE OPERATOR. LIKE WE HAVE DISCUSSED, HERE IS ANOTHER VISUAL OF THE SITE. THE EXISTING USES. AUTO SALVAGE AND INDUSTRIAL STORAGE. AS WITH THE SITE NEXT-DOOR, WE ARE EXCITED TO SEE THIS PARCEL CLEANED UP. AS IT STANDS FOR THE EXISTING PROJECT, AND PER THE LARGER AREA, JUST TO CLEAN IT UP. WE SEE THIS IS THE LAST PIECE TO BRING IT TOGETHER. QUICK DESCRIPTION ON THE PROJECT. WE HAVE 34-STORY BUILDINGS. ABOUT 265 UNITS ON 7 ACRES. SIMILAR PROPERTY AMENITIES WILL BE OFFERED NEXT-DOOR. AND AN ENHANCED AMENITY PACKAGE. WE WILL ALSO HAVE SOME OPEN SPACES AROUND THE SITE. SO A LOT OF UPGRADES TO THE [01:25:02] PROJECT GIVEN WHAT WE WERE ABLE TO DO SUCCESSFULLY. SAME GOES FOR THE UNIT AMENITIES. THIS WILL BRING THE UPGRADES FOR THE UNIT AMENITY OPERATIONS FOR THE RESIDENTS. THIS IS A STAND-ALONE PROJECT. SO THERE ARE SOME SIMILARITIES, BUT ALSO A LOT OF DIFFERENCES. WE WANT THE FOCUS HERE TO BE A BIT MORE OF A URBAN EDGE AND DESIGN. WE ARE PROUD OF WHAT WE ARE SHOWING. THIS IS AN INTERIOR ELEVATION OF THE POOL COURTYARD. IT IS ALMOST TWICE AS BIG AS WHAT WAS NEXT-DOOR. WHICH IS EXCITING THAT WE CAN OFFER THAT FOR LOCAL RESIDENTS. THESE ARE ELEVATIONS, AND THIS IS OUR ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS EXHIBIT. WE ARE ASKING FOR THE SAME ALTERNATIVE STANDARD THAT WE PROPOSED ON THE FIRST DAY BE BUILT. WITH THAT I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> WHEN I FIRST LOOKED AT THIS ONE OF MY CONCERNS MONTH SETBACKS. NOTHING MAKES A CITY FEEL MORE THAN A SETBACK FROM THE ROAD. WHEN I SAW 15 SETBACKS FROM 121, THAT'S IN ADDITION TO THAT AREA RIGHT? >> WE HAVE A 25-FOOT SETBACK FROM 121. REDUCED SETBACK IS DOWN. BUT THAT IS A SETBACK IN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING. >> THANK YOU. >> OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? >> SO I GUESS THE ONLY THOUGHT PROCESS THAT I HAD HERE, WE HAD LOOKED AT THE SEWER, RIGHT? I KNOW WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A CHANGE IN THE DENSITY. SO WE HAVE TO LOOK THROUGH THE SEWER AND MAKE SURE THE EXISTING SYSTEM HAS CAPACITY TO HANDLE THIS INCREASED DENSITY, RIGHT? >> YES, WE HAVE LOOKED AT THAT. >> I WANTED TO GET THAT ON THE RECORD. AND I WANTED TO SAY THAT I REALLY APPRECIATE, I DON'T REMEMBER HOW MANY YEARS IT HAS BEEN SINCE YOU CAME THROUGH PHASE ONE. THREE YEARS? OKAY. I KNOW YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT DOING THIS PIECE IN TIME AS WELL. AND YOU HAVE DEDICATED YOURSELF TO MAKING THIS HAPPEN. SO THANK YOU FOR STICKING WITH IT. I KNOW THAT LITTLE PIECE THERE-- DID YOU GET ALL THOSE CARS WITH THE PROPERTY TOO? >> THEY WERE LIKELY WILLING TO TAKE THE CARS. >> GREAT. THANK YOU FOR STICKING WITH IT. I THINK THIS IS GOING TO BE A MAJOR FACE-LIFT FOR THE CORRIDOR. AND WE ARE VERY EXCITED. I AM VERY EXCITED ABOUT IT. >> THANK YOU. AND THAT FEELING IS MUTUAL. I REALLY AM APPRECIATIVE OF THAT. THANK YOU. >> I DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. I DON'T HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS OR CARDS. AT THIS TIME. COUNCIL, IF THERE ARE NO FURTHER COMMENTS, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. >> I MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. >> SECOND. >> EVERYONE BUT PATRICK PLEASE VOTE. SIX VOTES, NO NO'S. THANK YOU SO MUCH. NOW WE ARE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND VOTE. WE NEED TO MOVE TO APPROVE THE MOTION. >> MOVED TO APPROVE THE ORDINANCE SET OUT IN THE CAPTION. >> I SECOND. >> WE ARE WAITING FOR THAT. MOTION PASSES 6-0. ALL RIGHT. [3. 26-4638 Public Hearing: In Accordance with Chapter 214 of the Local Government Code and Article VII, Chapter 4 of the Lewisville City Code, a Public Hearing is Required so that City Council Can Consider Whether the Structure Located at 2274 S Uecker Lane (A 1.31-Acre Tract (Tract 12) in the L. Burgois Survey Abstract 52A) Should be Declared a Substandard Structure and Whether the Structure Must Be Secured, Vacated, Repaired, Removed, or Demolished.] MOVING ON. ITEM C3. PUBLIC HEARING: IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 214 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE AND ARTICLE VII, CHAPTER 4 OF THE LEWISVILLE CITY CODE, A PUBLIC HEARING IS REQUIRED SO THAT CITY COUNCIL CAN CONSIDER WHETHER THE STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 2274 S UECKER LANE (A 1.31-ACRE TRACT (TRACT 12) IN THE L. BURGOIS SURVEY ABSTRACT 52A) SHOULD BE DECLARED A SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURE AND WHETHER THE STRUCTURE MUST BE SECURED, VACATED, REPAIRED, REMOVED, OR DEMOLISHED. AT THIS TIME I BELIEVE WE WANT TO GO AHEAD AND TABLE THIS UNTIL THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING. OR CONTINUE IT. SORRY ABOUT THAT. AND THE CONTINUATION, WHAT IS THE NEXT DATE? AUGUST 3RD. ALL RIGHT. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CONTINUE THIS UNTIL AUGUST 3RD. >> I MOVED TO CONTINUE THIS TO AUGUST 3RD. >> SECOND. >> I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. YES? [01:30:06] GO AHEAD COME ON. WHAT WE ARE PLANNING ON DOING IS TABLING THIS SO WE CAN POTENTIALLY BRING IT BACK UP IN TWO AND A HALF WEEKS. CAN I GET YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENTS FOR THE RECORD. >> I AM A RESIDENT OF FRISCO. B YOUR COMMENT? >> I KNOW THE NEXT PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA IS ABOUT THE PROPERTIES TO BE DEMOLISHED. BUT AS OF TODAY YOU HAVE LISTED ALL THE PROPERTIES. SO YOU ARE AWARE OF THAT. THEY HAVE ALREADY DEMOLISHED ALL FOUR PROPERTY. >> WE APPRECIATE THAT. WE WILL GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION HERE TO TABLE AND-- TO CONTINUE, AND MAKE SURE EVERYTHING IS TAKEN CARE OF BY THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING. I APPRECIATE YOU GETTING IN THERE AND DOING THE WORK. THANK YOU. COUNCIL? WE NEED A MOTION TO CONTINUE. >> I MOVED TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO AUGUST 3RD. >> DO I HAVE A SECOND? >> SECOND. >> ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR? MOTION PASSES 6-0. [4. 26-4639 Public Hearing: In Accordance with Chapter 214 of the Local Government Code and Article VII, Chapter 4 of the Lewisville City Code, a Public Hearing is Required so that City Council Can Consider of Whether the Structure Located at 2304 S Uecker Lane (A 1.5-Acre Tract (Tract 14) in the L. Burgois Survey Abstract 52A) Should be Declared a Substandard Structure and Whether the Structure Must Be Secured, Vacated, Repaired, Removed, or Demolished.] ALL RIGHT. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM FOUR. PUBLIC HEARING: IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 214 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE AND ARTICLE VII, CHAPTER 4 OF THE LEWISVILLE CITY CODE, A PUBLIC HEARING IS REQUIRED SO THAT CITY COUNCIL CAN CONSIDER OF WHETHER THE STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 2304 S UECKER LANE (A 1.5-ACRE TRACT (TRACT 14) IN THE L. BURGOIS SURVEY ABSTRACT 52A) SHOULD BE DECLARED A SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURE AND WHETHER THE STRUCTURE MUST BE SECURED, VACATED, REPAIRED, REMOVED, OR DEMOLISHED. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> I MOVE TO CONTINUE UNTIL AUGUST 3RD. >> I HAVE THE MOTION, DO I HAVE A SECOND? ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE VOTE. MOTION PASSES 6-0. [5. 26-4640 Public Hearing: In Accordance with Chapter 214 of the Local Government Code and Article VII, Chapter 4 of the Lewisville City Code, a Public Hearing is Required so that City Council Can Consider Whether the Structure Located at 2316 S Uecker Lane (A 1.5-Acre Tract (Tract 15) in the L. Burgois Survey Abstract 52A) Should be Declared a Substandard Structure and Whether the Structure Must Be Secured, Vacated, Repaired, Removed, or Demolished.] THANK YOU, COUNCIL. ITEM C5 PUBLIC HEARING: IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 214 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE AND ARTICLE VII, CHAPTER 4 OF THE LEWISVILLE CITY CODE, A PUBLIC HEARING IS REQUIRED SO THAT CITY COUNCIL CAN CONSIDER WHETHER THE STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 2316 S UECKER LANE (A 1.5-ACRE TRACT (TRACT 15) IN THE L. BURGOIS SURVEY ABSTRACT 52A) SHOULD BE DECLARED A SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURE AND WHETHER THE STRUCTURE MUST BE SECURED, VACATED, REPAIRED, REMOVED, OR DEMOLISHED. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> I MOVED TO CONTINUE THIS AT THE NEXT MEETING. >> DO I HAVE A SECOND? I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. COUNCIL, PLEASE VOTE. JENNIFER IS MAKING THAT THING [6. 26-4642 Public Hearing: In Accordance with Chapter 214 of the Local Government Code and Article VII, Chapter 4 of the Lewisville City Code, a Public Hearing is Required so that City Council Can Consider Whether the Structure Located at 2328 S Uecker Lane (A 1.5-Acre Tract (Tract 16) in the L. Burgois Survey Abstract 52A) Should be Declared a Substandard Structure and Whether the Structure Must Be Secured, Vacated, Repaired, Removed, or Demolished.] DANCE. ALL RIGHT. ITEM C6 PUBLIC HEARING: IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 214 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE AND ARTICLE VII, CHAPTER 4 OF THE LEWISVILLE CITY CODE, A PUBLIC HEARING IS REQUIRED SO THAT CITY COUNCIL CAN CONSIDER WHETHER THE STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 2328 S UECKER LANE (A 1.5-ACRE TRACT (TRACT 16) IN THE L. BURGOIS SURVEY ABSTRACT 52A) SHOULD BE DECLARED A SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURE AND WHETHER THE STRUCTURE MUST BE SECURED, VACATED, REPAIRED, REMOVED, OR DEMOLISHED. COUNCIL, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL AUGUST 3RD. >> SECOND. >> I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR. [E. Consent Agenda] HERE COMES THE VOTE. THE MOTION PASSES 6-0. ALL RIGHT. NEXT UP, ITEM E, CONSENT AGENDA. ALL THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED TO BE SELF EX PLANETARY BY THE COUNCIL AND WILL BE ENACTED WITH ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THE ITEMS IN A SAFE CONSUL MEMBER OR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC SO REQUEST. FOR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC TO REQUEST REMOVAL OF AN ITEM, A SPEAKER CARD ERNIE CLEMENT MUST BE FILLED OUT AND SUBMIT A TO THE CITY SECRETARY. THAT INCLUDES THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. >> MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. >> SECOND. >> I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. COUNCIL, PLEASE VOTE. >> MOTION PASSES 6-0. [G. Reports] WE HAVE NO REGULAR HEARINGS. I HAVE NO REPORTS FROM STAFF. WE WILL GO AHEAD AND START WITH REPORTS FROM CITY COUNCIL. COUNCILOR KELLY? COUNCILOR GREEN? >> I WAS GOING TO MENTION HOW MUCH I APPRECIATE THOSE PEOPLE WHO CAME TONIGHT TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF ITEMS. I JUST WANTED TO SAY HOW MUCH I APPRECIATE THEM TAKING THE TIME TO SPEAK TO US. WHENEVER WE TAKE THESE CONVERSATIONS OFF OF THE INTERNET AND IN TO PERSON I FEEL LIKE WE ALWAYS COME UP WITH MUCH BETTER SOLUTIONS. AND WE HAVE A LOT MORE CIVILITY AND COMMUNITY AND IT'S VERY MUCH APPRECIATED. >> NO REPORT HERE. [01:35:05] >> NO REPORT. >> NO REPORT. >> NOTHING TO REPORT. >> CITY ATTORNEY? MISS MCGRATH, ANYTHING? I HAVE NOTHING IN ADDITION. WITH THAT, IF THERE IS NOTHING FURTHER * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.