[1. 26-4782 Public Hearing: Consideration of an Ordinance of the Lewisville City Council, Amending the Zoning Ordinance by Rezoning Approximately 0.3682 Acres of Land, Legally Described as the L. M. Kealy Addition, Block C, Lots 13 and 14; Located at 207 West Purnell Street; From Single-Family Residential, 7,500 Square Foot Lot (R-7.5) District Zoning to Old Town Mixed-Use Two (OTMU-2) District Zoning; Correcting the Official Zoning Map; Preserving all Other Portions of the Zoning Ordinance; Determining That the Zoning Amendment Herein Made Promotes the Health, Safety, and General Welfare of the City; Providing for a Savings Clause, Repealer, Severability, a Penalty, and an Effective Date; as Requested by Marisa Brewer, the Applicant, on Behalf of John Christopher Viator, the Property Owner (Case No. 26-08-6-Z).]

ITEM D1, PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE OF LEWISVILLE CITY COUNCIL BY REZONING APPROXIMATELY 3.682 ACRES OF LAND BLOCK C LOTS 13 AND 14 LOCATED WEST PURNELLEL STREET FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 7500FOOT LOT TO MIXED USE 2 DISTRICT ZONING CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ORDINANCE DETERMINING FROM A HEALTH AND SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITY PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PENALTY AND EFFECTIVE DATE AS REQUESTED BY MARISSA BREWER THE PROPERTY OWNER CASE NUMBER 26-08-6-Z. THE BACKGROUND TEA LOUNGE AND TEA CONCEPT HAS BEEN OPERATING AS A HOME OCCUPATION.

THIS WOULD ALLOW FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF THIS TEA LOUNGE AS A STAND ALONE USE. THE PLANNING ZONING ZONE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL 5-0 ON SEPTEMBER 5, 2026, AND RECOMMENDED TO SET FORTH IN THE CAPTION ABOVE.

MR. RICHARD LUTKE IS AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS AND THE PUBLIC

HEARING ON THIS IS NOW OPEN. >> RICHARD, I WAS JUST CURIOUS.

DO WE HAVE ANY DORKS WE GET ANY LETTERS OR CALLS OR EMAILS ABOUT

THIS APPLICATION? >> WE HAVE NOT.

>> OKAY. THANK YOU.

>> I DO HAVE THREE FOR ANY NEW MEMBERS WHO WISH TO SPEAK.

THEY DON'T ALL WISH TO SPEAK. TWO ARE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.

[00:20:01]

FIRST UP I HAVE LINETTE ALEXANDER WHO DOES WANT TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. IF YOU WOULD STATE YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE FOR THE RECORD PLEASE.

>> OF COURSE. ANY MY NAME IS DONETTE ALEXANDER. I LIVE AT 338 THATCHER FOR THE LAST 30 YEARS. SO I AM A LONG-TIME RESIDENT.

MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THEY WANT TO REZONE THIS SO THEY CAN HAVE A TEA HOUSE. AND I LOVE TEA SO THAT'S NOT A PROBLEM. MY CONCERN IS THE NEIGHBOURHOOD IS VERY SMALL. THERE IS A LOT OF TRAFFIC AND NOT A LOT OF ROOM FOR CARS. AND ALTHOUGH A TEA SHOP IS DIFFERENTIATE GREAT, I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH CONTROL THE CITY HAS OVER WHAT MIGHT GO IN WHEN THE HOUSELINGS AND SOMEONE ELSE COMES IN AND WANTS TO PUT IN A DIFFERENT BUSINESS.

IT MIGHT BE SOMETHING GREAT LIKE AN ART STUDIO.

BUT IT MIGHT BE A VAPE SHOP. AND SINCE IT'S RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE CHURCH AND A BIG PARK BEHIND A SCHOOL WHICH IS AN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER WHICH MIGHT AGAIN BE AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE REZONING.

THERE'S NOT A LOT OF PARKING, SO I DON'T KNOW WHERE ALL THE CARS WOULD GO. AND SINCE EVERY DAY ON HATCHER I SEE KIDS WALKING HOME FROM SCHOOL AND THERE'S NO SIDEWALK SO THEY ARE WALKING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE STREET BECAUSE THERE'S NOWHERE ELSE TO WALK, AND MOTHERS PUSHING STROLLERS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE STREET BECAUSE THERE IS NOWHERE ELSE TO WALK.

ANY ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC IN OUR AREA IS A CAUSE OF CONCERN FOR ME. SO I JUST WANTED TO BRING THAT TO YOUR ATTENTION BEFORE YOU MAKE A DECISION ABOUT THE REZONING IN THIS AREA. LIKE I SAID, I HAVE NO OBJECTION TO A TEA SHOP. IT'S JUST I DON'T KNOW -- IT'S REALLY A LACK OF INFORMATION ON MY PART.

I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH CONTROL YOU HAVE OVER WHOEVER OWNS IT NEXT. AND I DO WANT TO BRING MY CONCERNS ABOUT THE TRAFFIC AND THE SAFETY OF PEOPLE WALKING IN MY NEIGHBOURHOOD THAT MIGHT BE AFFECTED BY PEOPLE TRYING TO FIND THIS LOCATION. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. I DO HAVE MARISSA BREWER AND MADELEINE CRUZE BOTH AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.

THEY ARE IN SUPPORT OF THIS ITEM.

AND I THINK MS. CRUZE IS THE OWNER OF THE TEA SHOP; IS THAT

CORRECT? >> SO MS. ALEXANDER, YOU HIT ON THE EXACT CONCERNS I WAS THINKING ABOUT BECAUSE I HAD THE SAME QUESTIONS YOU HAD WHICH IS THE TEA SHOP IS A GREAT IDEA.

IT'S BEEN THERE FOR A WHILE. SEEMS GOOD FOR THE NEIGHBOURHOOD. BUT WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THAT PROPERTY SELLS AND TURNS OVER? WHAT KIND OF CONTROL DO WE HAVE OVER THAT ZONING TO KEEP IT FROM BECOMING A VAPE SHOP, MULTIFAMILY, THINGS LIKE THAT. COULD YOU ELABORATE ON?

>> RIGHT. THANK YOU.

WHEN STAFF IS REVIEWING A ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION LIKE THIS, IT'S STANDARD PROTOCOL FOR STAFF TO LOOK AT ALL OF THE USE THAT IS ARE PERMITTED IN THE PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT.

I BELIEVE IN YOUR EMAIL YOU MENTIONED MULTIFAMILY.

MULTIFAMILY IS ALLOWED IN THE DISTRICT.

HOWEVER, IT IS ONLY ALLOWED ON PROPERTIES WITH AT LEAST ONE ACRE OF LAND. AND THIS SITE IS ONLY ONE-THIRD ACRE. SO THEREFORE MULTIFAMILY WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED. HOWEVER, TOWNHOMES WOULD BE ALLOWED. BUT AGAIN THE SIZE OF THE SITE REALLY DOES KIND OF DICTATE. AND WE DO HAVE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL OF OUR USE AS WE DO THROUGHOUT THE CITY.

SO I BELIEVE REALLY THE SMALL SCALE OF THE SITE EVEN OF COMMERCIAL IS DEVELOPED THERE WITH THE EXISTING BUILDINGS AND THE SITE IS COMPLETELY REDEVELOPED WITH NEW BUILDINGS IT WOULD BE OF SUCH A SCALE TO MEET THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS THAT IT WOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE OTHER THREE CORNERS AT THAT

LOCATION. >> THE OTHER THREE CORNERS ARE CURRENTLY BUSINESSES? (INAUDIBLE).

>> YES. THE ZONING WOULD ALLOW ANY OTHER TYPE OF RETAIL RESTAURANT OR OFFICE TYPE USES.

AGAIN, THEY WOULD DEPENDINGEN ON THE TYPE OF USE IT WOULD HAVE TO MEET THE PARKING PRESCRIBED BY THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AND WOULD HAVE TO MEET, YOU KNOW, ALL LANDSCAPING, ALL OF OUR DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS STATED IN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE.

(INAUDIBLE). >> MA'AM.

I UNDERSTAND YOUR CONCERNS ABSOLUTELY.

BUT THANK YOU. >> TILLICALLY WHEN A NEW BUSINESS GOES IN, IT TYPICALLY TRIGGERS A NEW ENGINEERING SITE PLAN. AND THEREFORE ALL REGULATIONS OF THE CITY ARE LOOKED AT AND SIDEWALKS ARE REQUIRED USUALLY AT PROMINENT INTERSECTIONS LIKE THIS, THE CITY HAS ALREADY INSTALLED CROSSWALKS THERE. SO AGAIN LIKE ANY OTHER LOCATION

[00:25:02]

WITHIN OLD TOWN THEY WILL HAVE TO MEET ALL MINIMUM STANDARDS

REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE USE IS. >> MY UNDERSTANDING FOR PARKING IS THAT THERE'S BEEN A DEAL STRUCK WITH THE CHURCH ACROSS THE STREET FOR ADDITIONAL PARKING TO WE'RE NOT LOOKING AT ADDITIONAL PARK FOR THE TEA ROOM.

>> CORRECT. THEY HAVE WORKED OUT AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CHURCH ACROSS THE STREET SINCE THIS IS VERY SMALL SCALE, I THINK A REGULAR RESTAURANT, A LARGER RESTAURANT WOULD REQUIRE ON SITE PARKING, SO THEREFORE THAT WOULD BE QUITE DIFFICULT AT THIS SITE TO ACCOMMODATE A LARGER SCALE

RESTAURANT. >> AND THIS BUSINESS IS LOOKING TO EXPAND AND GET BIGGER. THIS IS BASICALLY TRYING TO BRING THEM IN COMPLIANCE TO DO THE BUSINESS AS THEY HAVE BEEN DOING FOR THE PAST COUPLE YEARS, IS THAT ACCURATE?

>> RIGHT FROM. WHAT WE UNDERSTAND, THE OWNERS JUST WANT TO LIVE IN AND MAINTAIN THE RESIDENCE IN THE HOUSE BUT JUST USE THE ACCESSORY BUILDING FOR THE SMALL TEA ROOM WHICH HAS A LIMITED PARKING REQUIREMENT.

>> WE HAVE SOME REPRESENTATIVES HERE FROM THAT BUSINESS; IS THAT

RIGHT, MAYOR? >> WE DO.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THAT TO MADAM CRUISE.

CAN YOU TELL US ABOUT THE BUSINESS AND WHAT YOUR PLANS

ARE? >> MY NAME IS MARCY BREWER.

AIM PLANNER AT 4400 STATE HIGHWAY 421 LEWISVILLE, TEXAS.

I AM THE CONSULTANT FOR PROPERTY OWNER.

SHE IS HERE FOR QUESTIONS. BUT I AM GOING TO GO AHEAD AND TRY TO ELABORATE ON YOUR QUESTIONS FIRST BEFORE I BRING HER UP. THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY IS BY APPOINTMENT ONLY. IT'S REALLY WHERE THEY COME IN AND SCHEDULE EVENTS TO HAVE THE AFTERNOON TEA AND SO PEOPLE WILL COME IN, LEARN HOW TO MAKE THE TEA, MAKE SANDWICHES, AND HAVE A DAY OF ETIQUETTE. THAT IS KIND OF THE OPERATION OF HOW EVERYTHING WORKS. AND AS RICHARD MENTIONED, THERE IS A SECURED PARKING AGREEMENT WITH THE CHURCH ACROSS THE

STREET. >> THIS IS LIKE A HIGH TEA SO THERE'S LITTLE FINGER SANDWICHES AND THINGS LIKE THAT?

>> CORRECT. >> OKAY, ALL RIGHT.

>> WHAT'S THE AGREEMENT WITH THE CHURCH?

WHAT ARE THE SPECIFICS ON THAT? >> THERE IS 30 PARKING SPACES AT THE CHURCH THAT THEY CAN USE. AND THEN THE BUILDING CODE WILL REQUIRE THE ADA SPOTS TO BE ON SITE, SO THAT WILL BE WHERE BUILDING CODE WILL MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE IN COMBINES WITH THAT PARKING NUMBER AND THEN HAVING THOSE ADA SPOTS IN FRONT OF THE, ON THE CURRENT DRIVEWAY OF THE LOCATION OF WHERE THE BUILDING

IS AT. >> RICHARD, IF THAT PARKING AGREEMENT WERE TO BE TERMINATED BY THE CHURCH OR TEA ROOM, WOULD

THAT IMPACT THEIR CO? >> YES, IT WOULD.

THEY WOULD HAVE TO AMEND THEIR CO AND PROVIDE PROOF THAT THEY ARE MEETING THE PARKING REQUIREMENT.

>> AND IF WE SCRAPE THAT LOCATION, LET'S JUST GO TO GROUND ZERO AND YOU WANTED TO PUT A BUSINESS IN THERE, WHAT'S THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF PARKING THAT WOULD BE NEEDED ON THAT SITE? SO IT GETS TO THE QUESTION OF ABOUT TRAFFIC, SO LET'S JUST WHAT'S THE WORST-CASE SCENARIO? NOW WE HAVE ZONED THIS OTMU2. WHAT'S THE WORST-CASE SCENARIO FOR PARKING REQUIRED ON THAT CORNER? WITHOUT AN AGREEMENT ACROSS THE STREET?

>> GENERALLY FOR OFFICE OR RETAIL, IT'S ABOUT 300 OR ONE SPACE PER 300 SQUARE FEET, SO DEPENDS ON THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING. BUT IT WOULD BE THAT BALANCING POINT ON WHAT THE SITE COULD PROVIDE IN PARKING AT ONE PER 300 SQUARE FEET. SO A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING WOULD REQUIRE TEN PARKING SPACES.

>> WELL, 10 PARKING SPACES ON A .37 ACRES.

THAT NUMBER YOU HAVE THE PARKING SPACES THEMSELVES AND THEN YOU HAVE SOME SORT OF FIRE LINER ACCESS LANE.

THAT IS GOING TO BE A VERY, VERY TIGHT SQUEEZE.

IF THE WHOLE BUILDING WAS SCRAPED, I ASSUME FIRST OF ALL THAT THE PARKING AGREEMENT IS JUST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS BUSINESS ITSELF. SO IF THIS BUSINESS STOPS OPERATING, THAT PARKING AGREEMENT GOES AWAY.

>> THAT IS CORRECT. >> SO I AM JUST THINKING ABOUT FROM, YOU KNOW, FROM MY PUTTING ON MY LAND PLANNING HAT, YOU KNOW, HOW MUCH, HOW BIG OF AN IF YOU WERE TO PUT A RESTAURANT THERE WHICH HAS I MEAN A RESTAURANT HAS THE HIGHEST PARKING REQUIREMENT OUT OF ANY OF THE COMMERCIAL USES.

>> CORRECT. >> SO I JUST I'M NOT EVEN SURE THAT THIS SITE IS LARGE ENOUGH TO FIT A RESTAURANT WITH THE

REQUIRED PARKING ON IT. >> WOULD PROBABLY BE A VERY

SMALL RESTAURANT. >> I MEAN VERY, VERY SMALL.

LIKE HOLE IN THE WALL TYPE. AND THEN FROM AS FAR AS, LIKE, WHAT COULD GO THERE, I KNOW THE NARRATIVE AND OUR BACKUP LISTED SEVERAL THINGS MOST OF WHICH LIKE A GROCERY STORE, THERE'S NO

[00:30:05]

WAY. THERE'S NO, PAING.

GROCERY STORES NEED TO HAVE PARKING.

SO THERE'S NO WAY. I DON'T SEE HOW A THEATRE WOULD BE ACCOMMODATED OR A HOTEL. IT'S JUST NOT BIG ENOUGH.

INDOOR COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT IS NOT BIG ENOUGH.

POSSIBLYA DAY CARE CENTER A VERY SMALL ONE BUT ANYTHING BEYOND THAT IF IT WAS GOING TO BE A FOOD TRUCK PARK, A BAR,INGS YOU MENTIONED THE GASOLINE SERVICE. THAT WOULD BE A SUP AND WOULD BE SOMETHING WE WOULD HAVE ABILITY TO SAY NO TO.

SO GIVEN THE SIZE OF THE SITE AND WHAT'S PHYSICALLY GOING TO BE ABLE TO FIT ON IT, I'M NOT TOO CONCERNED ABOUT ANY DISRUPTED BUSINESSES COMING IN AFTER THE TEA ROOM.

I AM EXCITED TO LEARN THE TEA ROOM IS CONTINUING TO STAY IN BUSINESS AND PROVIDING PARKING THAT ACCOMMODATES THEIR NEEDS THAT'S NOT JUST SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THE NEIGHBOURHOOD.

SO I THINK THAT'S A WIN AND THERE'S NOT ZERO RISK YEARS DOWN THE ROAD, BUT I THINK GIVEN THE SIZE OF THE SITE I THINK IT'S

PRETTY MINIMAL. >> LET ME GO BACK AND ASK THE QUESTION AS WELL. THIS IS NOT AN EFFORT TO MAKE THIS BIGGER OR DOUBLE IN SIZE, BRING IN MORE CUSTOMERS.

THIS IS JUST AN EFFORT TO BE COMPLIANT.

>> THAT'S RIGHT. AND THE OWNER LIVES ON THE RESIDENCE, SO OBVIOUSLY MAKE SURE.

THE THEY WANTED TO BE A GREAT PLACE BECAUSE THEY LIVE THERE AS

WELL. >> AND ANY GIVEN DAY, WHAT ARE THE HOURS? I HAVE TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT TO THIS 24 HOURS A DAY OR ONLY CERTAIN DAYS, CERTAIN HOURS?

>> YES. I WOULD HAVE TO POINT THAT

QUESTION TO MADELEINE. >> HELLO.

I AM THE OWNER OF THE BACKROOM TEA LOUNGE AND IT'S THE SAME WAY IT WORKS IN LONDON. BY APPOINTMENT ONLY.

WE MAKE EVERYTHING FRESH. USUALLY THE IDEAL TIME IS SATURDAY AT 11:30 LIFE-THREATENING A.

IT TAKES ABOUT AN HOUR AND A HALF.

WE TRY TO DO JUST ONE SESSION BECAUSE WE DO A LOT OF WORK AND EFFORT AND WANT TO OFFER THE BEST CUSTOMER SERVICE WE CAN GIVE. SO USUALLY SATURDAY AT 11:30 A.M. IS IDEAL. WE BOTH HAVE FULL-TIME JOBS.

I WORK FOR NBC. I HAVE BEEN IN THE MEDIA FOR 30 YEARS, AND THAT IS MY MAIN CONCERN IS WHAT I DO FOR A LIVING. IT'S SOMETHING I LOVE TO DO AND LOVE TO DO IT. AND WE INVESTED HALF A MILLION DOLLARS IN THIS PROPERTY BECAUSE WE WANT TO OFFER THIS TO THE COMMUNITY. WE DON'T WANT TO GET RICH OUT OF IT IT'S NOT AN INCOME WE WANT TO SUPPORT OURSELVES.

USUALLY SATURDAYS 11:30 A.M. OCCASIONALLY MAYBE A SUNDAY.

>> OKAY. AWESOME.

ALL RIGHT. ONE LAST QUESTION REALLY MORE FOR RICHARD. IS THERE A WAY TO TIE THIS TO THE BUSINESS INSTEAD OF THE LAND SO IF THIS DECIDE TO CLOSE DOWN IT REVERTS BACK TO WHAT IT IS TODAY, RESIDENTIAL?

>> NO. WE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO DO THAT BECAUSE THIS IS THIS IS A STRAIT ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE.

THAT WOULD ONLY BE ALLOWED IF THIS WAS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.

>> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? IF THERE ARE NONE, COUNCIL WILL ENTRAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE

PUBLIC HEARING. >> MOVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC

HEARING. >> SECOND.

>> MOTION TO SECOND. COUNCIL, WILL YOU PLEASE VOTE.

MOTION PASSES 5-0. NEVER MIND.

I THOUGHT WE WERE MISSING ONE BUT WE'RE NOT.

ENTRAIN A MOTION ON THE NEXT PUBLIC HEARING.

>> MOTION APPROVE THE ORDINANCES IN THE CAPTION.

>> SECOND. >> I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE AS SET FORTH. COUNCIL, WILL YOU PLEASE VOTE.

MOTION PASSES 5-0. THANK YOU.

ITEM E VISITERS FORUMS. MUST ADDRESS TO THE MAYOR RATHER

[00:35:02]

THAN STAFF. SPEAKERS WILL BE ALLOWED THREE MINUTES FOR TESTIMONY. SPEAKERS MUST REFRAIN FROM LAND IS ROUSE REMARKS MAY BE REMOVED FROM THE MEETING.

WHISTLERS AND CLAPPING WILL NOT BE EMTED.

CITY COUNCIL IS RESTRICTED FROM TAKING ACTION ON ITEMS IN THE

[F. Consent Agenda]

AGENDA. CITY SECRETARY I DO NOT HAVE ANY COMMENTS SO WE WILL GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.

I WILL ENTRAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS

PRESENTED. >> MOVE TO APPROVE.

>> SECOND. >> I HAVE A MOTION TO SECOND.

COUNCIL, WOULD YOU PLEASE VOTE? MOTION PASSES.

[4. 26-4781 Consideration of two Alternative Standards to the IH-35E Corridor Overlay District, Main Street Core Sub-District Regulations Associated With Driveway Spacing and the Maximum Build-to Zone Along South Edmonds Lane; on 2.981 Acres out of the J. Craft Survey, Abstract Number 295; Located at 217 South Stemmons Freeway (IH-35E); Zoned General Business (GB) District; as Requested by Bryan Weisgerber, of Cross Engineering Consultants, the Applicant, on Behalf of Colonial Savings and Loan, the Property Owner (Case No. 26-08-8-AltStd).]

TWO ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS TO THE IH34E CORE DISTRICT REGULATION ASSOCIATED WITH DRIVEWAY SPACING AND THE MAXIMUM BILL 2 ZONE ALONG SOUTH EDMONDS LANE. ON 2.29 ACRES ABSTRACT 295 LOCATED ON THE FREEWAY ZONED GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AS REQUESTED BY BRIAN WISEGERBER THE APPLICANT ON BEHALF OF COLONIAL SAVINGS AND LOAN 36-A-8.

COLONIAL SAVINGS AND LOAN IS PROPOSING TO REDEVELOP THE NORTHERN PORTION OF ITS LOT INTO A BANK BRANCH AND CHALLENGE RELATED TO DRIVEWAYS IN AN EXISTING 60-FOOT ELECTRIC EASEMENT. FROM 300 FEET TO 316 FEET TO THE DRIVEWAY ON THE ADJACENT LOT TO THE NORTH.

267 FEET BETWEEN THE TWO SITE DRIVEWAYS AND 16 FEET TO THE DRIVEWAY ON THE ADJACENT LOT TO THE SOUTH AND B TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM BILL TO ZONE FROM 10 FEET TO 20884 FEET.

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL 5-0 ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2026, AND HAS RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE TWO ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CAPTION ABOVE. RICHARD LUTKE OUR PLANNING DIRECT SENIOR AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS, AND I DON'T BELIEVE WE HAVE ANYBODY ELSE ALTHOUGH I DO THINK I DID SEE SOMEBODY FROM CROSS ENGINEERING HERE, SO IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS.

IF THERE'S NO QUESTIONS, I WILL ENTRAIN A MOTION.

>> I MOVE THE ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS AS SET FORTH IN THE

CAPTION. >> SECOND.

>> I HAVE A MOTION TO SECOND. WOULD YOU PLEASE VOTE.

[5. 26-4766 Consideration of Appointing a Board Member and an Alternate Board Member to the Denton County Transportation Authority (DCTA) Board of Directors.]

MOTION PASSES 5-0. ITEM 5, CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTING BOARD MEMBER AND AN ALTERNATIVE BOARD MEMBER TO THE DENTON COUNTY AUTHORITY DCTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

THEY TRYER BOARD MEMBERS AND ALL ALTERNATES RESIDE IN THE TERRITORY OF THE AUTHORITY. THEY SERVE FOR TWO YEAR TERMS. MAYOR GILMOUR AND COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN'S TERMS ARE EXPIRING ON OCTOBER 12, 2026. COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN HAS EXPRESSED INTEREST AS SERVING ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

DEPUTY MAYOR TIPTON EXPRESSED AN INTEREST IN SERVING AS THE CITY'S ALTERNATE BOARD MEMBER. IT IS RECOMMENDED THEY APPOINT A BOARD MEMBER AS SET FORTH IN THE CAPTION ABOVE.

AND I THINK WE HAVE SOME LANGUAGE FOR THAT IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS. I WILL ENTRAIN A MOTION.

>> MOTION TO APPOINT AS BOARD MEMBER AND DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TAM TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AS SET FORTH IN THE CAPTION.

>> SECT. >> COUNCIL, WOULD YOU PLEASE VOTE. MOTION PASSES 5-0.

THANK YOU, COUNCIL. ITEM 6 CASTING THE CITY'S VOTE

[6. 26-4779 Consideration of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lewisville, Texas, Casting the City’s Vote for the Region 8 Director on the Texas Municipal League Board of Directors; and Providing an Effective Date.]

FOR THE REGION 8 DIRECTOR AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

CITY OF LEWISVILLE IS BEING ASKED TO CAST ITS VOTE ON THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

TML IS A 15 SUBSATE REGION. THE REGIONS PARTICIPATE ON A REGIONAL LEVEL AMONG CITIES IN THE REGION AND ASSIST THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND REPRESENTS THE DIVERSE INTERESTS OF THE STATE.

VOTES ARE DUE BY NOVEMBER 1, 2026.

DISCUSSION AT THIS POINT. >> MAYOR, I PERSONALLY WOULD LIKE PUT FORTH MIKE BROWNY WHO I SUPPORT.

THERE WAS SOME OTHER OPTIONS THAT WE HAD THAT I DO A LOT OF INVESTIGATION INTO THIS. I THINK MIKE WOULD BE A GREAT

CHOICE. >> ARE YOU MAKING A MOTION?

>> COULD MAKE THE MOTION. >> ANY OTHER COMMENT ON THAT

ONE? >> I WILL MAKE THE MOTION THEN.

NOTION APPROVE THE RESOLUTIONS AS CAST FOR MIKE BROWNING AS TML DIRECTOR ON THE TML DIRECTORS AS SET FORTH IN THE CAPTION.

[00:40:01]

>> I HAVE A MOTION TO SECOND. >> THANK YOU.